Should Christians have a mission to convert those of no faith? Flashcards
(12 cards)
Introduction
- What does the question cause problems for
- What does it mean for a multi faith secular society
- Preview thesis
The question of whether Christians should seek to convert those of no faith is a complex and controversial issue in modern religious pluralism. Christianity has traditionally emphasised evangelism, rooted in scriptural mandates such as the Great Commission (Matthew 28:19).
However, in a multi-faith and often secular society, such missions can raise ethical, theological, and social concerns. While some documents like Redemptoris Missio and Sharing the Gospel of Salvation advocate respectful proclamation of the Gospel, movements such as Scriptural Reasoning suggest an alternative model rooted in dialogue rather than conversion.
This essay will explore both sides of the debate, evaluating whether such missions are appropriate or necessary today, especially in light of social cohesion, religious tolerance, and inclusivity.
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1: Yes – Christians have a theological and moral duty to convert those of no faith
Paragraph 1: Yes – Christians have a theological and moral duty to convert those of no faith
A01 content
• Redemptoris Missio (1990): Pope John Paul II asserts that inter-religious dialogue is part of the Church’s evangelising mission, which includes those of no faith. It recognises that other religions may contain “whatever is true and holy” but maintains that the Church is the “ordinary means of salvation.” This reflects an inclusivist stance – other faiths may be vehicles of grace, but full salvation is through Christ.
• Sharing the Gospel of Salvation (2010): Church of England document stating that proclaiming the unique revelation of God in Christ is central. Emphasises inclusivism (sections 85-86) while advocating evangelism by example and deed, not coercion.
• Matthew 28:19 – “Go and make disciples of all nations” – direct scriptural command to evangelise, often interpreted to include non-believers and atheists.
Paragraph 1: Yes – Christians have a theological and moral duty to convert those of no faith
Strengths
These sources highlight that mission is rooted in biblical tradition and ecclesial authority. Evangelism is framed not as cultural imperialism but as an act of love and hope, offering others the message of salvation. Respectful mission avoids coercion and is not “selling” a religion but an invitation to grace.
Application to Atheism: Atheists are seen by some Christians as spiritually unfulfilled. In this view, mission brings hope, purpose, and moral clarity to those who lack religious grounding.
Paragraph 1: Yes – Christians have a theological and moral duty to convert those of no faith
Counterargument + Response
Counterargument: Critics argue that even gentle evangelism risks implying the superiority of Christianity, fostering division and disrespect in pluralist societies. Attempts to convert atheists can appear condescending and can reinforce negative stereotypes about religion as dogmatic.
Response: Advocates reply that evangelism, when done with genuine love, humility, and without manipulation, can be deeply transformative and respectful. Sharing the Gospel warns explicitly against “bullying or manipulative tactics,” focusing instead on authentic witness.
Paragraph 2: No – Evangelism risks damaging social cohesion and undermines mutual respect in pluralist societies
A01 content
• Scriptural Reasoning Movement: A form of interfaith dialogue that avoids any attempts at conversion. Instead, it promotes mutual understanding through shared reflection on sacred texts (e.g. discussing marriage or parenting), with an emphasis on respect, openness, and equality between traditions.
• Aimed not at agreement or conversion but enhancing understanding and trust across faiths. Seen as a model for peaceful coexistence.
• Concerns about relativism have been raised – i.e., by treating all religious truths as equally valid, Christians may dilute the truth-claims of their own faith.
Paragraph 2: No – Evangelism risks damaging social cohesion and undermines mutual respect in pluralist societies
Strengths
Strengths: In pluralist and secular societies, such as contemporary Britain, Scriptural Reasoning and dialogue-based approaches help foster social cohesion, reduce religious tensions, and promote shared ethical values. Avoids the pitfalls of appearing culturally or spiritually imperialist.
Paragraph 2: No – Evangelism risks damaging social cohesion and undermines mutual respect in pluralist societies
Application to atheism
Application to Atheism: Open discussion may be more fruitful than missionary approaches. Many atheists prefer rational debate and shared moral dialogue over religious proclamation.
Paragraph 2: No – Evangelism risks damaging social cohesion and undermines mutual respect in pluralist societies
Criticism
Criticism: The practice may lead to theological relativism, weakening Christian commitment to the unique truth of Christ. Furthermore, evangelism is not necessarily incompatible with respect – Christians can still evangelise respectfully, as argued by Redemptoris Missio.
Paragraph 2: No – Evangelism risks damaging social cohesion and undermines mutual respect in pluralist societies
Response
Response: Advocates of interfaith dialogue argue that context matters: in a pluralistic society, a posture of listening rather than converting may be more appropriate and effective. In many cases, living out Christian values may speak louder than words and avoid alienating others.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while Christianity holds a long-standing tradition of mission, modern pluralist societies require a nuanced approach. Evangelism can still be seen as a vital part of Christian identity, particularly when carried out with humility and compassion, as outlined in Redemptoris Missio and Sharing the Gospel of Salvation. However, efforts to convert must avoid coercion and cultural insensitivity. In many cases, interfaith dialogue and practices such as Scriptural Reasoning offer more constructive methods of engagement in a diverse world.
LOA
Therefore, Christians should maintain a mission-oriented outlook, but adapt their methods to prioritise respectful dialogue and mutual understanding. The mission to convert remains relevant, but it must be reformed rather than abandoned, preserving the core Christian imperative while fostering peace in multi-faith societies.
