Slide Decks 1-5 Flashcards
(93 cards)
What is malaria?
A protozoan parasite of the genus Plasmodium that lives within red blood cells
Who has the survival advantage if infected with malaria?
Individuals who are
heterozygous for the sickle cell
mutation
True or False: Social factors influence
human genetic diversity and our knowledge of it
True
What is the goal of scientific literature?
To make a convincing case to its audience (readers or listeners) that the writer is asking an important or at least interesting question, and has found a possible answer to that question.
Define Primary Literature
Articles that describe new studies
Scientists write primary research articles to outline, summarize, and share the details of their own experimental studies.
Define secondary or review literature
Articles/books/book chapters that summarize what others have written or done without doing new studies
What is a benefit of secondary or review literature?
Review articles/ book
chapters summarize primary literature and help readers gain
a broader understanding of a topic or field. Review articles also can lay out the evidence on each side of a controversial field, or competing theories about how a process works
Describe the layout of scientific literature
- Introduction: It can be their own question, a problem that many scientists working in the field know about, or an observation that the current understanding within the field cannot explain. The context for thinking about the question, usually by describing (and citing) what others have seen and said.
- Materials and Methods: If the study is new, the authors will describe how they conducted the research. If its a review article, the author may. describe the scope of what the rest of the article will talk about.
- Evidence to support claims: The evidence can be the data the author collected from a series of experiments, a logically reasoned argument, something that someone else published in the past, or some
other trustworthy source of information. This is when the writer actually tries to show they have found a possible answer to the original question. It also is when a
good writer will outline the potential limitations of their own argument, and lay out new questions to think about.
How should you begin to read a scientific paper?
Look at how its structured
How could someone new to the field read an article strategically if they want to Increase your background knowledge?
Focus on introduction
How could someone new to the field read an article strategically if they want to see examples of overall experimental designs related to their own questions
Focus on methods
How could someone new to the field read an article strategically if they want to find out which statistics tests are used to analyze a particular type of data?
Focus on the Statistics section, which tends to be the last part of the Methods.
How could someone new to the field read an article strategically if they want to see how particular types of data are summarized and displayed?
Focus on the graphs, tables, and figures in the Results
How could someone new to the field read an article strategically if they want to learn how data and evidence from studies by others has been interpreted?
Focus on the interpretations in the Discussion.
How could someone with experience in the field read an article strategically if they want to get a deep understanding of a particular
question that interests them?
Focus on how the story told by the Introduction is organized, &
what prior knowledge is emphasized.
How could someone with experience in the field read an article strategically if they want to find out where other professionals are
getting reagents or study organisms?
Focus on the list of sources, or where the authors say they got
materials.
How could someone with experience in the field read an article strategically if they want to identify & understand controversies or
unanswered questions?
Focus on differences in stories told in the Discussion section by
authors from different labs.
How could someone with experience in the field read an article strategically if they want to put their own study into a larger context?
Focus on the narrative in the Discussion. What do other authors
say is important? Why?
How could someone with experience in the field read an article strategically if they want to compare their results to what others have
reported?
Focus on the data tables and figures, particularly how the trends
they observed compare to published work by others
How could someone with experience in the field read an article strategically if they want to find additional articles that could be useful for interpreting their own work?
Focus on the full list of Literature Cited.
How could someone with experience in the field read an article strategically if they want to know what the influential labs, authors, and papers in the field are?
Focus on which papers and authors are listed in the Literature
Cited; which authors show up repeatedly.
Describe the range of disease severity in malaria
- Asymptomatic: no symptoms
- Clinical uncomplicated: fever, headache, vomiting, and diarrhea.
- Severe malaria: severe anemia, pulmonary or renal dysfunction,
neurologic changes.
Which type of malaria are most likely to progress to severe?
P. falciparum and P. knowlesi are the most likely to progress to
severe, fatal disease and deaths are often due to central nervous
system involvement (cerebral malaria), acute renal failure, severe
anemia, or acute respiratory distress syndrome
What types of malaria cause morbidity but are less likely to
cause deaths?
P. vivax
P. malariae
P. ovale