self defence Flashcards

1
Q

S.76 Criminal Justice & Immigration Act 2008

A

1 - did the accused honestly believe he had to act in the way he did, was the force necessary to D - subjective
2 - was the degree of force used reasonable - objective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

subjective test

A
  • force necessary to D
  • threat specific and imminent
  • D doesn’t have to wait for the assailant to strike first
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Cousins

A

believed a contract was taken out on his life, so threatened to ‘blow his brains out’
TJ - S.3 failed as there was no immediate threat
COA - threat was imminent to D, threat was necessary and reasonable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Attorney Generals Reference No2 1983

A

shop damaged by rioters so D prepared petrol bombs for protection
LP - future cases SD was available as the threat was sufficiently imminent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Malnik

A

believed V had stolen his friends car

SD failed as the threat was not imminent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Hussain

A

gang burgled house and ran off but D chased them fracturing ones skull
SD failed as the threat had passed not imminent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Keane

A

D started fight and punched V
TJ - SD failed as it was self induced
COA - in future cases it could succeed if V returns violence that’s out of proportion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Hitchens

A

D and a women shared a flat, boyfriend tried breaking in, D hit V to prevent him coming in
TJ - SD failed as V was an innocent party
COA - SD could succeed where an innocent party is a threat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Julien

A

COA - D must demonstrate he is unwilling to fight and make a physical withdrawal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Bird

A

party - ex boyfriend lunged and bottled him causing him to lose his eye
COA - SD succeed, you know longer needed to show retreat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Clegg

A

joyrider failed to stop at a checkpoint - solider shot it killing a passenger
SD - failed as the danger had passed, force wasn’t reasonable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Whyte & Palmer - objective

A

COA - D unable to way up the niceties of any situation and act of instinct, taking into account D’s state of mind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Scarlett - subjective

A

drunk man refused to leave so D threw him down the stairs - died
not liable as he believed that the force was reasonable in the circumstance - subjective to D

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Owino

A

husband injured his wifes head and thumb as he claimed he was attacking her
TJ - failed to follow Scarlett
COA - held the test was not subjective but objective - Whyte and Palmer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Martin

A

burgled farmer, shot the 2 burglars

SD failed as the force was excessive - psychiatric disorders never succeed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Canns and Oye

A

COA confirmed Martin

17
Q

mistake

A

defence if he made an honest mistake
1 - did D honestly believe he had to use force in self defence
2 - was the degree of force deemed reasonable

18
Q

Gladstone Williams

A

grabbed a man who was attacking a young boy for mugging an older lady
SD succeeded as he made a mistake in the prevention of crime - reasonable force was used

19
Q

O’ Grady

A

drank 8 bottles of cider and thought his friend was attacking him so he hit him - died
SD failed as they charged him with a basic crime. guilty of manslaughter

20
Q

Hatton

A

drank 20+ pints and he attacked and killed a man as he thought he was been attacked with a 5ft sword
SD - failed
COA - picked up the obiter that intoxication is no defence. guilty of murder