social influence Flashcards
(40 cards)
types of conformity
compliance, internalisation, and identification
compliance
a person may agree in public with a group of people, but the person privately disagrees with the group’s viewpoint or behaviour
internalisation
publicly changing behaviour to fit in with the group while also agreeing with them privately
identification
when someone conforms to the demands of a given social role in society e.g. a policeman
explanations for conformity
normative and informational social influence
normative social influence
where a person conforms to fit in with the group because they don’t want to appear foolish or be left out (usually associated with compliance)
study on normative influence
asch
informational social influence
where a person conforms because they have a desire to be right, and look to others who they believe may have more information (unsure of a situation or lacks knowledge)
study on informational influence
jenness’ bean jar experiment
variables affecting conformity
asch’s line study
asch procedure
-5-7 participants per group
-each group presented with standard line and three comparison lines
-participants had to say aloud which comparison line matched
-in each group there was only one real participant the remaining 6 were confederates
-the confederates were told to give the incorrect answer on 12 out of 18 trials
asch results
real participants conformed on 32% of the critical trials where confederates gave the wrong answers, additionally, 75% of the sample conformed to the majority on at least one trial
asch evaluation
-lacks ecological validity (based on perception of lines)
-sampling issues (only carried out on men)
-gender bias
-population validity
-ethical issues (couldn’t give informed consent)
factors affecting conformity
group size, group unanimity, difficulty of task, answer in private
group size
the bigger the majority group, the more people conformed up to a certain point
group unanimity
a person is more likely to conform when all the members of the group agree and give the same answer
difficulty of task
the more difficult the task, the greater the conformity
answer in private
when participants are allowed to answer in private conformity decreases (fewer group pressures)
conformity to social roles
stanford prison experiment
stanford prison experiment
zimbardo wanted to investigate how readily people would conform to the social roles of guard and prisoner
prison experiment procedure
-zimbardo advertised for students to play the roles of prisoners and guards for a fortnight
participants were randomly assigned to roles
-prisoners were issued a uniform and referred to by their number only
-guards were given uniforms and props (dark glasses to make eye contact with prisoners impssible)
-no psychical violence was permitted
-zimbardo observed the behaviour and also acted as prison warden
prison experiment findings
-within hours of beginning, guards began harassing prisoners
-prisoners ‘told tales’ on each other to the guards
-as the prisoners became more submissive the guards became more aggressive and assertive
prison experiment evaluation
-demand characteristics could explain the findings (most of the guards claimed they were simply acting)
-findings cannot be generalised to real life (low ecological validity)
-lacks population validity as the sample compromised US male students
-lack of fully informed consent
-prisoners were not protected from psychological harm
-harmful treatment of participants led to the formal recognition of ethical guidelines
obedience
a type of social influence where a person follows an order from another person who is usually an authority figure