Search and Seizure Flashcards
(91 cards)
To determine whether a search or seizure is governed by the 4th amendment, we must ask 4 questions (4 elements):
- Executed by government agent?
- From an area or of an item protected by the 4th amendment?
- Physical intrusion by a government agent or violation of a reasonable expectation of privacy?
- Does the individual subject to the search or seizure have “standing”?
What 4 categories of government agents are most important for the bar (in order of importance)
- Police (on or off duty)
- Private citizens if and only if acting at the direction of police
- Private security deputized with the power to arrest (campus police at a state school)
- Public school officials such as principles or vice principals
The 4th amendment protects individuals from unreasonable search and seizure of these 4 items or areas
1 their persons (bodies)
- Houses (including domestic use area outside house (porch, yard) & hotel rooms)
- Papers (letters)
- A facts (vehicles, purses, backpacks)
The following 8 items are not protected under the 4th amendment (Patty achieved a glorious victory over her opponent)
- Paint on your car
- Accounting records held by the bank
- Air – anything that can be seen from public airspace
- Garbage left in public
- Voice – the sound thereof
- Odors
- Handwriting
- Open fields – anything that can be seen in or across
You don’t have a reasonable expectation of privacy in anything you provide _______ to third parties
Knowing exposure
There are 2 ways in which searches and seizures by government agents can implicate a an individual’s 4th amendment rights
- Physical intrusion on a constitutionally protected area to obtain information (a tracking device on a car was an intrusion)
- The search or seizure of a constitutionally protected area violated an individuals reasonable expectation of privacy
The violation of a reasonable expectation of privacy has 2 components 1, 1 subjective one objective
- Subjective: the defendant had an actual subjective expectation of privacy in the area searched or items seized, and
- That privacy expectation was “one that society recognizes as reasonable”
The police search is presumptively unreasonable if it uses a device that is not?
Available for public use, and the police use it to explore the details of a home that officers couldn’t have known without the technology (heat vision).
To have standing to challenge the search or seizure, an individual must be bringing claim with respect to (A) his own? Or (B) a 3rd parties? privacy rights.
You may only bring a claim with respect to your own PERSONAL privacy rights, not those of a 3rd party
If you’re an overnight guest in someone’s house, in what areas do you have a reasonable expectation of privacy?
In the areas you can reasonably be expected to access: living room dining, dining room, bathroom, bedroom
If you are merely using a someone else’s residence for business purposes, do you have a reasonable execution of privacy in the property if you are not staying overnight?
No, you do not (apartment of acquaintance to bag cocaine).
If a man hides drugs in his girlfriend’s purse, does he have a reasonable expectation of privacy with respect to the drugs when they are seized?
No, because he does not have a reasonable execution of privacy in the AREA from which it was seized. Only to girlfriend does.
Do passengers in the car have a reasonable expectation of privacy with respect to searches of the automobile?
No, only the owner or driver.
Under New York law, passengers can challenge the finding of a what in a car, if it is attributed to them?
Passengers can challenge the possession of weapons, if possession is attributed to them
There are 4 requirements for a warrant under which criminal evidence is gathered to satisfy the 4th amendment. Name them
- Issued by a NEUTRAL and DETACHED magistrate
- Supported by PROBABLE CAUSE and PARTICULARITY
- If not so supported, officers relied on the defective warrant in good faith (New York rejects good faith doctrine)
- Warrant PROPERLY EXECUTED by the police
When is a magistrate not “neutral and detached”?
When her conduct demonstrates a bias in favor of the prosecution, e.g., if your salary is tied to number of warrants issued
Probable cause requires ____ ________ that contraband or evidence of crime will be found in the area searched
Fair probability
Is hearsay admissible for purposes of probable cause?
Yes, absolutely
When may police use anonymous informants tips at common law for purposes of probable cause?
When there is enough information for the MAGISTRATE to make a “commonsense, practical” determination that probable cause exists based on a TOTALITY of the circumstances
Under New York law, probable cause is evaluated under a stricter standard. When applying for search warrant the government must establish 2 things
- The informants BASIS OF KNOWLEDGE, and
2. The informants RELIABILITY or VERACITY
To satisfy the particularity requirement to get a warrant, it must specify 2 things:
- The place to be searched
- The items to be seized
a general warrant cannot be given authorizing a fishing expedition
By common law, a warrant that is invalid due to the absence of probable cause or particularity can be saved by an officer’s “good faith.” In New York?
In New York, a cop’s Good faith does not save a defective warrant.
An officer is good-faith reliance on a defective search warrant does not save it, if one of the 4 categorical exceptions to good-faith applies:
- If the affidavit supporting the warrant is EGREGIOUSLY lacking in probable cause (a bare-bones affidavit)
- The warrant is FACIALLY DEFICIENT in PARTICULARITY
- The affidavit contains KNOWING or RECKLESS FALSEHOODS
- The magistrate is biased
There are 2 aspects to the inquiry of whether a search warrant was properly executed by the police. Name the 2
- Whether the officers complied with the terms and limite of the warrant
- Whether the officers complied with the “knock and announce” rule