Social Influence Flashcards

(63 cards)

1
Q

Definition

Conformity

A

An individuals change in behaviour or belief as a result of real or imagined pressure (from a group)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the three types of conformity?

From shallowest to deepest

A

Compliance, Identification, Internalisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Definition

Compliance

NSI or ISI?

A

The shallowest form of conformity. An individual changes their behaviour to avoid rejection.

They only agree publicly, not permanant - NSI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Definition

Identification

A

Moderate level of conformity. Individual adopts behaviours or beliefs of a group for association with them. There is no internal agreement/ genuine belief.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Definition

Internalisation

NSI or ISI

A

The deepest form of conformity. Individual accepts behaviours and beliefs of the group privately and publicly.

It is a permanent form, even when the group is not present - ISI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Definition

NSI

A

Normative Social Influence - conforming to a majority to avoid rejection/ for a desire to be liked.

It is emotionally driven

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Definition

ISI

A

Information Social Influence - conforming to a majority because of a desire to be correct especially when right action is ambiguous.

Congnitively driven - others have more knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Asch - Procedure

A

123 american undergraduates
7 confederates and 1 naive ppt (seated near the end)
Ppts were shown a line and 3 comparisons
They were asked to publicly identify which line matched
6 control trials (correct answer given) and 12 critical trials (incorrect answer given)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Asch - Findings

A

75% of all ppts conformed at least once
5% conformed every time
Overall conformity rate = 32%
Supports NSI explanation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Asch Variables - Procedure

A

Group size: Same set up with 1-16 confederates
Unanimity: 1 confederate responded correctly
Task difficulty: Smaller differences between the comparison lines and actual line

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Asch Variables - Findings

A

Group size: more confederates led to greater conformity
Unanimity: conformity dropped to 5.5%
Task difficulty: conformity increased significantly

Unanimity = social support
Task difficulty = ISI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

AO3 Asch - Validity

A

^ High Internal Validity: can be easily replicated due to controlled variables
x Perrin and Spencer: Lack of temporal validity - study outdated (70yrs) based on conformist cold war Americans.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

AO3 Asch - Cultural bias

A

x Only used american undergraduate males = not generalisable
Bond: carried out a meta-analysis and found it varied depending on whether the country had a individualistic or collectivist society.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

AO3 Asch - Mundane Realism

A

x The task lack mundane realism, as it is very unlikely to occur in everyday life/ outside of the study - the task is artificial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Asch AO3 - Dispositional factors

A

nAfilliators - people who are more concerned with social approval than others
High internal locus - less likely to conform as they feel more responsible for their behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Definition

Social roles

A

Socially defined patterns of behaviour that are expected of a person who has a certain social role or is from a certain social background

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Standford Prison Experiment - Aim

A

To understand the psychological impact of situational forces by observing how healthy, typical individuals would conform to assigned roles of guards and prisoners

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Standford Prison Experiment - Procedure

A

Observational study - 24 male student ppts
All ppts were checked prior to ensure mental stability
Ppts were randomly assigned a role as prisoner or guard
Prisoners experienced an unexpected arrest, were given ID numbers, stripped and given a gown.
Guards were given a baton, uniform, sunglasses, whistle and were instructed to manage the prison without violence

Zimbardo oversaw the experiment - acted as chief prison superintendent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Standford Prison Experiment - Findings

A

Both prisoners and guards quickly lost individuality and took on their social roles. Prisoners failed at an attempt to resist
Some prisoners were released early as they had emotional breakdowns.
Guards became authoritative and some became sadistically aggressive
As a result of extreme responses from prisoners and guards the experiment was terminated after 6 days.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Zimbardo Methodology - AO3

A

^ Initial set up was controlled, It was ensured ppts were healthy and mentally stable without any criminal history. The roles were randomly allocated. This control supports that argument that behaviours were as a result of situational factors rather than individual dispositon.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Zimbardo Real World Application - AO3

A

Findings provide explanations for cruelty and abuse in institutional settings. For example the guards in Abu Ghraib, like those in SPE they performed very abusive behaviours. Recognising the impact of situational factors on human behaviour has led to practical application of increased training and oversight in military and law enforcement settings to prevent abuse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Zimbardo AO3 - Bias

A

Zimbardo took on a dual role as prison superintendent and lead investigator. This involvement may have lead to investigator bias. Zimbardo’s presence may have influenced the ppts behaviour to fit the expected outcomes of the study (demand characteristics) this raises concerns with the overall validity of the observed behaviours and conclusions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Zimbardo AO3 - Ethical Issues

A

Participants experienced significant psychological harm. Despite signs of emotional breakdown and extreme reactions of guards and prisoners, Zimbardo decide to procede with the experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Definition

Obedience

A

Behaviour in compliance with a direct command often issued by a person in a position of authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Milgram - Procedure
Advertised his study of obedience as a memory experiment to avoid any biases. His sample consisted of 40 american males who were greeted by a scientist and another ppt who acted as confederates. The naive ppt was always the teacher although to them it seemed randomly allocated. The ppt was told to administer the learner a shock for each incorrect answer increasing the voltage by 15v each mistake - the voltage went up to 450 The ppt heard responses to the shocks and after 300v complete silence suggesting severe harm to the learner The ppt was told that the scientist was fully responsible for any harm and was given prompts such as 'the experiment requires that you continue' and 'you have no other choice; you must go on
26
Milgram - findings
100% of ppts administered shocks upt to 300v 65% administer the maximum voltage of 450v Ppts showed visible signs of distress
27
# Definition and behaviour displayed Agentic state
A mental state in which an individual sees themselves as an agent (acting on behalf of) for an authority figure. The individual doesn't feel guilt or responsibility for their actions as they believe responsibility for their actions lies with the authority figure
28
# Definitition Autonomous state
An individual acts acoording to their principles and feels responsible for their actions.
29
Agentic shift
The movement from an autonomous state to an agentic one in the presence of an authority figure
30
Legitimacy of authority
Through socialisation, people learn their position within the social hierarchy. Individuals understand their position relative to those above and below them It is communicated through visible symbols such as uniforms and settings
31
# procedure, finidings and why What are Milgram's situational variables?
Proximity: Authority figure gave instructions over the phone - obedience dropped to 21% (less likely to remain in an agentic state) Location: Originally at Yale, replicated at run-down block office - obedience dropped to 47.5% (location decreased legitimacy of authority) Uniform: Researcher made an excuse to leave and was replaced by a confederate in regular clothes - obedience dropped to 20% (legitimacy of authority decline)
32
Milgram AO3 - Methodological flaws
The task using a shock generator lacks mundane realism. The study also lacks ecological validity as the environment of Yale university was not normal for ppts. Additionally findings may not be generalisable to the wider population especially women because of the sample used (40 men)
33
Milgram AO3 - dispositional factors
35% resisted the authority figure which cannot be explained by situational factors of agentic state and legitimacy of authority alone as each ppt has the same experience. However, Adorno's 'authoritarian personality' theory acknowledges that willingness to obey an authority figure may vary from person to person, offering an explanation as to why there are variations in Milgram's participants
34
Milgram AO3 - Unethical
Milgrams methods were considered highly unethical as participants had limited rights to withdraw and suffered emotional distress during the experiment. Ppts were also deceived about the type of study that was taking place, so they were unable to give informed consent. However, it can be argued the decisions made were necessary to conduct his research with limited inteferences. The temporary harm of ppts was worth it considering Milgram's impact on our understanding of obedience, from a cost-benefit perspective
35
AO3 Hofling
Conducted a field experiment in a hospital in which 22 real nurses were called by an unfamiliar voice claiming to be dr Smith and were ordered to administer a dose of an unfamiliar drug to a patient (dangerous order). The drug was a placebo, 21/22 nurses administered the drug suggesting even with a situation with ecological validity and mundane realism, people are still obedient to those who they feel have legitimacy of authority.
36
Authoritarian personality
Obedient people have a set of internal traits shaped in childhood by strict parenting and harsh punishments | They displace anger felt towards parents onto other minority groups.
37
# 5 traits Traits of an authoritarian personality
High respect for people with higher social status (leading to obedience. Hostile to people they see as having a low status Fixed stereotypes of about groups of people Conformists with conventional beliefs and behaviours Views on morality are dogmatic - clear ideas on what is right or wrong
38
# Definition F-scale
Questionnaire - people who scored high had fixed stereotypes, were dogmatic and dislike weak people F-scale measure 9 factors including authoritarian submission and powe/toughness | Created by Adorno
39
Adorno AO3 - Correlational
x Adorno's theory of link between an abusive childhood, the development of an authoritarian personality and obedience can only be studied using correlation. Whereas, agentic state and legitimacy of authority are supported by experimental research.
40
Authoritarian Personality AO3 - Oversimplified
Authoritarian personality can lead to stereotypes, where complex historical events like WW2 are overly simplified into personality flaws of the people involved. This approach risks reducing the accountability of social structures and leaders. It ignores how societal factors, laws and peer pressure lead people with non-authoritarian personalities to feel they need to participate in widespread obedience.
41
# Definition Resistance to social influence
The ability of individuals to oppose the pressure to conform to a majority or obey an authority figure by maintaining personal autonomy and integrity in their thoughts, decisions and actions
41
# Definition Social support
The presence of others who defy authority figures or go against the majortiy opinion gives the individual the confidence to stand against majority pressure or authoritarian commands.
42
# How? Social support
It is associated with the diffusion of responsibility, the more people who obey/dissent , the less severe the consequences are likely to be. It counters feelings of isolation, legitimising resistance.
43
# how? Resistance to conformity
Individuals with a dissenter (non-conformist ally) are more likely to resist conforming as the ally breaks the group's unanimity and creates and alternate group to belong to
44
# how? Resistance to obedience
Individuals with a disobedient role model are more likely to resist obeying commands from an authority figure as the role model undermines/challenges their legitimacy of authority
45
AO3 Social support - Milgram Variation
Milgram conducted a variation of his original study in which he gave the teacher (naive participant) social support - two extra confederates that acted as teacher. One of the teachers refused to continue at 150v and the other at 210v. In this variation conformity dropped from 65% to 10%. Milgram argues this reduction was due to the defiant actions of the peers, reducing the legitimacy of authority of the scientist.
46
# Who and definition Locus of Control
Rotter: What people consider to be the causes of their experiences and the factors that influence their successes or failures which influences how people perceive and interact with their environment
47
Internal locus of control
Believe they have personal control over their lives and the outcomes of their actions. They are more likely to take responsibilty for their actions
48
External locus of control
Believe external factors (luck, fate, powerful others etc.) control their lives. Less likely to feel responsibility for their actions.
49
AO3 LOC - Holland
Holland replicated Milgram's study, but also assessed ppts on their LOC. 37% of ppts with a internal loc refused to shock to the maximum voltage in comparison to 23% of those with an external loc. However, not all resisted, so this is only a partial explanation of resistance to SI.
50
AO3 Resistance to SI and LOC - Correlational
The relationship between SI and LOC is correlation, there are other related factors that affect resistance to SI such as level of social anxiety, personal morality. Individuals who see an action as morally wrong are more likely to resist regardless of social pressures and social status.
51
# Definition Minority Influence
When members of a majority a converted to the views of a majority
51
What factors can the effectiveness of a minority be affected by ?
Consistency: If members of the minority repeat the same message over time (diachronic) and all the members give the same message (synchronic) Commitment: If members of a minority are willing to suffer for their views but still hold them, majority will take their views seriously (augmentation principle) Flexibility: If seen as dogmatic, minorities will not be persuasive, they need the ability to appear to consider counterarguments and show they are reasonable by compromising (snowball effect)
52
# Definition Augmentation Principle
If someone performs an action despite the costs and risks, the underlying motive driving the action is considered strong
53
# Definition Snowball effect
Minorities changing majority opinions starts as a slow process as each person only converts a few members. The rate of conversion speeds up more as the minority view improves in its acceptability.
54
AO3 Minority Influence - Moscovici
36 blue slides of different shades were shown to 4 naïve participants and 2 confederates. When the minority (confederate) consistently claimed every slide was green, participants agreed on 8% of trials but only on 1% of trials when the minority was inconsistent which suggests consistency has been shown to help minorities influence members of the majority. However, 68% of ppts never conformed this may mean that few people are receptive to the influence of a consistent minority group Task is highly artificial so therefore lacks mundane realism. It may not be valid when generalised to real world minority influence
55
AO3 Minority Influences - Real-world examples
There are examples of minority groups using consistency, commitment and flexibility to influence the majority. For example the suffragettes showed commitments by going on hunger strike and the leaders of the civil rights movement delivered speeches with a consistent message of equality. The LGBTQIA+ rights movement campaigned for civil partnerships a strategic (flexible) compromise that ultimately led to their initial goal, the full legalisation of same-sex marriage.
56
# Definition Social Change
When a view held by a minority group challenges the majority and is eventually accepted. The whole society not just individuals adopt new attitudes, beliefs or behaviours
57
# and example Obedience - Social Change
Members of the government are a minority group that enact dramatic social change by creating laws. When laws are created, societies change to avoid punishment. Examples include making smoking indoors illegal, anti-discrimination laws and regulating behaviour during a pandemic.
58
# NSI and ISI Conformity - Social change
NSI: Behaviour or views can become the norm within a minority group, such as recycling, vaping or fitness in young people; those who go against this norm risk rejection. This norm can then spread to the broader society. ISI: Members of a minority can provide information to the majority, such as the effects of climate change. Wider society changes its behaviour because it accepts the new evidence.
59
# Definition Social Crypto-amnesia
Describes how society adopts ideas from a minority group; however, once the mainstream accepts these ideas and they become the norm, the sacrifices made by the minority group in initiating these positive social changes are not acknowledged but forgotten over time.
60
AO3 Social influence - Practical applications
It helps governments understand how to change people's behaviour. For example, persuade people to eat healthy or take sensible distancing precautions during a pandemic. In these cases, understanding social change can help the economy by reducing society's healthcare costs.
61
AO3 Social change - social sensitivity
Social change often occurs over extended periods, deals with highly sensitive topics, such as inequality, discrimination or social unrest and is the sum of the interactions of millions of members of society; for this reason, highly controlled experimental lab research on social change is not possible, meaning clear cause and effect relationships can't be established. Instead, researchers depend on natural experiments, case studies and correctional studies to understand social change.