rylands v fletcher Flashcards

(17 cards)

1
Q

definitions of rylands v fletcher

A
  • strict liability tort
  • person who brings something onto their land thats likely to cause problems if it escape can be liable for any damages it causes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

who can claim under rylands v fletcher

A

claimant = must have interest in land

transco plc v stockport mbc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

who can be liable under rylands v fletcher

A

d must be occupier/controler of the land

read v Lyons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what must be brought onto ht eland

A

“thing” must be brought and accumulated
- if occurs naturally , no liability

giles v walker (weeds)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

must the thing be dangerous

A

no
nut must cause problems if it escapes

rylands v fletcher

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

must the thing escape

A

yes , must escape from ds land or control

read v Lyons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

examples of things that cause mischief if escape

A

gas/electricity
flagpole

etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what kind of damage must be caused

A

property damage needed
- fire = tricky , unless deliberately or negligently set, may not count

stannard v gore

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

is foreseeability required

A

yes
harm must be foreseeable, not escape itself

read v lyon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is a non natural use of land

A

extraordinary/ unusual use of land
potentially dangerous activity ( Cambridge water)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

can u claim for pi or finical loss under r v f

A

no

Cambridge water

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

whats defence of volenti non fit injuria

A

consent to the risk = no liability
Peters v prince of Wales theatre

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

defence of common benefit

A

no liability of both parties benefit

dunne v north west gas board

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

act of god defence

A

unforeseeable natural events occurring beyond human control

Nicholis v marsland

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

act of a stranger defence

A

damaged caused y someone the d has no control over
Perry v Kendricks transport

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

how does contributory negligence apply

A

if claimants own fiat contributed to damage , compensations reduced

Eastern & South African Telegraph Co v Cape Town Tramways

16
Q

remedies available

A

compensation damages for property damage
personal injury