Social context of schooling inc. bullying, theory of mind, empathy, SES Flashcards

(48 cards)

1
Q

Social Psychology

A

The cognition, emotion and behaviour of individuals.
Focusing on this in social situations.
Different social contexts generate different responses.
Social context can be ‘actual, imagined, or implied’.
Investigated within developmental psychology and evolutionary psychology, also relevant to organisational psychology.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Theory of Mind

A

It means understanding others’ beliefs/desires/intentions.
It’s used to understand others’ behaviour, or to predict how they might feel/behave.
It is therefore fundamental to social interaction.
The most common test for this is the ‘false belief’ test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

False-belief

A

First major areas to look at for Theory of Mind
False-belief understanding is known to relate to children’s ability to:
Participate in meaningful conversations
Resolve conflicts
Maintain personal friendships
And so it is important for overall social competence; and may inhibit the social functioning of students with developmental delays

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Promoting Theory of Mind

A

Talk about thoughts, wants and feelings – teach the vocabulary, look at expressions, discuss past experiences, think about story characters
Explain reasons when intervening in social conflict
Provide social interaction – children with siblings benefit from this
Encourage pretend play

ToM also depends on progress in various developmental domains,
e.g. language development, working memory, and executive function.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Spotlight Effect - theory of mind

A

Adolescents thinks they are in the ‘spotlight’ and everyone can just see what they are thinking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Empathy

A

Feeling responses to others’ experiences
Empathy relates to our cognitive and affective responses to others’ experiences.
It involves imagining oneself in another’s position
This increases pro-social behaviour – helping others and showing compassion.
Similar to sympathy, but sympathy does not require the same degree of experiencing/sharing the feeling.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Bystander effect

A

Not standing up for someone being bullied or not taking personal responsibility.
More people around us, less likely we are to get involved.
(When empathy fails) When people are in groups, and observe a critical situation (e.g. someone needing help), they seem to experience:
less empathy
less sense of responsibility
less impetus to intervene
This is known as the bystander effect, or diffusion of responsibility.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Bullying - defintion

A

Bullying involves an ongoing, negative relationship with clear imbalance of power: there’s a bully and a victim.

  • Power imbalance
  • Repetition
  • Intent to harm
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Cyberbullying - definition

A

Bullying that takes place through information and communication technologies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Direct bullying

occurs between the people involved

A

Physical
Verbal
Harrassment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Indirect bullying

involves others

A

Social
Denigration (unfairly criticising someone)
Outing (revealing someones sexuality)
Impersonation (pretending to be someone else/fraud)
Exclusion (denying access)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Outcomes of bullying

A

Low psychological well-being - low self-esteem, anger, sadness
Poor social adjustment - loneliness, dislike of school, absenteeism
Psychological distress - anxiety, depression, suicidal thoughts
Physical unwellness - diagnosed illness, self-harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Causes of bullying

A
Have low self-esteem
Lack attention at school/home
Experience neglect
View bullying role models
Poor social/emotional skills
Bullying is learned behaviour which can be unlearned
*may be bullied themselves
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Online disinhibition

A

When people are more likely to say something online than they are in ‘real life’.
People seem to exert less control over their behaviour during virtual interactions than in real life.
This can be positive – sharing feelings, showing generosity etc. This is benign disinhibition.
OR it can result in rudeness, harsh criticism, abusive comments, and threats of violence: toxic disinhibition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Factors related to online disinhibition

A

Dissociative anonymity - People can hide or change their identity online
Invisibility - Doesn’t matter how you look or sound, no eye-contact
Asynchronicity - May not see people’s reactions
Solipsistic introjection - Imagination of characters/voices in your mind
Dissociative imagination - Created personas are not part of the real world
Minimisation of status and authority - Everyone is equal, nobody in charge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Social Identity Theory

A

3 stages of evaluation in determining ‘us’ and ‘them’
Social Categorisation - race, gender, age, occupation, etc.
Social Identification - adopting the identity of the chosen group
Social Comparison - favourably comparing our group to others
These processes & the outcomes relate to self-concept & self-esteem.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

School strategies - bullying

A

see picture file ‘bullying school strategies’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Restoring relationships

A

Disciplinary approach - punishments or sanctions, may also serve as deterrent
Strengthening the ‘target’ - reduce power disparity, support self-esteem, offer strategies
Mediation - to problem-solve the underlying conflict
Support group method - for the offender to reflect upon their behaviour
Restorative practices - expression of remorse, attempt to help
Method of Shared Concern - identify concern, plan to help, meet with target to resolve

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Prevention is best

A
Whole -school approach
Leadership
Inclusion
Student Voice
Partnerships (community)
Support
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

How does SES affect achievement?

A
Trauma/Resources/Stress:
Poor health care
Low expectations
Less developed language
Inadequate opportunities for early learning
Learned  helplessness, low self-esteem
Peer influence, resistance cultures
Home environment & resources
Child-rearing styles
Streaming in schools 
Early poverty yields worst results
21
Q

SES Impacts

A
Cognitive development
Emotional development
Social skills
Behavioural issues
Self-concept, self-esteem, self-efficacy
22
Q

Resilience - factors

A

Personal characteristics – e.g., belief in personal control, optimism, adaptive coping strategies
Family characteristics – cohesion, shared values, valuing education, supportive adults
Availability of external support systems – provide access to more resources, help with chronic stress, etc.

23
Q

How students respond to challenging circumstances

A

Individual differences are important in how students respond to challenging circumstances. We want to promote adaptive dispositions for all students:

Positive self-concept
Self-esteem & self-efficacy
Sense of belonging
Growth mindset
Mastery goal orientation
Deep approach to learning
24
Q

Seven Principles of Good Feedback

A

1 - Provides opportunities to close the gap between current & desired performance
2 - Helps clarify what good performance is (goals, criteria, or expected standards).
3 - Delivers high quality information to students about their learning
4 - Facilitates the development of self-assessment (reflection) in learning
5 - Encourages teacher and peer dialogue around learning
6 - Encourages positive motivational beliefs and healthy self-esteem.
7 - Provides information to teachers that can be used to help shape their teaching

25
Recursive Curriculum
Background knowledge, start with what students know, then move forward. Students can’t move forward if they haven’t consolidated prior learning.
26
Assessment
The purposeful gathering and analysis of information about student learning
27
Formative Assessment
information gathered while students are still learning (informs about their progress). may be informal (marks not recorded) or formal (marks recorded). Constant; occurs throughout the learning process. students take responsibility for their own learning. Using self- and peer assessment to help students to become more conscious of their own thinking and learning processes.
28
Summative Assessment
information gathered about students’ achievement at a particular time. relates to accountability, and the summation of students’ learning at the end of the year. It has the goal of judging what students know and can do (at a particular point in time). Some examples: topic tests, half- or yearly-exams, HSC exams
29
Evaluation
The process of making judgements about the quality of something
30
Quantitative (measurable) evaluation
Tell and/or show me what you have learned. Some examples: questionnaires, revision questions, Kahoot, quizzes and so on
31
Qualitative Evaluation
Show me how you can apply, synthesise, evaluate, and/or design what you’ve learned. Some examples: essays, presentations, portfolios, role play, debates, case studies, problem solving, etc.
32
Reasons for Assessments - Teachers
find out what students know and can do learn about students’ strengths & weaknesses (areas to improve) evaluate their teaching evaluate students’ learning plan future learning and teaching sessions report to others about students’ learning and performance identify students who need special assistance with learning and the type of help they need.
33
Reasons for Assessments - Students
provide feedback on their performance help them to set learning goals motivate them provide information on how to improve
34
Reasons for Assessments - Schools
provide information about a group of students help them to evaluate their programs give information to parents about their child’s progress, relative to others. identify students’ progress relative to a particular benchmark help identify schools and students in need of additional support
35
Reasons for asking students QUESTIONS
get them thinking motivate learners improve lesson effectiveness foster rapport between you and your students enhance learning through communication among learners assess prior knowledge assess learning assess teaching effectiveness guide those having difficulties back to the task encourage personal connections to the content
36
Assessment Planning - Timing
Assessment is planned early along with the development of the unit/course. It needs to be embedded in the initial design
37
Quality Control - Reliability
the extent to which a test of measurement device obtains the same result when used on successive occasions. It’s dependable. Therefore, if two different people mark the same test independently of each other, they will give the same marks
38
Quality Control - Validity
“truth” in measurement, i.e., the extent to which a test measures what it purports to measure. Therefore, it should be easy to link it to the outcomes explicitly as well as content taught in lessons.
39
Assessment type - Norm-reference
Students’ scores on a test are compared with the average score gained on the test by students of similar age and learning background. The mean (average score) provides a standard of performance (norm) against which the scores of others can be compared. Norms can be based on scores from a class, a school, or a wider area, results may be scaled e.g. the HSC, Naplan, PISA. Results can be graphed as a bell or normal curve and standard deviation is also noted.
40
Assessment type - Criterion-referenced
Achievement is compared against a specified criterion or standard, i.e., how well a student has mastered a particular skill Students are working towards the achievement of outcomes that are located sequentially along a learning progression. Standards remain constant over time and place
41
Assessment type - Ipsative assessment
This form of assessment is individualised. It compares an individual’s current achievement with previous achievement(s). Personal best is one of the terms.
42
Pygmalion Effect
High expectations – implicitly or explicitly given.
43
Golem Effect
Low expectations – implicitly or explicitly given
44
Authentic Assessment
Assessment tasks are designed to help students participate actively in real-life tasks and problem-solving situations, similar or the same as the skills they will need throughout their lives. Students need to use their prior and current knowledge, relevant skills in order to complete their complex real-world projects Students are informed of the task beforehand then have time to prepare for it, including mastering the necessary competencies required to complete the task. Examples can include: debates, simulations, presentations, & demonstrations.
45
Effective Authentic Assessment
Focus on essential content Focus on concepts rather than specialised skills Are in-depth Lead students to other challenges and questions Are capable of producing a quality product or service instead of just one correct answer Focus on what students know and further the growth of student knowledge base and skills Are comprised of criteria that students understand and agree upon before the project begins Allow students to demonstrate competency in multiple ways Are designed to allow many points of view and analyses Are scored based on the essence of the task rather than correct answers
46
SOLO
Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome WORKS FOR ALL AGE LEVELS ACROSS ALL KLA'S
47
SOLO Principles
It is based on two principles: Intellectual development proceeds through a process of distinct leaps of quality in the way in which learning is typically engaged and in which desired outcomes may be typically described; - AS WE GET OLDER WHAT WE LEARN BECOMES MORE COMPLEX & WE HAVE HIGHER EXPECTATIONS IN OUTCOMES Learning outcomes, within any specific phase of education, may be described in terms of its underlying structural complexity. - WORK GETS HARDER THROUGHOUT THE YEAR/COURSE ETC This allows us to assess the quality of student learning within and across domains using a common metric (measuring device) whilst at the same time establishing benchmarks of change as a result of the exposure to the educational process.
48
SOLO Framework
SOLO is based on descriptions of structural complexity at five levels: PRE-STRUCTURAL - The task itself is not attacked in an appropriate way such as saying same thing twice in different ways, or just repeating the question. The student hasn’t understood the point. UNI-STRUCTURAL - One relevant aspect of the task is picked up and there is no relationship between facts or ideas. Understanding is nominal. Uses single relevant piece or aspect of the information; makes generalisations on the basis of this aspect; may display premature closure because all available data have not been used. MULTI-STRUCTURAL - Several (two or more) independent aspects are picked up or understood serially, but are not interrelated. Uses several pieces of information but does not relate them to each other; makes generalisations based on few aspects independently of each other; shows a feel for consistency, but can reach inconsistent answers by focusing on different aspects of the data. RELATIONAL - Relevant aspects are integrated into an overall coherent structure. Considers data as a whole with consistent structure and meaning; uses and interrelates all available information; induces general conclusions from the data by generalisation within the context of the available data only. EXTENDED ABSTRACT - Uses and interrelates all information and tests it against appropriate abstract concepts suggested by the data; uses deductive logic to relate specific data to general rules; generalises about hypothetical situations; can recognise alternative approaches and use combinatorial reasoning resulting in a preparedness to leave conclusions open; can extend structures under consideration to take in new and more abstract features