SOC388 - 7. Becker/Garfinkel Flashcards

(45 cards)

1
Q

Becker

A

pragmatism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Labeling Theory

A

used to think there’s an inherent disposition toward deviance
once we attach label, we treat them as a deviant and will act deviant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Meaning

A

learn to associate effects of smoking with pleasure of smoking
first we have to learn how to properly smoke it
learn to recognize the effects and connect it to drug use

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Meaning

A

nothing inherent in why people become marijuana user
meaning is created through our conversation of gestures in interaction
symbolic interactionism: people have to point to meaning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Experience

A

learn that playing sports is a pleasurable experience regardless of outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Experience

A

there’s physical reactions which lead to positive sensations

associate physical reactions with pleasurable experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Experience

A

there’s two ways of learning meanings: told by others and by observation
shopping: associate positive feeling with buying something new

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Experience

A

we have to identify them as positive, point to them for ourselves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Interaction

A

how we learn meanings of things and experiences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Garfinkel

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Ethnomethodology

A

“study of set of common sense knowledge and range of procedures and considerations whereby people makes sense of find their way about in and act in situations they are part of”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Ethnomethodology

A

1967 - new way of studying

reflexively – we don’t think about it – reflex

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Ethnomethodology

A

members shape action in relation to context while the context itself is constantly being redefined through action
social order ongoing (constantly maintaining) practical (actions) accomplishment (something we accomplish)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Ethnomethodology

A

criticism of traditional mainstream sociology – didn’t take everyday life seriously
we have to study everyday life as opposed to seeing social order as context to explain something else

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Ethnomethodology

A

traditional sociologists took everyday life for granted

Blumer and Garfinkel says we need to explain social order and everyday life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Ethnomethodology

A

We had to study people
Tries to explain common sense
Argued against micro and macro – distinction wrong and misleading

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Ethnomethodology

A

Can’t easily distinguish between macro and micro

Even macro structures are still that things we accomplish through ongoing practices

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Ethnomethodology

A

Blumer: distinction betw external and internal factors is misleading, both are maintained
Macro structures are not prior to our experience, they wouldn’t exist if we didn’t take actions to maintain them
Micro structures are the same way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Institutional Settings

A

How ppl perform tasks in institutions shape institutions themselves
Call centre is nothing without ppl who answer phone calls in a particular way

20
Q

Institutional Settings

A

Micro behaviours of people who work there that constitute the call centres
Don’t look at external forces such as rules, procedures, but what people do there

21
Q

Institutional Settings

A

Nature of interactions defines the interactions

22
Q

Conversation Analysis

A

Analysis of social interactions
Relationship between utterances
Detailed study of structures of conversational interactions

23
Q

Conversation Analysis

A

Look at each word and order of what people say
Conversation is the most important interaction
Introverts do more small talk so they don’t barge into conversation full force

24
Q

Conversation Analysis

A

Look at who begins, maintains, ends conversation
Laughter: result of structural characteristics that induce laughter
Applause: moment where activity increases to induce applause

25
Conversation Analysis
Booing increases more gradually | Underscores the orderly character of social interaction – whether it’s with a friend or at a stadium
26
Ethnomethods
Methods people use on daily basis to accomplish everyday life Reflexive understandings allow us to conduct everyday life
27
Ethnomethods
-
28
Common Sense
key concept for ethnomethodology not formal logic, but practical reasoning choose what makes sense to us based on experience
29
Common Sense
Common sense because we don’t think about it – they’re so obvious So internalized and taken for granted
30
Common Sense
Assume that everyone agrees with this Cultural rules we use to make sense of the world Expectations about everything
31
Reality – 5 Key Features
Mehan & Wood 1. Reflexive: unquestioned beliefs about anything – things that cannot be proven wrong self-sealing beliefs
32
Reality – 5 Key Features
justify discrepancies with our beliefs – explaining failed prediction of the end of the world
33
Reality – 5 Key Features
2. Reality is coherent | order, logic, structure to reality in order to predict it
34
Reality – 5 Key Features
3. Interactional | reality is created, maintained and changed through interaction with other people
35
Reality – 5 Key Features
4. Fragile subject to performance breakdowns work hard to not disrupt realities Goffman
36
Reality – 5 Key Features
5. Permeable | constantly moving between realities and each reality has its own context and its own common sense rules
37
Phenomenology
certain way of understanding how we live everyday life and how we study that
38
Accounts
acceptable given particular realities | when we explain and justify what we did
39
Accounts
some are unacceptable in other contexts – having a cold is fine for missing a test, but not for missing a wedding
40
Accounts
-
41
Breaching Experiments
disrupt social order – look at reaction to see what ppl do to maintain social order create physical distance by not acknowedging other’s presence
42
Breaching Experiments
we take common sense meanings for granted how are you? What do you mean? Physically, emotionally? Best way to explain common sense
43
Trust
Trust that other people will respond in way that we expect them to respond Script people tend to follow in particular interaction
44
Trust
We can be reflexive because we trust people will follow script Lost of trust in breaching experiments
45
Trust
-