Social- Emotional Development: 2. Attachment Flashcards

1
Q

What is attachment?

A

“a close emotional relationship between two persons, characterised by mutual affection and a desire to maintain proximity (closeness).” (Eysenck)

“an emotional bond with a specific person that is enduring across space and time. Usually, attachments are discussed in regard to the relation between infants and specific caregivers, although they can also occur in adulthood” (Siegler)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is attachment in terms of child development?

A

The affectional ties or emotional bonds that children form with their primary caregivers.

This includes:
a desire for proximity
a sense of security
feelings of distress when the person is absent
ties endure beyond infancy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Research questions regarding attachment

A

What aspects of early interaction are important for establishing bonds between infant and parent?

How important is the quality of early interaction between infant and parent for later development?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What bonds a caregiver and infant?

Harlow

A

primary needs or intimate contact?

Harlow’s work with infant rhesus monkeys
Experiments:
IV = aspect of mother available to infant
DV = amount of time with ‘mother’, feeding time, returning when threatened.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Effects on later development (Harlow)

A

Behaviour as adolescents. Aggressive interaction – no normal play.

Behaviour as adults. Isolated monkeys abnormal sexual behaviour

Length of time of deprivation experience. Up to 3 months, no problem; 6 months or more dramatic disturbances

Importance of interaction with other members of the species - nurturing adults, peers.

Do these findings generalise to human infants?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Bowlby- attachment theory

A

Ethology: Imprinting – Konrad Lorenz

Close contact with adult essential for development.

Attachment behaviour is pre-wired in humans to keep immature infants close to their parents.

Traits and behaviours part of an evolutionary, adaptive system.

Review of findings of studies of institutionalised children for World Health Organisation.

Concept of Maternal Deprivation with emphasis on role of biological mother.

Breaking the maternal bond with the child during the early years of life is likely to have serious effects on intellectual, social and emotional development.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Bowlby- attachment theory stages

A

Infant responds in similar way to everyone.
Approx. 5 months: discriminates among people – preference for primary caregiver.
Around 7 months stays close to primary caregiver; ‘separation protest’.
3 years + : goal corrected partnership – shows some sensitivity to caregiver’s needs.
5 years internal working model of child – caregiver relationship.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Ainsworth- The Strange Situation

A

Research strategy for investigating attachment behaviour.

Attachment behaviour observed in company of parent, and in separation and reunion episodes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Patterns of attachment behaviour

A

Main, Kapan and Cassidy (1985) identified a fourth type of attachment behaviour.

Classifications:
Anxious-avoidant
Secure attachment
Anxious-resistant
Disorganised – disoriented
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Fraley and Spieker (2003) opposition to conventional classification of attachment behaviour

A

Fraley and Spieker (2003) argued that it is an oversimplification to assign children’s attachment patterns to three (or four) categories.

e.g., Two children might both be classified as showing avoidant attachment, but one may display more avoidant behaviour.

Dimensions of :
Avoidance/withdrawal vs proximity seeking
Angry and resistant vs emotional confidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Parenting factors and attachment

A

Key parent behaviour:
Sensitive responsiveness on part of carer
Responsive to signals of infant

Key feature of interaction - a secure base to explore the world.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How early attachment influences later behaviour

A

children develop an internal working model of relationships.

Early experience persists in the expectations the child has about responses from carers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Evidence for the internal working model

A

Habituation paradigm:
Infant behaviour is pre-verbal
Event repeated until it becomes ‘expected’
New event – looking time recorded

Prediction:
Expected → shorter looking time
Unexpected → longer looking time

Test trials observed parent:
return to distressed child OR
observed parent continue to move away.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Research findings for the internal working model

A

Children previously identified as securely attached to their caregiver looked longer (were more surprised) when the parent continued moving away from the distressed child than when the parent returned to the child.

In contrast, children previously identified as insecurely attached showed little discrimination between the two events.

Internal working model of relationships – expectations about the behaviour of the other.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Cross cultural factors and attachment

A

Sagi, Ijzendoorn & Koren-Karie (1991) used the Strange Situation methodology to test attachment in infants in US, Israel, Japan and Germany.

A cross-national comparison of data from seven laboratories ( N = 498) was carried out in order to determine (a) whether the pre-separation episodes made any difference in attachment classifications and (b) whether infant behaviour in different countries was indeed the same before separation from the mother.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Posada, Jacobs, Richmond, Carbonell, Alzate, Bustamante & Quiceno, 2002).

Cultural comparison of Denver, Colorado and Bogata

A

Does the sensitivity–security hypothesis extend to cultures different from those of industrialized Western countries?

Participants - 60 U.S. (Denver, Colorado) and 61 Colombian (Bogota) mother–infant dyads from a middle-class background

Measures

(1) Maternal care-giving behaviour;
(2) Infant’s attachment behaviour;

17
Q

Denver and Bogata comparison results

A

Denver: Maternal sensitivity
Secure attachment M = .69, SD= .19
Insecure attachment M = .53, SD= .24
Correlation r= .33 (p<.05)

Marea you need to add to these results look back at the paper pages 71-72

18
Q

Items for mother behaviour domains (Denver and Bogata comparison)

A

Sensitive responsiveness: “Unaware or insensitive to baby’s signals.”

Accessibility: “Seems to be aware of baby even when not in same room”

Acceptance: “Is irritated by demands of baby” “Is delighted over baby”

19
Q

Results of comparison between Denver and Bogata in terms of sensitive responsiveness, accessibility and acceptance

A

Sensitive responsiveness:
Denver r =.30*
Bogota r =.50**

Accessibility:
Denver r =.27*
Bogota r =.47**

Acceptance:
Denver r =.24
Bogota r =.40**

20
Q

Problems with cross cultural examination (Denver and Bogata)

A

It is important not to exaggerate cultural differences in attachment.

Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) showed that the variation in attachment style within cultures was 1.5 times greater than the variation between cultures.