Social Flashcards

(29 cards)

1
Q

Agency theory supported by:

A

Milgram

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Social impact theory supported by:

A
  • Milgram v7 immediacy
  • Milgram v10 & 13 strength
  • Berkowitz & Brown - number: look up at building
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Social Identity theory supporting:

A
  • Jane Elliot (blue eyes)
  • Sherif
  • Tajfel - boys choose maximum difference over maximum joint profit
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Tajfel

A

Boys choose maximum difference over maximum joint profit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

RCT supporing

A

Sherif
Ember (intergroup violence in famines)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Individual factors effecting prejudice supporting

A
  • Cohrs
  • Lippa & Arad (AP & attitudes towards homosexuality)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Situational factors affecting prejudice supporting

A

Sechrist & Sangor (social norms impact where you sit)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Cultural factors affecting prejudice supporting

A
  • Smith & Bond (collective more prej)
  • Guidmond (anti-muslim lower when pro-diversity policy)
  • Al-Zahrani (Saudi Arabi = collectivist & more prej vs USA)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Gender affecting obedience supporting

A
  • Sheridan & king (100% women shock puppies vs 54% men)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How many women vs men shocked puppies in Sheridan & King?

A

100% vs 54%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Gender factors in obedience conflicting

A
  • Burger (found no diff in willingness to shock)
  • Kilham & Mann (women less obedient, 16% vs 40%)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Obedience levels in Kilham & Mann

A

Women = 16%
Men = 40%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Individual factors in obedience conflicting

A
  • Burger (empathy had no effect)
  • Milgram (48% put blame on self vs 39% on experimenter, internal LOC)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What percentage put blame on self in Milgram

A

48% self 39% experimenter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Supporting situational factors affecting obedience

A
  • Milgram 15v increments = momentum of compliance
  • Milgram v7 = proximity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Cultural factors in obedience supporting

A
  • smith & bond found collective more obedient
17
Q

Cultural factors in obedience conflicting

A

Blass found little difference between collectivist & individual

18
Q

Social impact theory conflicted by

A
  • Mullen - strength & immediacy not consistently supported
19
Q

SIT divisional effect & psychosocial law

A

Divisional = strength is divided my number of targets
Psychosocial = as number increases, so does strength but at a decreasing rate

20
Q

Stages in SIT

A
  • social categorisation
  • social identification
  • social comparison
21
Q

Individual factors: prejudice

22
Q

Situational factors: prejudice

A
  • soc norms
  • pre exist groups
  • competition
23
Q

Culture factors: prejudice

A
  • Individualist vs collectivist
  • assimilative vs multicultural
24
Q

Individual factors: obedience

A
  • AP
  • LoC
  • Empathy
25
Situational factors: obedience
- momentum of compliance - presence/responsibility of authority figure - barriers (is smth between you and “victim” or you and authority) - proximity
26
Sherif sample & age
22 11-12 y/os
27
Sherif results
Out group friendships rattlers: 6.3% -> 36.3%
28
Phases in sherif
- in group formation - friction - intergration
29
How did we analyse social practical
- Mean - SD - Thematic analysis