Semester B Flashcards
Agnes is an 84-year-old lady who presents with dyspnoea worsening over the last few days. She has come via ambulance from a nursing home and has severe dementia as well as a past history of ischaemic stroke, emphysema, atrial fibrillation and ischaemic heart disease. No history is available from the patient as she is non-verbal following her stroke two years ago. She is afebrile and has a productive sounding cough.
Which of the following is the most likely cause of her dyspnoea?
A. Pulmonary embolism
B. Exacerbation of her emphysema
C. Foreign body inhalation
D. Acute coronary syndrome
B. Exacerbation of her emphysema
Exacerbation of her emphysema is correct, as the others are all acute causes of shortness of breath/dyspnoea whereas her presentation is of a sub-acute nature.
Sally is a 35-year-old lady who has presented with mild dyspnoea and left-sided pleuritic chest pain since returning from London three days ago. She has a small pulmonary embolus reported on CT pulmonary angiogram. She is otherwise well with no other significant medical history.
Which of the following is the most appropriate management of her pulmonary embolus?
A. Immediate thrombolysis
B. Commence anticoagulation with warfarin as the sole agent
C. Enoxaparin at a dose of 40 mg once daily
D. Rivaroxaban 15 mg orally twice daily
D. Rivaroxaban 15 mg orally twice daily
Thrombolysis is only for massive life threatening pulmonary embolus which this is not.
Warfarin should be commenced in conjunction with heparin cover in some form until adequate INR is achieved.
Enoxaparin at 40 mg daily is a preventative and not therapeutic dose.
The Australian Therapeutic Guidelines recommends treating proximal DVT and PE with apixaban or rivaroxaban in preference to warfarin if oral anticoagulation is suitable (oral anticoagulants are not first-line therapy for VTE during pregnancy or for cancer-associated VTE). It is unlikely that Sally has significant renal impairment at 35 years old, so a NOAC would be the first choice. The Australian Therapeutic Guidelines recommends commencing rivaroxaban at 15 mg orally twice daily for 21 days, then decrease to 20 mg once daily.
Leo is an 88-year-old man with known ischaemic cardiomyopathy and chronic heart failure.
He is on perindopril 10 mg daily, bisoprolol 5 mg daily, rosuvastatin 20 mg daily, aspirin 100 mg daily and rivaroxaban 2.5 mg BD.
He presents with a two week history of progressive exertional breathlessness and puffy ankles, although the viral respiratory infection he had two weeks ago has fully resolved. He is still managing his activities of daily living adequately.
Examination reveals 3 kg weight gain, blood pressure 140/90 mmHg, pulse rate 105 bpm regular, JVP 3 cm raised, bilateral basal lung crepitations and pitting oedema to his mid shins bilaterally.
What is the most helpful medication change for Leo right now?
A. Up-titrate his bisoprolol to 10 mg daily and review in two weeks
B. Add frusemide 20 mg mane and review in a few days
C. Change the perindopril to ivabradine because of his tachycardia
D. Add irbesartan 75 mg daily
B. Add frusemide 20 mg mane and review in a few days
Rationale
Up-titrating his bisoprolol would probably help, but it should be in smaller increments e.g. 1.25 or 2.5 mg steps, and will not address his current fluid overload as immediately
He is fluid over-loaded so a diuretic is indicated as an add-on medication to give him prompt symptom relief
Ivabradine is an add-on to an ACEI, mineralocorticoid receptor agonist or beta blocker at maximal doses, in HFrEF with persistent tachycardia. Leo is not at maximal betablocker, and his tachycardia may be transient
Angiotensin receptor antagonists replace ACEIs. This combination is reno-toxic and increases adverse cardiac outcomes.
Nigel is a 25 year old who you recently diagnosed with pericarditis, and he is seeing you today for follow up in the general practice, 10 days after his ED visit, after missing his planned review a few days before due to work. At the time of the ED visit, he was commenced on colchicine, 500 microg BD and ibuprofen 600 mg TDS, the latter of which he is due to down-titrate in four days. He states he’s still uncomfortable and unable to lie down properly, and it doesn’t seem like anything has gotten better.
What is the next most appropriate step?
A. Consideration of admission/specialist referral
B. Continue ibuprofen at 600 mg TDS for another two weeks
C. Switch from ibuprofen to aspirin
D. Commence prednisolone, 1 mg/kg/day
A. Consideration of admission/specialist referral
Nigel has pericarditis that hasn’t responded to 7 days of treatment, which is concerning and he should then be reassessed with consideration of both the diagnosis and specialist input. While glucocorticoids may be used in these situations, they present their own risks as well as frequent reoccurrence of pericarditis when ceased, specialist input is desirable. There would be little evidence for longer higher-dose NSAID or switching from one NSAID to another in this situation.
Maria is a 35-year-old woman from the Northern Territory. She presents with a moist productive cough that has been present for over six weeks. You have excluded influenza with nasal swabs. She has been on two courses of oral antibiotics. The cough is intermittent and not associated with exercise. She is not on any regular medications and does not have asthma. She has never smoked.
What is the next best step in her management?
A. Reassurance that the cough will improve over time
B. Consider chest X-ray
C. Start her on another course of antibiotics
D. Spirometry
B. Consider chest X-ray
Maria has a chronic cough that is not improving, so it would be wise to investigate for a cause. Chest X-ray would be the most likely next step followed by further investigations depending on progress. Chest X-ray can help look for some causes of chronic cough including pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary fibrosis, tuberculosis, bronchiectasis, lung cancer and aspiration pneumonia. Maria is not a known smoker and not asthmatic, so spirometry is also an option to consider following a chest X-ray, if symptoms persist.
Morrison is a 55-year-old Aboriginal man who has been diagnosed with bronchiectasis. He has had six acute exacerbations in the last 12 months treated with antibiotics, including two hospital admissions for intravenous antibiotics. His last sputum microscopy culture sensitivities (MCS) result grew Pseudomonas aeruginosa. He is on a regular bronchodilator. He has no haemoptysis. He has gained 3 kg in the last year.
What feature in his presentation would prompt you to refer Morrison to a respiratory physician?
A. Frequent use of a bronchodilator
B. Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated in sputum
C. Six courses of antibiotics in the last 12 months
D. Weight gain in the past 12 months
C. Six courses of antibiotics in the last 12 months
A frequent need for antibiotics, such as more than 3 to 4 courses of antibiotics within 12 months, is an indication for seeking a respiratory physician as suggested by therapeutic guidelines.
Regular use of a bronchodilator would not be an indication unless it was associated with a rapid progression of symptoms and increased use.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa would not be considered an unusual organism to isolate in the sputum and therefore would not warrant referral of its own accord, unless it was resistant.
Weight gain is a positive feature of the clinical history in this case; an inability to maintain weight would indicate a clinical deterioration of bronchiectasis that may require referral to a specialist.
The following are suggested indications for seeking respiratory physician opinion:
Rapid progression of disease or symptoms
Disease requiring hospitalisation
Severe respiratory symptoms or lack of response to current treatment
Frequent need for antibiotics, such as more than 3 to 4 courses of antibiotics within 12 months
Resistant or unusual organisms isolated in sputum
Haemoptysis
Clinical deterioration indicated by
Inability to maintain weight
Declining lung function.
52-year-old Winston presents with acute severe unremitting “burning” jaw pain for 60 minutes, unaffected by position, jaw, neck or arm movement, and associated with sweating and nausea. He has no chest pain and his ECG is normal. His oxygen saturations are 98 % on room air and blood pressure 127/82 mmHg.
What is the next most appropriate step in his management?
A. Administer oxygen via Hudson mask
B. Treatment with an antacid
C. Treatment with sublingual glyceryl trinitrate (GTN)
D. Perform a chest X-ray
C. Treatment with sublingual glyceryl trinitrate (GTN)
The routine use of supplemental oxygen is no longer recommended in the patient with acute myocardial ischaemia. Oxygen therapy is indicated for patients with hypoxia (oxygen saturation <93 %) and those with evidence of shock to correct tissue hypoxia. This presentation has features strongly indicative of acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina despite the absence of chest pain. The acute onset, the unremitting nature, the duration, the absence of local factors to influence pain and the systemic upset all strongly suggest an ischaemic myocardial origin. Therefore, the next most appropriate step of those listed is treatment with sublingual GTN. This should happen before a chest X-ray is conducted. Treatment with an antacid is inappropriate as the presentation should be treated as possible cardiac chest pain.
Jillian is 68-year-old lady who is brought in to the emergency department via ambulance with acute shortness of breath. She has a blood pressure of 80/40 mmHg, respiratory rate 40 breaths/minute, oxygen saturations 90 % on room air and an irregularly irregular heart rate of 130 bpm.
Which of these is the next most appropriate step in her management?
A. Administering intravenous metoprolol 1-2mg
B. Immediate electrical cardioversion
C. Ensuring a patent airway
D. Commencing non-invasive ventilation
C. Ensuring a patent airway
The stem is suggestive of an unstable patient with atrial fibrillation. Electrical cardioversion is the recommended treatment, however, resuscitation always begins by ensuring a patent airway. Intravenous or oral metoprolol are recommended as first line therapy for rate control of atrial fibrillation of more than 48 hours duration in stable patients; this patient is clearly unstable. Non-invasive ventilation may be appropriate but ensuring a patent airway is a higher priority.
25-year-old Lara is brought in to the emergency department with acute shortness of breath and wheeze. She cannot speak and appears frightened with an audible stridor and increased work of breathing. Her respiratory rate is 42 breaths/minute. She has a significant bilateral expiratory wheeze on lung auscultation. Her blood pressure is 70/40 mmHg. High flow oxygen is being applied by the nurse.
The next most appropriate step in her management is:
A. Nebulised salbutamol 5 mg
B. Administer intramuscular adrenaline 0.5 mg
C. Nebulised adrenaline 5 mg
D. Intravenous normal saline bolus 20 mL/kg
B. Administer intramuscular adrenaline 0.5 mg
Lara has the three clinical features of life-threatening anaphylaxis:
Laryngeal oedema (manifested as stridor and respiratory distress)
Bronchospasm (expiratory wheeze)
Hypotension.
Anaphylaxis is a severe hypersensitivity reaction characterised by cardiovascular collapse and respiratory compromise. Most patients will have an associated rash, but some will not.
The management of anaphylaxis begins with a high index of suspicion and requires a rapid assessment and decision-making process, often with a minimal amount of information.
Immediate intervention is essential to prevent deterioration and death. After assessing the airway and applying high-flow oxygen, the immediate management of anaphylaxis is the administration of adrenaline IM.
Nebulised adrenaline can be used as an adjunct for symptomatic treatment of stridor or bronchospasm.
Salbutamol is not the correct choice as it is not part of the management of anaphylaxis.
Intravenous normal saline can be used after the administration of IM adrenaline for severe hypotension in anaphylaxis.
Kevin is a 65-year-old male with known chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who presents with an acute worsening of his chronic shortness of breath. His chronic cough is unchanged. He has a respiratory rate of 30 breaths/minute and an oxygen saturation of 85 % on room air. His venous blood gas reveals a pCO2 of 62 mmHg. His chest X-ray is normal.
The most appropriate management is:
A. Non-invasive ventilation with bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP)
B. Continuous positive pressure ventilation
C. Commence oral amoxicillin and doxycycline
D. Administer intravenous hydrocortisone 100 mg
A. Non-invasive ventilation with bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP)
The use of non-invasive ventilation in COPD results in more rapid clinical improvement with decreased hospital stay and is associated with lower mortality, decreased complications and lower rate of intubation.
BiPAP is preferred to CPAP in COPD as the additional inspiratory pressure improves ventilation and aids in removing the pCO2, correcting hypercapnia.
It is currently recommended that antibiotic therapy should not be used unless the patient has clinical signs of infection with increased purulent sputum or volume of sputum in associated with increased dyspnoea.
Steroids should be administered orally where possible.
Brian is a 29-year-old Aboriginal male who has a past history of IV drug use but no significant medical conditions. He has however, recently been released from the local prison where he served two years. He is now in a new relationship and would like to be screened for hepatitis B.
In order to be eligible for the Medicare rebate for all of HBsAg, anti-HBs and anti-HBc, which of the following would be appropriate to write on the pathology request form?
A. Nothing needs to be written
B. “Significant risk factors for chronic hepatitis B”
C. “Patient/partner concern”
D. It doesn’t matter what is written as these items are not Medicare rebatable
B. “Significant risk factors for chronic hepatitis B”
These pathology tests are Medicare-rebatable but there must be appropriate clinical justification documented on the pathology request form. Patient and/or partner concern is not sufficient in itself. Brian has several risk factors for hepatitis B including being from a priority population for screening and previous IVDU.
Clive is a 53 year old man who attends your clinic with his wife, Tania. He’s been feeling more tired than usual, and you decide, after further history and examination, to complete some blood tests, including an FBC, U&Es and LFTs. Some key results include:
Analyte Result
Platelets 83 x 109/L (150-400)
AST 76 U/L (<35)
ALT 54 U/L (<40)
You decide, based on the elevated ALT and AST, to screen Clive for hepatitis B and C, when he discloses that he used heroin IV a couple of times in his late teens. On previous examination his liver felt firm with a somewhat nodular edge. The following results return:
Analyte Result
Hepatitis C Ab Positive
Hepatitis C RNA PCR (qualitative) Positive
You discuss the result with Clive. What is your next step?
A. Discuss asking Tania in for testing
B. Commence a 12 week course of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir
C. Complete HCV genotyping
D. Refer to hepatologist/gastroenterologist
D. Refer to hepatologist/gastroenterologist
Clive has signs of cirrhosis, including a firm, nodular liver, and his APRI and FIB-4 scores (2.693 and 6.60, respectively) are strongly suggestive of advanced cirrhosis. Referral to a hepatologist/gastroenterologist for further assessment for his cirrhosis, and to treat his hepatitis C, would be advisable.
Hepatitis C genotyping is an optional step, now, but may be considered in some cases. With cirrhosis, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir may need to be supplemented with ribavirin, usually not suitable for general practitioner care. While not the first consideration, reflex testing of Tania and their children, should Tania also be hepatitis C positive, would be required.
Mavis is a 71-year-old retiree who presents to you with a five-day history of constipation. She has had difficulty passing stools which were hard, large and dry. You recommend an adequate fluid intake, a healthy diet, improved toileting posture and regular exercise.
What is the most appropriate first line laxative to prescribe for her?
A. Bisacodyl 5 mg tablets (Dulcolax), two nocte orally
B. Pear juice, 1 cup daily, orally
C. Psyllium mucilloid (Metamucil), 1 teaspoonful daily, orally
D. Sodium phosphate (Fleet) enema, nocte
C. Psyllium mucilloid (Metamucil), 1 teaspoonful daily, orally
Psyllium, a bulking agent, is a typical starting point. Pear juice, a softener and mild stimulant, might also be an option though caution for Mavis’ other comorbidities, especially diabetes, and the cost may be more than other agents. Bisacodyl and sodium phosphate are both stimulants, and usually third line options.
Nigel is a 35-year-old taxi driver with a two-day history of rapidly progressive perianal pain and now has malaise, fever and a very painful lump. Examination reveals a red, hot, tender swelling in the perianal area, involving the local gluteal soft tissue. You diagnose perianal abscess.
What do you recommend for Nigel?
A. Sitz baths and await spontaneous drainage
B. As above and oral antibiotics
C. Incision and drainage under local anaesthetic in your rooms
D. Admit for incision and drainage under general anaesthetic
D. Admit for incision and drainage under general anaesthetic
Deep extension of the abscess is to be avoided, so delay in definitive treatment is not recommended
Oral antibiotics are not effective for abscesses. Drainage is recommended
The precise focus of the deep infection is not readily evident from the surface
Exploration under anaesthetic is the best way to drain the deeper aspects of the abscess and prevent fistulae.
Joshua is a 35-year-old butcher who presents to you with constipation for the past week. He reports passing two stools over the past week, both type 1 stools, painful defecation with blood on the toilet paper. No abnormalities are notable on physical examination.
Which aspect of his history is included in the Rome III diagnostic criteria for functional constipation?
A. Irregular motions
B. Fewer than three defecations per week
C. Blood on toilet paper
D. Painful defecation
B. Fewer than three defecations per week
The Rome III criteria for functional constipation must include two or more of the following:
Straining during at least 25 % of defecations
Lumpy or hard stools in at least 25 % of defecations
Sensation of incomplete evacuation for at least 25 % of defecations
Sensation of anorectal obstruction/blockage for at least 25 % of defecations
Manual maneuvers to facilitate at least 25 % of defecations, e.g. digital evacuation, support of the pelvic floor
Fewer than three defecations per week
There are insufficient criteria for irritable bowel syndrome.
Julie is a 62-year-old teacher who has recently presented with chronic constipation despite increasing fibre and fluid intake as well as daily exercise. In the past 6 months she was commenced on medication for hypertension, type 2 diabetes and osteoarthritis.
Which of the following medications is most likely to be contributing to her chronic constipation?
A. Prazosin
B. Metformin
C. Verapamil
D. Paracetamol
C. Verapamil
Examples of drugs that commonly cause constipation from eTG:
Opioids
Drugs with anticholinergic effects, e.g. oxybutynin, trihexyphenidyl [benzhexol], tricyclic antidepressants, clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine
5-HT3–receptor antagonists, e.g. ondansetron
Aluminium- and calcium-containing antacids
Oral calcium supplements
Oral iron supplements
Verapamil
Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues, e.g. liraglutide, semaglutide.
Greg, a 45-year-old man who is otherwise usually well and not on any regular medication, presents with gastroenteritis. He ate fried rice from a market stall yesterday evening. The illness began with 4-5 episodes of vomiting overnight and progressed to profuse watery diarrhoea and abdominal cramps this morning. There is no blood in the stool, and he does not have a fever.
The most likely pathogen is:
A. Norovirus
B. Bacillus cereus
C. Staphylococcus aureus
D. Salmonella spp. (non-typhoidal)
B. Bacillus cereus
Greg’s symptoms are consistent with a toxin-mediated infectious gastroenteritis i.e. a short incubation period beginning with vomiting and progressing to profuse watery diarrhoea and abdominal cramps. Bacillus cereus is a common pathogen causing food poisoning from eating contaminated fried rice.
Juliette, a 32-year-old scientist, presents with a one-week history of abdominal pain (mild to moderate intensity) and diarrhoea, passing three to four blood containing small volume motions per day. On further questioning, she has been having episodes of abdominal pain and diarrhoea for about two months. Over this time, she has also been feeling generally unwell with fatigue, joint pains, a decreased appetite and has had one to two kilograms weight loss. She has no significant past history, does not take any regular medications and has not travelled overseas recently.
Juliette does not look toxic, observations are within normal ranges, and she has mild generalised abdominal tenderness without guarding. The rest of her abdominal examination, including PR, is normal.
Initial investigations including FBC, ESR, CRP, stool microscopy and faecal calprotectin all point towards a diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease.
You arrange for her to have urgent gastroenterology review and endoscopy.
Once the diagnosis is confirmed, the most appropriate initial management (in consultation with her specialist) is likely to be:
A. Dietary advice, including referral to a dietitian
B. Treatment with a 5-aminosalicylate preparation both orally and rectally
C. Supportive treatment, including fluids, analgesia, loperamide, peppermint oil, prebiotic
D. High dose oral steroids
D. High dose oral steroids
History, examination and initial investigations all point to a likely diagnosis of Crohn’s disease in this case. Clinically, this is a moderately severe presentation due to the number of stools passed per day, the intensity of her abdominal pain, the presence of one extra-intestinal manifestation (joint pains) and mild weight loss, without signs of systemic toxicity or anaemia. GESA recommends using oral prednisone 40 mg daily (and tapering off over 6-8 weeks once achieving a clinical response) for induction therapy for mild to moderate Crohn’s disease, once diagnosis is confirmed, with consultation with gastroenterology for follow up.
You are working in a rural emergency department. Your next patient, Erica, a 54-year-old presents with severe abdominal pain on a background of a multi-day alcohol binge. The pain is sharp/stabbing in her left upper quadrant radiating around to her back. The pain is exacerbated when she tries to eat or drink anything. On examination she is very tender in the left upper quadrant but there are no signs of peritonism.
Which of the following test results would suggest an increased mortality rate?
A. Blood glucose >8 mmol/L at admission
B. Fall in her haematocrit by >10 % at 48 hours
C. Serum lipase >50000 U/L at any time
D. Presence of gallstones on ultrasound
B. Fall in her haematocrit by >10 % at 48 hours
Based on the Ranson criteria a fall of her haematocrit of >10 % at 48 hours is associated with an increased mortality when it is combined with other test results. The Ranson criteria are as follows:
At admission:
Age in years > 55 years
WBC count > 16 x 109/L
Blood glucose > 11.11 mmol/L
Serum AST > 250 U/L
Serum LDH > 350 U/L.
Within 48 hours:
Serum calcium <2.0 mmol/L
Hematocrit fall >10 %
Oxygen (hypoxemia, PaO2 < 60 mmHg)
Urea increased by ≥1.8 mmol/L after IV fluid hydration
Sequestration of fluids > 6 L.
A score of 3 or more is associated with an elevated mortality risk:
Score 0 to 2 : 2 % mortality
Score 3 to 4 : 15 % mortality
Score 5 to 6 : 40 % mortality
Score 7 to 8 : 100 % mortality.
Steven, 60 years old, a long-term patient with a long history of heavy alcohol use and several admissions for acute pancreatitis, presents numerous times with a constant dull ache in his abdomen, more so in the LUQ. The pain is always present with intermittent sharp flares. Extensive investigations and his history suggest chronic pancreatitis.
Which of the following tests would be best to show if he has pancreatic enzyme deficiency?
A. Serum lipase
B. Serum amylase
C. Blood glucose
D. Faecal elastase
D. Faecal elastase
Elastase is an enzyme that is secreted by the pancreas and is excreted in the feces. When pancreatic insufficiency is present the amount of elastase in the stool will be decreased.
Jane is an 18-year-old female with fatigue, who suffers from occasional loose stools. She often experiences abdominal bloating, and has lost five kilograms in the past year. Her initial results come back as follows:
Haemoglobin 108 (115-160g/L)
Haematocrit 0.337 (0.350-0.450L/L)
WBC 7.4 (4.0-11.0 x 109/L)
Platelets 347 (150-400 x 109/L)
MCV 74 (78-100fL)
RBC 3.4 (3.8-5.8 x1012/L)
MCH 23.7 (27-32pg)
MCHC 320 (310-370g/L)
RDW 17.3 (11.5-15)
Reticulocytes low
Serum iron 70 (80-200ug/dL)
Serum TIBC 400 (80-200ug/dL)
Serum ferritin 5 (12-250ug/dL)
B12 500 (138-652pmol/L)
TSH 2.61 (0.32-4.00mIU/L)
COMMENT
Slight hypochromasia, slight microcytosis
The next most important investigation is:
A. Duodenal biopsy
B. Serum folate levels
C. Total IgA level
D. Faecal occult haemoglobin
A. Duodenal biopsy
Jane has the classic tetrad of diarrhoea, weight loss, iron deficiency and abdominal bloating indicating coeliac disease.
Her blood test results are consistent with an iron deficiency anaemia, which is likely to be caused by coeliac disease in this case.
The key investigation for coeliac disease is endoscopy and duodenal biopsy to demonstrate villous atrophy.
Serum folate levels are likely to be low, but are not as important as a duodenal biopsy in this case.
Total IgA levels should be requested when requesting IgA antibodies as part of the work-up for coeliac disease, including specific coeliac antibodies, as a reduced total IgA level could give falsely low antibody results.
However, with a strong clinical suspicion of coeliac disease as in this case, performing duodenal biopsy is still the most important investigation and would likely be performed even if serum IgA antibodies were not elevated.
Oliana is a 22-year-old Pacific Islander whose primary complaint is fatigue. Her full blood count demonstrates a haemoglobin of 105 g/L, MCV of 75 fL (normal range 78-100) and MCH of 25 pg (normal range 27-32) with a low serum ferritin.
The next most important step is to:
A. Start oral iron supplements
B. Start parenteral iron
C. Perform haemoglobin electrophoresis
D. Encourage diet rich in iron
C. Perform haemoglobin electrophoresis
Oliana is from an ethic background with an increased carrier frequency of haemoglobinopathy, and requires haemoglobin electrophoresis to exclude thalassaemia. Thalassaemia may co-exist with iron deficiency. If the initial haemoglobin electrophoresis is normal, the current Australian guidlelines recommending treating the iron deficiency and then re-testing.
Juliette is on chemotherapy after hemicolectomy for colon cancer. She is losing weight from anorexia, nausea and vomiting despite prophylactic ondansetron and rescue metoclopramide 10 mg tds.
The next best step in her management would be to:
A. Arrange a dietitian to assess her and recommend meal replacements e.g ensure and supplements
B. Discuss her problems with the medical oncologist
C. Reduce the chemotherapy dose by a third and assess her progress
D. Add dexamethasone 4 mg mane for it’s antiemetic benefits
B. Discuss her problems with the medical oncologist
There are many possible causes for her weight loss, so simply adding meal replacement drinks without a diagnosis is unwise. Some supplements can exacerbate diarrhoea in certain situations, which could exacerbate her weight loss problem.
Likewise, dexamethasone can have antiemetic benefits in chemotherapy, but treatment without understanding the cause of her symptoms is not best practice.
It may be that Juliette needs her chemotherapy dose adjusted, but this is a decision to be made by or with her oncologist. Thus discussion with her oncologist is the best option.
Jennifer is a 55-year-old who has noticed a marked reduction of colostomy output and some abdominal distension over the past few days.
What is the next most appropriate step in her management?
A. Assess for stoma stenosis or bowel obstruction
B. Prescribe aperients and an increased fluid intake
C. Recommend a higher fibre intake and arrange dietitian referral
D. Order a stoma flush out
A. Assess for stoma stenosis or bowel obstruction
Jennifer has new symptoms so she needs assessment for the underlying cause. It may be that she simply needs to manage constipation with an improved intake of fibre or fluids, the help of aperients or even a stoma flush out, but if she has a post surgical stenosis or tumour-related obstruction, constipation treatments would be unhelpful.