Sexual Offences Flashcards

(40 cards)

1
Q

Potential offences under the Sexual Offences Act 2003

A

Rape (s. 1)
Assault by Penetration (s. 2)
Sexual Assault (s. 3)
Causing Sexual Activity without Consent (s. 4)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Rape Actus Reus

A

Penile penetration of the mouth, anus or vagina

Without consent from the victim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Rape is a continuing Act, so if consent is withdrawn at any time and penetration is not also withdrawn then rape starts at that point

A

s. 79

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Conclusive Presumptions

A

s. 76 SOA
- D did the relevant act
- One of a set of circumstances exists
- If an irrefutable lack of consent exists.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Sets of circumstances which the prosecution must prove to give rise to the conclusive presumption of rape

A
  • D deceives V as to the nature or purpose of the act.

- D induces consent impersonating someone known

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

D deceives V as to the nature or purpose of the act

A

R v Williams (singing coach)

R v Dicker (transmission of HIV)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Not guilty of deception of the act for paying a prostitute and then running away

A

Lineker

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The court would be open to convict where D fails to comply with a condition imposed by D

A

To wear a condom (Assange)

To not ejaculate inside her (R(F) v DPP)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Gender deception is considered deception as to the nature or purpose of the act

A

McNally

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

D induces consent impersonating someone known to V

A

R v Elbekkay - best friend pretended to be her boyfriend.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Where the object was ‘abject humiliation’ then there was a conclusive presumption of no consent

A

Devonald

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

If the purpose of was sexual gratification for all parties the D is not to be convicted

A

R v B

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Evidential presumptions

A

S. 75

  • D did the relevant act
  • the circumstances giving rise to the presumption existed at the time of the act
  • that D knew the circumstances existed
  • Lack of consent is presumed unless D can raise an issue to the contrary
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Circumstances that the prosecution must prove in order to give rise to a presumption of rape

A

S.75

  • use or threat of violence to the V or a third party
  • an unlawful detention
  • if the V was asleep or unconsciousness
  • if the V was unable to communicate consent due to physical disability
  • if an overpowering substance was administered to the V
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

D must provide ‘sufficient evidence’ that consent was given.
The prosecution must then move to prove that consent was not given.

A

R v Ciccarelli

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Consent under the SOA

A

s. 74

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Consent must be a free choice

18
Q

V must have the capacity to consent

A

R v Bree - drunken consent is still consent

19
Q

Submission if not consent

20
Q

Mens Rea of Rape

A
  • intentional penetration

- No reasonable belief in consent

21
Q

An honest mistake is not a defence to a reasonable belief in consent

22
Q

Even if D has personality or a psychiatric disorder they still have to be judged by objective standards.

23
Q

When do evidential and presumptive conclusions apply?

A

Both

  • AR: consent
  • MR: no reasonable belief
24
Q

Assault by penetration

A

s. 2 SOA

- violent non-consentual battery

25
AR of Assault by penetration
- Intentional penetration fo the vagina or anus of another person with a part of the body or anything else. - With anything - The act must be sexual - without consent
26
Assault by penetration was considered sexual assault
R v Brian
27
Removing the complainants shoes was not indecent even though he had a foot fetish
R v George
28
Spanking a girl when he had a buttock fetish was indecent
R v Court
29
Deciding if an act is sexual
R v H - would the reasonable person consider the act to be - would the reasonable person consider the conduct of the person to be
30
MR of assault be penetration
- intentional penetration | - no reasonable belief in consent
31
Intoxication does not assist in the denial of fault in assault by penetration
R v Heard
32
Sexual Assault is defined under
s. 3 SOA
33
AR of Sexual Assalt
- touching - an act must be sexual - without consent
34
Touching a persons clothing was considered sexual touching
R v H - grabbing tracksuit
35
MR for Sexual Assault
- Intentional touching | - no reasonable belief in consent
36
Causing a person to engage in sexual activity without consent is defined under
S. 4 SOA
37
AR of engagement in Sexual activity
- causing a person to engage in sexual activity - the act must be sexual - without consent
38
Forcing a boy to masterbate into a condom or he'd hit him with a stick
R v Seargent
39
Causing a person
- must have been an operating and substantial cause R v Cato - more than trifling (R v Smith
40
MR of engagement in sexual activity
- Intentionally causing the activity | - no reasonable belief in consent