Serious assault Flashcards

1
Q

Section 188(1)

A

WOUNDING WITH INTENT
With Intent to Cause GBH
To Any person
Wounds, Maims, Disfigures or causes GBH
To Any Person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Section 188 (2)

A

WOUNDING WITH INTENT
With Intent to Injure any person or with reckless disregard for the safety of others
Wounds, Maims, Disfigures or causes GBH
To any person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Section 189(1)

A

INJURES WITH INTENT
With Intent to cause GBH
To any person
Injures
Any Person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Section 189 (2)

A

INJURES WITH INTENT
With Intent to Injure any Person or with reckless disregard for the safety of others
Injures
Any Person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Section 191(1)

A

AGGRAVATED WOUNDING
With Intent
(a) to commit or facilitate the commission of any imprisonable offence
(b) to avoid detection of himself, herself or any other person in the commission of any imprisonable offence
(c) to avoid arrest or facilitate the escape of himself, herself or any other person in the commission of any imprisonable offence

Wounds, Maims, disfigures, cause GBH to any person, stupefies or renders unconscious any person or by violent means renders any person incapable of resistance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Intent CL x 2

A

R v Taisalika

The nature of the blow and the gash which it produced point strongly to the presence of the necessary intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Intent
Def

A

Deliberate Act - Specific Result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Injury Def:

A

to cause actual bodily harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Injury CL

A

R v Donavan/McArthur
‘Bodily Harm’ includes any hurt or injury calculated to interfere with the health or comfort of the victim…. it need not be permanent, but, must, no doubt, be more than merely more than transitory and trifling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Doctrine of transferred malice

A

It is not necessary that the person suffering the harm was the intended victim. Mistaken identity or struck wrong target still liable under the doctrine of transferred malice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Aggravated Wounding CL

A

R v TIHI
In addition to one of the specific intents outlined in paragraph (a) - (c) it must be shown that the offender meant to cause the specified harm or foresaw that the actions undertaken by him were likely to expose others to the risk of suffering

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Agg Wounding CL
191(1)(a)

A

R v STURM
Under section 191(1)(a)
It is not necessary for the prosecution to prove the intended crime was actually subsequently committed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

GBH CL

A

DDP V Smith

Bodily harm’ needs no explanation and ‘grevious’ means no more no less than really serious

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

WOUND CL

A

R v WATERS
A wound is a ‘breaking of the skin evidenced by the flow of blood. May be Internal or External.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

DISFIGURES CL

A

R v Rapana and Murray
Disfigures covers not only permanent damage but also temporary damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Section 191(1)(c) CL

A

R v Wati
There must be proof of the commission or the attempted commission of a crime either by the person committing the assault or by the person whose arrest or flight he intends to avoid or facilitate

17
Q

Stupefy CL

A

R v STURM
To stupefy means to cause an effect on the mind or nervous system of a person which really seriously interferes with that persons mental or physical ability to act in any way which might hinder an intended crime

18
Q

R v Crossan

A

Incapable of resistance includes a powerlessness of will as well as physical incapacity