Session 4 - Participatory Policy Instruments Flashcards

Community involvement, and environmental effectiveness (40 cards)

1
Q

What is public participation?

common theme?

A

There are many different forms of public participation but the common theme is that non-state actors are somehow involved in decision making

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How does public participation affect policies?

what parts?

A

it affects the:
- contents and ambition (what they want to achieve)
- Implementation and compliance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What isn’t public participation?

A

Voting in elections

Being active in a political party

Environmental activism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who is involved in public participation?

A

Typical policy people but also other stakeholders:
- politicians, bureaucrats, regulators
- NGOs and movements
- Businesses
- Scientists
- Indigenous communities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why won’t some people be involved in public participation?

A

people may not be interested or even know about an issue.

Sometimes the government unfairly restricts access to public participation like not inviting groups to the table

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the 4 different formats of public participation? How do they work?

A

Electronic consultation - websites, consult portals set up by gov.

Public hearings - one way comm, authority explains what they want to public

Townhall meetings - a discussion - two way communication

Stakeholder group involvements - discussion with an organised group rather than the general public

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the 3 different communication streams in public participation?

A

Information

Consultation

Involvement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explain information as a communication stream in public participation

A

informing the public, but they don’t give their opinions back

a one way method of communication from the authority to the people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Explain consultation as a communication stream in public participation

A

Informing the people then mainly listening to their response

One way communication from the people to the authority.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain involvement as a communication stream in public participation

A

an agency/authority and general public exchanging arguments, both sides listening to the other, deep engagement with the other’s views

two way communication between the authority and the people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain how organisational formats relate to communication streams in public participation

A

some comm streams naturally work better with different formats

e.g. its easier to facilitate true involvement in a townhall meeting rather than over an online portal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How does the Arnstein 8 point scale relate to public participation in enviro policy? (power transfer)

A

This scale was a metaphorical ladder of citizens participation from manipulation -information - partnership - citizen control

different formats/com streams fall at different levels of the ladder e.g. only informing farmers of a decision but not listening to them is still public participation but on the lowest rung

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Discuss decision making in public participation?

How are decisions actually made?

A

How the final decision is made will be different in every case

absolute (>50%) or relative (highest %) majority?

Compromise or consensus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How has the EU incorporated public participation?

Explain the Arhus convention…

A

90s/00s - an international treaty that European countries signed which legally binds public participation in environmental decision making.

every citizen has the right to receive info about the state of their local environment (some exceptions)

and be informed about upcoming decisions

kid of vague about how much input/involvement citizens will actually have on decisions - internet consultations rather than face to face

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How is the Aarhus convention being implemented in the EU

A

a number of directives which are legal acts were developed to make it clear what the requirements are

e.g. 2003 Envrionmental Infromation Directive, public participation dir, water framework dir.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How has the US incorporated public participation?

A

In the 1970s the US was at the forefront of developing environmental and climate policies.

There was criticism that regulators had too much control so legal acts were adapted to ensure regulators had to work with the public.

The national environmental protection act was the first instance of PP and later all other legal acts had to at least consult the wider public.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

How is Australia incorporating public participation?

A

PP is only a key legal requirement for environmental impact assessment e.g. Roe highway expansion

Very rarely a legal requirement, voluntary otherwise

We’re very behind compared to other countries (EU highest standard and US)

18
Q

Explain the Humber River Basin example of public participation

A

2007 - Many different stakeholder interests - swimming, boating, industry etc

Enviro agency was hesitant to make any rulings and raising conflict with conservation plans

Liaison panel was set up for people to discuss the future of the basin/desired outcomes

2 million people were involved because of the flow of the river - many meetings

19
Q

How does public participation influence decisions in environmental policy?

3

A

Counters regulatory capture

Brings in new information

Fosters creativity and deliberation

20
Q

How can public participation influence implementation/compliance of environmental policies

2

A

Procedural justice

informing polluters about new policies

21
Q

How can public participation counter regulatory capture?

A

Brings more eco-friendly actors (greener people) into political decisions

22
Q

How can public participation bring in new info?

A

Policy decisions can be more informed by local knowledge, indigenous, hobbyists etc

hear perspectives from minority communities

23
Q

How can public participation foster creativity and deliberation?

A

Common good orientation (as opposed to own interest orientation)

Through collective decision making - improves quality

encouraging discussion, exchanging arguments, convincing each other, collaboration

24
Q

What is procedural justice?

A

Accepting a policy decision because the process is perceived as fair

even if you don’t agree with the outcome - because you were involved in the deicision you think its more fair

25
what is the formula for improved ambition and implementation of environmental policy making?
greener policy decisions + good policy implementation and compliance = improved environmental conditions
26
Do we have greener envrionrmnetal decisions when made in a participatory setting
46% of the time - NO 36% yes 18% no difference
27
Do we have better compliance with environmental decisions in a participatory setting?
63% of the time - YES 27% no 10% no difference
28
Why doesn't data support the claims of the benfitds opf public participation?
We have a trade-off Regulatory & economic instruments = ambitious decisions with poor compliane Participation = decisions lack ambition, but excellent compliance (becuase of procedural justice)
29
How did Ronald Raegan use participation to his advantage?
He pushed for public participation inenvironmental decision making instead of letting the EPA make decisions. The people who participated didn't care about preserving the environemnt, but their own economic interests.
30
When may people not want a green outcome?
People's livelihood depends on jobs/industries that exploit/degrade/pollute the environment. They don't care about environmental pollution/exploitation/degradation People are uninformed - what damage their actions cause or how measures mitigate them.
31
How does deliberated decision effect ambition? | plus and minus of each argument
+allows the exchange of arguments = people convince each other of more ambitious enviro actions - in theory this could go the other way, enviro irresposnsible people could convice green people to change +people cominto delieration with an open mind - this isnt always the case, some people are just stubborn - this ignores the power dynamics/imbalances of groups of people - some people are just better at arguing than others
32
Describe the Abilene paradox
individuals are likely to agree to decisions in order to conform to a group this can result in decisions being made that no one really wanted on the first place Human beings are't completely rationsal and won't examine every option completely
33
Describe risky shift
The idea that there is a lack of individual responsibility in group situations which can lead to risky deicions being made Being part of a group, ypu don't tend t think ask hard, theres always someone else to blame..
34
What are the 2 examples of how social psychology impacts environmental decision making | the theries/ideas
The Abilene paradox Risky shift
35
What are the strategies used by "professional" participants?
Snow job Good cop Bad cop All nighter
36
Explain the good cop bad cop strategy
The good cop distracts/manipulates the public form their original goal. The good cop isn't always on the envoironments side. e.g. Public wants to save forrest, bad cop wants to log forrest, good cops says lets compromise! how about half half?
37
Explain the snow job strategy
A polluting company buries incriminating info in lots of useless info when asked about it. The people who requested this infor are snowed under all the info and are not able to process it.
38
Explain the all nighter strategy
Keep discussing until other people aren't apart of the dicsussion anymore - by what ever means is applicable to the kind of participation happening. people have to physically leave and can't be there to advocate their perspective at decision time
39
What are the criticisms/risks of public participation?
Everyday people are getting caught in regulatory capture Decisions can be polluted by ignorants Local knowledge may not be significant or important Unwanted group dynamics - group psychology can have unwated effects on decision making.
40
Who are professional participants? | Why are they used?
People pollutors have hired in professional teams to participate in participatory processes. They have uni degrees in these areas, know all the strategies - peopl in the community usually don't have the same skills