SOCIAL INFLUENCE Flashcards

(27 cards)

1
Q

Conformity.

A
  • Favouring majority/ socially acceptable decision.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Types of conformity.

A
  • Internalisation.
  • Compliance.
  • Identification.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Internalisation.

A
  • Individually agrees/ accepts views of group.
  • Pubic + private change.
  • Permanent- persists in absence of group.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Identification.

A
  • Mid-level.
  • Values group- identifies and wants to be apart.
  • Changes thoughts and behaviour to fit in.
  • Doesn’t agree personally.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Compliance.

A
  • Going along with others in public.
  • Superficial/ shallow change.
  • Changes behaviour + opinion away from group pressure.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Explanations for conformity.

A
  • Deutsch + Gerad - 2 Process model.
  • Normative + Informational.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Normative social influence.

A
  • Emotional rather than cognitive.
  • To be accepted by majority.
  • To gain approval.
  • To avoid rejection + ridicule.
  • Leads to compliance (temporary).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Informational social influence.

A
  • Cognitive rather than emotional.
  • Rely on majority to be correct.
  • Desire to be correct.
  • Occurs in ambiguous, difficult and novel situations.
  • Leads to internalisation (permanent).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Asch.

A

AIM- If naïve pp would conform to confederates.
PROCEDURE-
- 123 male American undergraduates.
- Lab experiment.
- Stated which of 3 lines matched length of standard.
- 12/18 were incorrect, critical trials.
FINDINGS-
- 37% conformity rate.
- Control trial= 1% mistake.
- Most conformed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Asch variations.

A

1- GROUP SIZE.
- Changed from 1-15 people.
- Conformity increased from 1-3 (up to 31.8%) then plateaued at 37-40%.
2- UNANIMITY.
- One confederate gave correct answer.
- Conformity decreased to 5%.
3- TASK DIFFICULTY.
- Made difference smaller.
- Conformity increased.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Zimbardo.

A

A - Conformity to social roles
P - Stanford university psychology department basement.
- 24 Male university students.
- Psychologically healthy.
- Zimbardo = Superintendent.
- Prisoner or guard role.
- Prisoner = arrested at home, strip searched, given uniform.
- Guard = uniform + worked shifts.
F - Guards became aggressive.
- Prisoners rebelled.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Zimbardo evaluation.

A

+ PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS. - For example, Zimbardo’s research has been used within prison training regimes to highlight and warn Guards about the nature of conformity to roles. This is important as it will hopefully prevent aggressive behaviour that can happen within groups of prison staff towards inmates.
- DEMAND CHARACTERISTICS. - For example, some psychologists argue that the participants were not genuinely conforming to a role but merely responding to the demand characteristics (play acting) of the set-up situation that they were in. It was made more unrealistic by the fact that Zimbardo was also playing a character in the study (the superintendent).
- ETHICAL ISSUES. - For example, Zimbardo caused psychological distress to many of his participants, so much so that the study had to be stopped after 5 days rather than lasting two weeks. It is argued that Zimbardo’s role as the ‘superintendent’ clouded his judgement with regards the protection of his participants and their right to withdraw.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

MILGRAM.

A
  • Yale University.
  • 40 Male american participants.
  • Learner= confederate behind wall.
  • Teacher= participant.
  • Experimenter.
  • 65% = 450v.
  • 100% = 300v.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

MILGRAM SITUATIONAL VARIABLES.

A
  1. Proximity =
    - T + L closer = decreases o (30%).
    - T + A further = decreases o (21%)
  2. Location =
    - Less credible location/ rundown building in Bridgeport = decreases o (47.5%).
  3. Uniform =
    - Less authority = decreases o (20%).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

MILGRAM EVALUATION.

A

+ RS -Bickman - uniform variation.
+ Controlled lab study.
+ Practical applications.
- Ethics.
- Androcentric sample.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

EXPLANATIONS OF O.

A
  1. Agentic state.
  2. Legitimacy of authority.
  3. Authoritarian personality.
17
Q

BICKMAN.

A

A = Investigate degree of social power the uniform has on others.
P =
- Brooklyn new York.
- 153 pedestrians (18 to 61 yrs).
- 4 male experimenters (18-20 yrs).
- Guard’s uniform, civilian clothes or milkman uniform.
- 3 situations = Dime and meter, Picking up a paper bag or bus stop.
- Guard = more obedience.

18
Q

Resistance to social influence.

A
  1. Locus of control.
  2. Social support.
19
Q

LOCUS OF CONTROL.

A
  • How much control a person feels they have on their own life.
  • Dispositional.
  • Measured with questions.
  • Rotter.
    1. Internal =
  • Ability to control own life.
  • Ability to make own decisions.
  • Success/ failure = due to themselves,
  • More confident + motivated.
  • Middle aged.
  • More likely to resist social influence.
    2. External =
  • Little/ no control over own life.
  • Others in control = must obey.
  • Passive + except fate.
  • Younger + elderly.
  • Less likely to resist social influence.
20
Q

SOCIAL SUPPORT.

A
  • Situational.
  • Resisting depends on others.
  • Ally = When someone else resists = more likely to also resist.
  • More likely to resist social influence.
21
Q

LOCUS OF CONTROL.

A

+ RS - Holland - Repeated Milgram’s baseline study + measured whether pp are internal and external, 37% of internals didn’t go to highest shock, 23% of externals didn’t, Int more likely to resist SI.
- RR - Twenge - analysed data from American obedience studies over a 40 yr period, data showed resistance and external has increased. Suggests external more likely to resist not internal.
- Determinist.
- Alt explanation.

22
Q

AGENTIC STATE.

A
  • Situational.
  • Social-psychological explanation.
  • psychological state.
  • No responsibility for obeying.
  • Acting for/in place of another.
  • Can feel guilt. But powerless to disobey.
  • Opposite of autonomous state.
    AGENTIC SHIFT.
  • Transition from autonomous to AGENTIC.
  • When someone perceives someone else as an authority figure.
    AUTONOMOUS STATE.
  • Free will, free to behave.
  • Sense of responsibility.
23
Q

LEGITIMACY OF AUTHORITY.

A
  • Society is hierarchical.
  • Authority figures have social power.
  • People accept that authority figures have social power and the power to punish.
  • Learn authority from a young age.
24
Q

LEGITIMACY OF AUTHORITY A03.

A

+ RS - Bickman. - Investigated degree of social power the uniform has on others. - Field experiment in Brooklyn, New York, Opportunity sample, Milkman, civilian and guard (white males 18-20), Pick up a bag, dime and meter, bus stop. civilian least power, guard most power.
+ PA - Schools and prisons.
- RS bias - America, white males 18-20.
- Doesn’t explain individual differences.

25
AUTHORITARIAN PERSONALITY.
- Adorno. - Authoritarian personality more likely to obey. - A result of harsh parenting. - Measured on the F scale. - High score = authoritarian personality. - Correlation between authoritarianism and prejudice.
26
AUTHORITARIAN PERSONALITY A03.
+ RS - Milgram and Elms. - Found fully obedient electro-shock participants scored highly on F-scale. - RS - Correlational not causation. - Theory based on unreliable and limited research. - Adorno conducted self report measures = social desirability bias, Adorno =possible interviewer bias.
27
SOCIAL SUPPORT A03.
+ RS - MILGRAM. - Added a confederate to electro-shock, From 65% to 10% of pp went to 450v.- SS increases resistance to si. - RS ISSUES. - MILGRAM. - Androcentric and ecological validity.