Schachter and Singer Flashcards

1
Q

What is the Aim of this study?

A

To test the Two-Factor theory of Emotion. They wanted to research if, given a state of physiological arousal for which a person does not have a proper explanation, cognitive factors can lead the person to describe their feelings with any number of emotional labels.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the background to this study?

A

Psychologists since the late 1800’s have been intrigued by how individuals use internal or external cues in identifying their own emotional state; A few early research suggested that cognitive factors could possibly influence our emotional state.; cognition can be defined as the mental processes of acquiring and processing knowledge and understanding through experiences, senses and thought; emotion can be defined as the body’s adaptive response to a particular situation.

It was suggested that an emotional state can be considered a function of a state of physiological arousal and of a cognition appropriate to this state of arousal.
key words to use here: Adrenalin, flight or fight response and nervous system.

They suggest that emotional experience comes from a combo of a physical state of arousal and a cognition that makes the best sense of the situation that person is in.
The Two-Factor Theory argues that we experience emotions as an interaction between physiological and psychological variables. In order to achieve that, they created a situation where some participants were physiologically aroused through an epinephrine injection and are put in either a happy or angry situations to investigate if those participants would look to the situation for context cues to explain their arousal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What experiment was this? and why?

A

This was a laboratory experiment as the environment where the participants were tested was not comparable to an everyday situation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

comment on standardisation

A

it was a highly standardized procedure and all participants were exposed to the same environment with a scripted response from the stooge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the two independent variables? and what were the seven conditions that resulted from this?

A
  1. the first concerned the knowledge about the injections: informed, misinformed or ignorant
  2. The emotional situation the participant was placed into after the injection: euphoria or anger. There was also a CONTROL group who were not injected with epinephrine but a SALINE SOLUTION.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What experimental design is this study?

A

This is an example of independent groups design as participants took part in one of the seven groups.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What were the two key measures of the DV?

A
  1. Observational data that was recorded by two observers through a one way mirror during the emotional arousal element of the experiment. They had to measure to what extent the participant acted in a euphoric or angry way. The categories into which the behavior was coded in the angry condition was: agreed with a comment, disagreed with a comment, neutral to a comment, initiates agreement or disagreement, watches or ignores the stooge. In the Euphoric condition: joins in the activity, initiates a new activity, watches stooge or ignores stooge. To test the reliability of these measures, the observers coded their observations independently. The observers agreed on the coding of 88% of the behaviors they saw.
  2. The second was a self-report that the participants completed following the emotional arousal element of the research
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the sample of this study?

A
  1. 185 participants
  2. All male college students taking classes in introductory psychology at University of Minnesota.
  3. Many of them received course credit for taking part in the study
  4. The university health records of all the participants were checked prior to the experiment to ensure that no harmful effects would result from the injections.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Procedure

A
  1. When they arrived, they were told that the aim of the experiment was to test the effects of vitamin supplements on vision.
  2. A doctor then entered the room, repeated the same instructions, took their pulse and then injected the participant with ‘Suproxin’.
  3. They were actually injected with either adrenalin or a placebo which was the saline solution. The dosage they were injected with should have caused them to experience the side effects within three to five minutes and these could last up to an hour.
  4. those who were injected with adrenalin were then put into any one of three experimental conditions: informed, misinformed or ignorant. The fourth condition was for those who received the placebo injection.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What were the participants in the informed condition told?

A

Those in the informed condition were told they would expect some side effects of the injection such as that their hand will start to shake, their heart will start to pound and their face may get warm or flushed. These were the actual side effects on the adrenalin so the participants would have an explanation for any feelings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What were the participants in the misinformed condition told?

A

They were told that they could expect some side effects of the injection and these were that their feet will feel numb, some itching sensations over some parts of their body and a slight headache. These were not the actual side effects of the adrenaline injections so participants would not have any explanation for the actual side effects they would experience. This condition was introduced as a control condition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What were the participants in the ignorant condition told?

A

They were told that they would experience NO SIDE EFFECTS from the injections which means therefore these participants would not have an explanation fro the actual side effects that they would experience as a result of the injection of adrenalin.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What happened after the doctor injected the participants with the injections?

A

The doctor left the room and the experimenter returned with a stooge which was introduced as another participant and the experimenter said that both had the Suproxin injection which would take 10 min to be absorbed in the bloodstream after which they would both be given the same vision tests

This was the point that either participants were exposed to one of two emotional states: euphoria or anger.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What happened in the Euphoria condition?

A

The experimenter left, adding that if they needed rough paper rubber bands or pencils, they should help themselves. The waiting room was arranged to look in a state of disarray.
When the experimenter left, the stooge introduced himself again and made ice-breaker comments.
He then began his routine of playing with items such as paper, rubber bands, hula hoops, pencils etc.
the stooge then suggested that the participant joined.The routine was standardized as far as possible. However, the stooge was never aware of which condition any particular participant was in.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What happened in the anger condition?

A

The experimenter introduced the stooge and explained that it was necessary to wait 20 min in order to allow the Suproxin to enter the bloodstream and that meanwhile, the participants had to complete a questionnaire.
The stooge was instructed to create a feeling of anger in the room and achieved that by making comments that he made along the 20 minutes.The comments increased in intensity and were linked with the questions in the questionnaire. The questions also started getting more personal and the stooge became increasingly irate in his behavior.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What happened after the session with the stooge was complete?

A

The experimenter returned to the room and took their pulses and then told them there was one final questionnaire that considered their physical responses to the Suproxin. This was used as the second measures for the DV, self report. After they completed it, the experimenter announced it was over and explained the deception and its necessity in detail, answered any questions and swore the participants to secrecy to protect future runs of the experiment.

17
Q

Did the participants give consent?

A

Yes - the participants gave consent to take part in the study

18
Q

What are the 3 hypotheses?

A
  1. if a person experiences a state of arousal that they don’t have an immediate explanation for, they will give it a label and describe their feelings with the terms of the cognition available at the time.
  2. If a person experiences a state of arousal that they do have an explanation for then they will be unlikely to give a label to their feeling in terms of alternative cognition available.
  3. If a person is put in a situation, to which in the past could have made them feel emotions, they will react emotionally OR experience emotions only if they are in a state of physiological arousal.
19
Q

What were the results?

A

184 participants agreed to the injection.
11 were suspicious about some crucial features of the experiment that their data was discarded.
5 had no physiological reaction to the injection of epinephrine and were excluded from the data analysis.
169 participants’ data left to be analysed.

In the euphoria condition, the misinformed group were feeling happier whilst the second happiest group was the ignorant group. This shows that participants were susceptible to the stooge because they had no adequate explanation to what they felt. The informed group obviously felts the least happy since they were aware of why they felt the way they did.

In the angry condition, the ignorant group felts the angriest and the second angriest was the placebo group. the least happy and angry was the informed group and again this shows that they were more susceptible to the stooge as they did not know how to explain their emotions, unlike the informed group.

Their behaviors that were observed through a one-way-mirror matched their self-reports.

20
Q

What is sympathetic arousal?

A

When we are exposed to a stressful situation, the sympathetic nervous system becomes aroused which causes pupils to dilate, increased heart rate and glucose is released by the liver for extra energy needed to prepare the body to respond to alarm or stress.

21
Q

Who showed more sympathetic arousal?

A

The participants who received the injections of adrenaline showed significantly more sympathetic arousal, which was measures by the pulse rate and self rating of symptoms such as numbness, itching, headache etc), compared to the placebo participants.

22
Q

Why was the misinformed condition run only in euphoria?

A

Since it was a control condition, inclusion in just of the categories was adequate to evaluate the possible impact of receiving info about side effects after the injection.

23
Q

Conclusion?

A

Schachter and Singer argue that their findings support their Two-Factor theory of Emotion which says that physiological arousal in different emotions is entirely the same and we label our arousal according to the cognition we have available. They also argues that their hypotheses were supported and concluded that if a person experiences a state of arousal for which they cannot explain. the will label this state and describe their feelings in terms of cognition available at the time.

24
Q

What does this study help us understand?

A

It helps us understand how people use different environmental cues to help them interpret their physiological state. It might be applicable to treating those who suffer from anxiety or panic attack as it will allow them to identify the environmental triggers which could cause them to be physiologically aroused and fearful.

25
Q

List three strengths

A
  1. Schachter and Singer was a lab experiment that had a huge amount of control through their standardized procedure such as their random allocation of participants of the nature of the experiment (informed, misinformed and ignorant) which allowed them to deceive the participants and standardize the procedure as much as possible.(link deception to ethical issues)
  2. The use of questionnaires was a method to operationalize the DV which allowed Schachter and Singer to further standardize the collection of data within the experiment .
  3. The questionnaire allows researchers to collect quantitative data efficiently from the participants(some may argue that a questionnaire would not give the participants the freedom to express their feelings as a discussion which could therefore lead to little ecological validity in this research) but they also use observations and physical measures to assess both the physical and psychological impact of arousal.
26
Q

What is a double-blind technique?

A

When the researcher and the participant are unaware of which condition the participant is in, in order to prevent demand characteristics and acts as a control to improve validity of any of the data.

27
Q

List three weaknesses

A
  1. The sample solely consisted of university students which introduced participant variables that could distort the outcomes, therefore, reducing the validity.
  2. The sample consisted of only male participants which further impacted the ability to generalize the results as males and females experience emotions differently and this was ignored in this research.
  3. Another problem with the procedure was that there was no assessment of the participants’ mood before they received the injection in order to gain a baseline from which to measure any changes created due to the stooge.