Short question Theory Flashcards

1
Q

proxy contest

A

Proxy contest is an attempt by a dissident group of shareholders to gain representation on a firms board of dirctors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

leveraged buyout (

A

A leveraged buyput is the purchase of a company by a small group of investors, financed largely by debt, Often the assets of the company are used as colletaeral to allow cpmpanies to make large aqcuisitions without having to commit a lot of capital

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define Joint Venture

A

A joint venture is a combination of subsets of assets contributed by two or more business entitities for a specific bsuness purpose and a limited duration.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define Direct bankruptcy costs

A

Direct bankruptcy costs are incurred in bankruptcy or reorginaization such as legal adimintrative afire sale sale costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Hubris

A

Hubris refers to the excessive self-confidence (pride, arrogance) of managers causing them to overbid and overpay for a takeover target

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Golden Parachute

A

Golden parachutes are separation provisions of an employment contract that provide for payments to managers under a change-of-control clause. Usually a lump sum payment is involved if the manager loses his\her job.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Convertible Bond

A

A convertible bond is a bond (debt contract) that may be converted into another security (typically equity) at the holder’s option.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Sunk Costs

A

A sunk cost is a cost that has been incurred and cannot be reversed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Equity carve out:

A

A transaction in which a parent firm offers some (typically up to 20%) of ,a subsidiary’s common stock to the general public to bring in a ääsn infusion without loss of control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

A pure stock offer

A

If the shares of the acquiring firm are overvalued, then the aquierer should try to buy thorugh

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Spinoff

A

A transaction in which a company distributes on a pro.rata basis all of the shares it owns in a subsidiary to its own shareholders hereby creating a new public company with (initially) the same proportional equity ownership as the ;parent company

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Vertical merger

A

In vertical mergers, by directly merging with suppliers, a company can decrease reliance and increase profitability. An example of a vertical merger is a car manufacturer purchasing a tire company. Such a vertical merger would reduce the cost of tires for the automaker and potentially expand business to supply tires to competing automakers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Devistiture

A

The partial or full disposal of an investment or asset through sale, exchange, closure or bankruptcy. Divestiture can be done slowly and systematically over a long period of time, or in large lots over a short time period.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Poison Pil

A

A strategy used by corporations to discourage hostile takeovers. With a poison pill, the target company attempts to make its stock less attractive to the acquirer. There are two types of poison pills:

  1. A “flip-in” allows existing shareholders (except the acquirer) to buy more shares at a discount.
  2. A “flip-over” allows stockholders to buy the acquirer’s shares at a discounted price after the merger
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Poison put

A

A bond that allows bondholders to redeem before maturity at a high price should certain, named events take place. These events commonly include restructuring, a leveraged buyout, an attempted hostile takeover, or paying dividends in excess of a certain amount or percentage. Poison-put bonds can act as an anti-takeover measure; they help management discourage takeovers by raising their expense. On the other hand, when the company is going through a difficult time, poison-put bonds can limit management’s restructuring options for the same reason

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Briefly explain the trade off theory of capital structure (60 words)

A

According to the trade-off theory of capital structure, companies optimally trade off the tax shield advantage of debt against the expected bankruptcy costs. The interest repayments on debt are tax deductible. This benefit of debt has to be traded off against the increase in expected bankruptcy costs that result from taking on higher debt levels. Highly levered companies are more likely to go bankrupt.

17
Q

Does it matter for the total firm value whether the firm keeps the debt level constant or whether it keeps the leverage ratio constant Explain your answer?

A

The WACC formular assumes that debt is rebalnced to maintain a constant debt ratio. Rebalancing ties the level of future intrest tax shields to the future value of the company. This makes the tax shield risky. Fixed debt levels however are not necessarily better for stockholders (just because you assume a lower Wacc). Note that, when the debt is rebalanced next years interest tax shields are fixed and, thus, discounted a lower rate. The following years interest is not known with certainty for one year and, hence, is discounted for one year at the higher risky rate and for one year at the lower rate. This is much more realistic sine it recognizes the uncertainty of future evetns

18
Q

Many empirical studies have tested the validity of the trade-off theory of capital-structure’ Whai is the empirical evidence in fiavour (pro) and against (contra) the trade-off theory of capitalstructure

A

Following proxies are empirically associated with low debt ratios
• Tax-loss carry forwards
• Volatility of earnings/market value (business risk)
• Expenditure on marketing, R&D (intangibles)
• MBV (growth opportunities)
Contra:
profitable firms within industry have lower gearing
Above results can be consistent with other theories

19
Q

What are conglomerate mergers

A

A merger between firms that are involved in totally unrelated business activities. There are two types of conglomerate mergers: pure and mixed. Pure conglomerate mergers involve firms with nothing in common, while mixed conglomerate mergers involve firms that are looking for product extensions or market extensions.

20
Q

During which merger wave were conglomerate mergers popular? What has been the performance of these conglomerate mergers and what is the explanation for their performance

A

Third wave: This was seen during the conglomerate merger phase of the 1960s.
Performance was rather poor as synergy effect has been overestimated

21
Q

What theoretical justification can you give for conglomerate mergers?

A

There are many reasons for firms to want to merge, which include increasing market share, synergy and cross selling. Firms also merge to diversify and reduce their risk exposure. However, if a conglomerate becomes too large as a result of acquisitions, the performance of the entire firm can suffer. This was seen during the conglomerate merger phase of the 1960s.

22
Q

What is the “diversification discount, and how can one explain this phenomenon?

A

It is argued that diversified firms trade at a discount relative to similar single segment firms. Diversification discount is usually assumed to be caused by:
• Internal inefficiency and agency
• Increased info asymmetry
• Inneffienct internal capital markets

23
Q

State and discuss the nature of 3 different takeover defenses

A

1)Defensive restructuring:
“scorched earth policy”, selling crown jewels
Issue new equity to “friendly” shareholders
2)Poison pills: warrants issued to existing shareholders giving them right to buy firm securities at very low prices in event of tender offer
3)Poison puts: allows bondholders to sell bonds at par to issuer or its successor
4)Golden parachutes (protects management)

24
Q

what is the difference between a cash offer and a stock offer (in the context of takeovers)?

A

In a stock deal, a portion or the entire amount of the acquisition price is paid in shares of the acquiring company. In a cash deal, the acquisition price is paid in cash. In stock deals, buyers share both the value and the risks of the transaction with the shareholders of the company they acquire in proportion to the percentage of the combined company the acquiring and selling shareholders each will own. In cash transactions, acquiring shareholders take on the entire risk that the expected synergy value embedded in the acquisition premium will not materialize. Sellers can often achieve a higher price for their companies by accepting stock deals

25
Q

Firms A and B are each considering an unanticipated new investment opportuninty that will maginally increase the value of the firm and will also increase the firms level of diversification. Firm A is unlevered, and firm B has a capital structure of 50% debt. Assuming that the sahrehplders contril te firm, will either firmake the investment.?

A

From the optiom prcing model we know that the greater diversification created by the new investment will lower the rate of return variance of the firms assets. If the firm is not levered the prokect will b e accepted because it increases shareholders weltaht (although marginally), which is identical to the value of the all equity firm. The project has positive NPBV. However, with a levered firm. Shareholders equity may be though of as a call option on the value of the firm. Consequently, the lower variance of return on the assets of the firm will decrease the value of the call. Of the decrease is large enough to offset the small positive NPV of the project, it will be rejected by hareholders of the levered firm.

26
Q

What are the empirical problems involved in testing for the effect of capital structure on the value of the firm?

A

The main empirical problem is that firms typically change their capital structure as the same time that they change their portfolio of assets by taking on new investment. Cosequently, the effects are indistunishable. Changes in the value of the firm may be attributed to investment policy, financial policy or both. In addition to this fundamental problem, there are problems of measurement error. For example, how can one measure future growth in the form, or expected rates of return, or differences in risk? Finnaly, the empirical work frequently uses cross-section regressions which are liekyl to have highly correlated residuals. This wekanes the power of the statiscal significance test.

27
Q

Supporse that new banking regulation imposes higher capital requirements on banks. How would this affect banks decisions to invest in new porjects?

A

An increase in capital requirements would reduce the target leverage ratio, which in turn would increase the WACC, since the equations below show the a reduction in the target leverage ratio, will decrease the tax shield saving and hence increase the WACC.:In increase in WACC would in turn raise the hurdle rate for firms procjects, causing more projects to be turned down, and investments to decrease

28
Q

Regulators acrcross the world have started to impose higher capital requirements on banks as a result of the recent banking crisis. How will these new requirements affect future lending?

A

It it lieky that the cost imposed to all banks by higher captal requirements will be bassed on to borrower. This means that the spread between lending rates and the base rate may be much higher than what used to be the case before the crisis. In addition, other credit terms (such as the amount of collateral required) may become tougher too. As a result credit may become less freely available

29
Q

The WACC formular assumes that debt is rebalances to maintain a constant debt ratio D/B. Rebalancing ties the level of future interest tax shields to the future value of the company. His maes the tax shield risky. Does that mean that fixed debt levels (no rebalancing) are better fore stockholders.?

A

Fixed debt level, without rebalancing, are not nexessarily better for stockholders. Note that, when the debt is rebalances , next years interest tax shields are fixed and, thus, discounted at a lower rate. The followings years interst is not known with certainy for one year and, hence, is discounted for one year at the higher riky rate and fr one year at the lower rate. This is much morerealistic sind it recognizes the uncertainty of future events.

30
Q

Management Buyout

A

MBO is a process by which the substantial part of the shares of the company are purchased by the Executives of the company from the promoters
When the promoters are planning to sell a firm, the managerial personnel may buy the same from the promoters

31
Q

Market Portfolio

A

A theoretical bundle of investments that includes every type of asset available in the world financial market, with each asset weighted in proportion to its total presence in the market. The expected return of a market portfolio is identical to the expected return of the market as a whole.

32
Q

Credit Spread

A

A credit (or quality) spread is the difference in yields between two issues that are similar in all respects except for credit rating. An example of a credit spread is the difference in yields between long AA rated general obligation municipal bonds and long A rated general obligation (an intermarket spread as well).

33
Q

Credit Spread Risk

A

Refers to the fact that the default risk premium required in the market for a given rating can increase, even while the yield on treasury securities of similar maturity remains unchanged. An increase in this credit spread increases the required yield and decreases the price of a bond.

34
Q

CMO

A

CMOs are created from mortgage passthough certificated and referred to as derivitave mortgage back secituties, since they are derived from a simpler MBS structure. A CMO issue has different tranches, , each of which has a different type of claim to the cash flows from the pool of mortgages.

35
Q

Prepayment Risk

A

Is similar to call risk. Premayts are picipal repayments in excess of those required on amortizing loans, such as resentila mortgages. If rates fall, causing prepayments to increase, an investor must reinvest these prepayments at the new lower rate

36
Q

Covenenat and Example

A

A promise in an indenture, or any other formal debt agreement, that certain activities will or will not be carried out. Covenants are most often represented in terms of financial ratios which must be maintained for businesses which lend, such as a maximum debt-to-asset ratio or other such ratios