social Flashcards

(44 cards)

1
Q

Hare Kris Society

A

reciprocity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

door in the face

A

large request, then small request, reciprocity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

nudges

A

no restriction, school canteen, enhance compliance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

jonestown

A

cult, social proof and uncertainty, enhancing compliance, people’s temple

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

petrified forest national park

A

social proof uncertainty, enhacing compliance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

scarcity

A

ehance compliance, special offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

elaboration likelihood model

A

central route, peripheral route

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

foot in the door

A

consistency, enhancing compliance, small request, then large reuqest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

low ball techique

A

hidden cost after agreement, consistency, enhance compliance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

cognitive consistency

A

try to maintain internal consistency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

balance theory, who and what

A

Heider, we like people who think like is, odd number of positive relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Newcomb studies

A

male student in student housing, balance theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Anson and Cope

A

Harsh experiment, ppl like nasty surperior, both hate their enemy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Implicit Association test, what

A

prove prejudical reaction might be automatic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

LaPiere studies

A

Chinese couple

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Wicker & Mischel

A

found: weak connection between attitude and behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

how? improve a/b relationship

A
  1. less social influence
  2. be specific
    increase a/ strength
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Leon Festinger

A

cognitive dissonance theory

19
Q

Cognitive dissonance theory

A

rationalism, discomfort of inconsistancy action, cognitive consistency based

20
Q

Leon Festinger & Carlsmith

A

insufficient justication & dissonance

participant lie about it being fun for $1 instead of $20

21
Q

Ben Franklin

A

borrow his enemies books, lower dissonace

ppl will like the ppl who ask for a favour

insufficant justification

22
Q

Jecker & Landy

A

participant who donate money like the experi more

23
Q

Aronson & Mills

A

female doing none/mild/secere sexual stuff

the harder it is, the more they found it interesting

24
Q

Zimardo

A

grasshopper, mean and nice police, eat more for mean police

25
Painting studies (insufficent justification)
Amnesics & dissonance love the one we picked more hate the others we didn't pick more
26
cognitive dissonance require conscious awareness?
no
27
Egan studies
Capchin Monkeys and M&M's, dislike the blue colour even more (didn;t pick initially)
28
Hovland (Yale)
Message learning persuadtion
29
Message learning persuation
ACA new incentives > old incentives
30
Consideration
agreeing to request without a thought eg. photocopy queue
31
Sherif
Norm formation Autokinetic illusion (spot light moved) (3 people)
32
Autokinetic illusion
3 ppl estimate how much spot light moved beginning: alone then: group Sherif
33
Asch's conformity studies
one participant , all are confederates no punish/reward
34
factors that change the Asch studies
1. Group size 2.one dissenter 3.ppl experienced in non-conformity 4.anonymity (doing experi alone)
35
Milgram
Milgram's obedience studies
36
Milgram obedience studies variation what
cruel first study teacher and student variation: v1. victim's distance 2.closeness and legitimacy 3.Institutional authority 4. someone else shock the student
37
Burger
Burger obedience studies
38
Burger obedience studies what differences
same as Milgram's studies differences: 1.stop at 150 volts 2. give rewards nonetheless subject tried to disobey, but ineffective The empathy test
39
The empathy test
in Burger's studies Tried to disobey but ineffective confusion & uncertainty increase conformity release from responsibility incremental involvement( foot in the door) increase volt step by step
40
attractiveness of talker high and low credibility of talker (fast or slow talker)
source variable
41
repetition fear (U-shape) mere exposure
message variables
42
self esteem of people mood
Audience variables
43
mere exposure
higher familiarity, like more, more persuaded but burnout: repeat but add variation in ads (e,g stories)
44
Zajonc
Mere exposure