sensory and perception Flashcards

(51 cards)

1
Q

Sensation:

A

sensory signals reaching the detectors in our bodies, reaching our brain (light waves hitting retina, sound waves hitting eardrum)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Perception:

A

process by which the brain selects, organizes, and interprets the sensory information that it receives from the sense organs

What we perceive is not sometimes what our body sense

Our brain is sometimes interpreting the stimulus that is not what it actually is

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Prior experience has impact on perception-> cultural experience should matter too

A

Reliable differences in:

Susceptibility to optical illusions
Pictorial depth perception
Object vs.field focus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Susceptibility to optical illusions

A

Optical illusions reflect different aspects of physical environment
Differences in physical environment-> differences in susceptibility
Ie : carpentered world hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Horizontal-vertical illusion:

A

For many people, vertical line looks longer than horizontal line

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Foreshortening hypothesis:

A

Higher susceptibility to horizontal-vertical illusion for people who reside in more “open environment”

For people in open environments they recognize that when vertical line extends into horizon, it doesn’t end it keeps going

When you see vertical line going further away, you assume that it goes further away, so you add length to it in your head, even though there is no more length

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

depth cues

A

1)relative size of objects
2)object superimposition
3)vertical position
4)linear perspective
5)texture gradient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

1)The relative size of objects

A

Objects that are closer to us are bigger than objects further away

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

2)object superimposition

A

Objects that are closer to us is superimposed onto the object that’s farther away from us, covering the object

The person covering is closer to us than the person being covered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

3)vertical position

A

Objects that are higher up on a 2-D medium, we tend to perceive as being further away from us

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

4)linear perspective

A

When you have 2 parallel lines and put them on a 2-d medium, they recede into a vanishing point into the distance to show depth

Linear perspective is the view of viewer
Vanishing point used to draw your attention to something

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

5)a texture gradient

A

There is more detail when something is closer to us and the texture becomes grainer when something becomes further and further away from us

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Western education’s promotion of sensitivity to depth cues becomes at a young age kids are taught to draw drawings that show a lot of depth cues

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

one way to test western promotion of depth cues

A

Seeing how quickly people interpret the “impossible figure” (ie: two prong trident: there are 3 prongs but visually it only looks like theres 2)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

impossible figure results of the 3 prongs

A

Exposure to western education have more difficulty interpreting impossible figure
~~It requires much more time copying the figure

Non western people see this image as just curves and lines not so much depth, so they are able to copy the image more quickly with fewer errors

Differences across cultural environments not just seen in isolated examples

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

differences in perspective on 2-d medium

A

one point perspective and oblique perspective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

One point perspective

A

Everything goes into one vanishing point

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Oblique perspective(not in perspective):

A

everything drawn in parallel lines

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

horizons:

A

Cultural differences in where horizon is placed (some cultures have clear horizon, some cultures don’t)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Focus on “object” vs “field”

A

People from different cultural environments tend to differ on focusing on focal object vs. the field around the focal object (ie: rod and frame task)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Holistic thinking

A

Perceive scenes and situations as integrated whole, paying more attention to the context

Tend to exhibit more field dependence: tendency to attend to the context that surrounds focal object and relationships among objects in the environment

Exhibited in people in collectivism/interdependence

22
Q

Analytic thinking

A

Perceive objects focusing on specific elements rather than contexts, and use fixed abstract rules to explain and predict behavior

Field independence: tendency to separate focal object from its environment and attend to attributes of the focal object

Exhibited in individualism/independence

23
Q

Researchers went to museums around the world and measured how high up horizons are from the bottom

A

european/western paintings: Horizons don’t go up more than one third from bottom
East asian painting: horizons are more than half way up the painting

european/western drawings: the horizon around 56.37% up from painting
East asian drawing:horizon up 67.16% from painting

Art pieces drawn by children:
Conclusion: cross cultural differences are more exaggerated for professional painting, but not so much across everyday folks, but there is still a difference seen

24
Q

Higher horizons

A

more space to show relations and connects between more objects

More indicative of holistic thinkers
~~Attribution, dialecticism, categorization

25
Analytic thinking style-
more focus on internal, disposition attributions (someone did something because of who they are) Ie if server was bad, they blame the server
26
Holistic thinking style-
more focus on external, contextual information, making situational attributions (someone did something because they were compelled to because of situational factors) If server was bad, they might think the restaurant is busy, the kitchen staff are busy, etc
27
Fundamental attribution error:
tendency to put too much focus on someone’s internal disposition as attributions for one’s behavior, underestimating impact of external/contextual factors Despite explicit external constraints Associated with analytic thinking style
28
Dispositional and situational attribution made by children and adults in US and india
Participants in india make more situational attributions, but American participants make more dispositional attributions Conclusion: some sort of socialization seems to be driving force for this
29
Analytic thinking style:
focus on internal traits and dispositions Leads to tendency to categorize objects based on common traits More characteristic of children from US Grouped based on shared characteristics More likely to group the husband and wife together in a family of 3
30
Holistic thinking style
focus on relationships between objects Leads to tendency to categorize objects based on their connections and relationships More characteristic of children from china and many indigenous groups Groups based on relationships More likely to group the mother and child together in a family of 3
31
Dialecticism:
Thinking style also affects perceptions of patterns and relationships in the world
32
Contradiction:
Things that are opposite to each other Suggest that one is correct the other is incorrect These are inconsistent with each other
33
1)Law of identity: whatever is, is
Each thing has its own attributes and characteristics Ie: apple is an apple bc it has these characteristics x=x
34
2)law of noncontradiction
Can be no acceptance of contradictions Nothing can both be and not be Only one statement can be true, not both-mutually exclusive
35
3)law of excluded middle
Everything must either be or not be All possible outcomes must be included in contradictory statements No third option One of these must be true-collectively exhaustive(must account for all possible outcomes)
36
Tolerance for contradiction: naive dialecticism
East asian tradition has relatively higher acceptance of contradictions
37
Naive dialecticism Based on 3 principles
Principle of change: reality is a changing process, reality is not static Principle of contradiction:because change is constant, contradiction is constant, opposite poles complement and depend on each other for existence Ie A=b, A can also not = b Principle of relationship: bc change and contradiction are constant, everything is related, and can’t be isolated into independent elements
38
Knowledge gap
we have a gap of knowledge between what we have and what we think we have
39
Desirability gap
theres a gap between what we have and what we want to have
40
Action gap
how do we take these gaps and do something about it
41
Income inequality
uneven distribution of income within a population
42
Wealth inequality
Uneven distribution of assets within a population (ie: income, property, cars, business)
43
Health and social problems are worse in more wealth unequal countries
More teenage births, more menta illness, lessl ife expectancy U.S. has the worst and highest income inequality
44
Authoritarianism:
obedience to authority figures Intolerance of minorities Support for more aggressive use of military force More likely to condone illegal government behavior Greater the income inequality, greater the power differential in society Greater experience with power difference, greater its acceptance, perceived naturalness
45
More acceptance of authoritarismism->
more fatalism(thought that things are inevitable) about one’s situation (people feel like they don't need to worry or they are helpless) This breeds less political engagement amongst those with less power: Less political interest Less political discussion Less electoral participation Leads to Greater political inequality
46
Difference SES->
differences in behavior and psychological tendencies
47
The rich:
Have independent self construal High Dispositional attributions High Sense of personal control High Unethical behavior
48
The poor:
Interdependent self construal High Situational attributions High Empathy and help behavior Less engagement with/benefit from edu and occ opportunities This is because in these opportunities, most people are going to be middle class, therefore lower class don't feel seen or belong in these positions
49
People with lower socioeconomic status->
more likely to engage in behavior that are perceived to exacerbate situation
50
people with lower socioeconomic status:
More present-oriented, less future-oriented, more pessimistic about future than higher SES Greater external mortality risk More likely to die from external harmful triggers Greater impulsivity, behaviors that are immediately beneficial Certain psychological outcomes associated with poverty, those outcomes have a impact on behavior Ie: having many children, nonoptimal financial decisions, harmful health behaviors
51