Social Policies Flashcards
(29 cards)
1870 Forster Education act
- Introduced elementary schooling for 5-10 year olds in England and Wales
1944 Education Act
- Made secondary schools free and raised leaving age to 15
- Introduced tripartite system and 11+ exams to get into 3 types pf schools:
1) Grammar : passed 11+ and taught traditional subjects
2) secondary modern: 75-80% of pupils who failed the 11+ and taught basic education
3) technical schools: taught vocational and practical subjects
Issues with the tripartite system
- 11+ didnt measure intelligence as it was culturally biased, based on social class and legitimised class inequality
- Not many technical schools were built, so not many opportunities for those who wanted to take vocational courses. All schools were supposed to have equal value but this was undermined and grammar schools were seen as the best
- Those who failed were labelled as failures
- If middle class children failed their parents could afford to send them to private school
1965 Labour government made schools comprehensive
- Local Education Authorities (LEAs) reorganised most schools so that everyone had equality of opportunity
- Ran by local government
- Based on your catchment area
Strengths of comprehensive system
- No 11+ so 80% of children dont get labelled as failures
- High ability pupils still do better in this system
- Lower ability pupils do better in a comprehensive system than old secondary modern
Criticisms of comprehensive system
- Comprehensives in working class areas have worse GCSE results than those in middle class areas
- Schools in poorer areas are more likely to be underfunded leading them to have a worse education due to lack of resources and therefore schools are worse for working class pupils
why was there a Push for vocational education in 1976
- Labour PM said that decline in education and industry because skills needed to work weren’t being taught
-Since this all govs have made policies closing the link between school and work= increased vocationalism
Types of vocational reforms
- Youth training schemes= job training schemes for school leavers aged 16-17
- NVQ’s= practical qualifications
- The New Deal= people on benefits could go on courses if they didnt accept work
Criticisms of vocational education
- Argue it aims to teach good work discipline not skills
- (Marxists) vocational training provides cheap labour and that the government encourage people into these schemes to lower the unemployment stats
- Vocational qualifications arent valued as highly as academic qualifications
- (Feminists) forces girls into stereotypically ‘female’ jobs like beautician and childminder
1988 Education Reform Act (basics)
- Conservative gov introduced major reforms in education based on new right ideologies
They wanted to: - widen choice in the education system
- encourage more competition and create marketisation
1988 reform act:
Education linked to economy
- Introduced more vocational courses and more work placement schemes
1988 reform act:
National curriculum
- Introduced National curriculum for 5-16 year olds
- OFSTED sent to see how schools are doing, giving them ratings based on behaviour and achievement
- school could leave LEA and become grant maintained. Get money directly from the government and could choose to spend it how they liked, improving standards
1988 reform act:
system of choice and competition
- parents could choose which school to send their child to
- could use league tables to decide. These show how many pupils per school pass their exams and get good grades
- Worked like businesses and advertised for students
Criticisms of 1988 reform act
- Whitty (1998) argued middle class parents have the advantage. They have cultural capital to choose a good school for their child as well as pass down to their child. They also have financial captial which means they can move to an area with better schools. Increasing parental choice reinforces social class inequality
- testing is stressful for students and encourages labelling and self fulfilling prophecies
- Ball (1995) claimed the national cirriculum put too much emphasis on core subjects that were outdated and white washed
New Labour (1997-2010):
Followed third way ideas
- wanted to fight educational inequality but also wanted choice and diversity
- had old labour policies of state intervention but new right policies of marketisation combined = New labour
Aims of New Labour
(marketisation)
- Continued marketisation
- Allowed schools to specialise in things e.g. dance college to help increase diversity and choice for parents
- Allowed for faith schools to be set up
Aims of New Labour ( privatisation)
- made education more privatised
- gave agencies contracts e.g. improving reading and writing in primary schools
- improve efficiency and standards because contracts are competitive
Aims of New Labour: criticism (privatisation)
- some argue that privatisation takes too much control away from schools
Aims of New Labour (interventionist policies)
- reduced infant class sizes to maximum of 30
-introduced numeracy and literacy hour in primary schools - tried to increase the number of people who go to university
Aims of New Labour
(curriculum 2000)
- policy changed to make A-level education broader for 16-18 year olds
- Vocational a- level introduced
- Key skills qualifications were also launched and were supposed to be useful for all jobs
Policies aimed to promote gender equality (Girls)
-1988 National cirriculum gave all pupils equal entitlement to all subjects for the first time. This helped increase girls achievement
- GIST and WISE encourage girls to get involved into subjects they traditionally avoided
Policies aimed to promote gender equality (Boys)
- 1999 government gave grants to primary schools to hold extra hand writing sessions for boys to help them push up their SAT’s scores
- Breakthrough programme introduced mentoring, after-school classes and e-tutorial for teenage boys in attempting to improve their exam performance
New Labour policies aimed to reduce class inequality
- Compensatory education tries to make up for material and cultural deprivation by giving extra help to those who need it
- interventionist approach
New Labour:
compensatory policies
- Sure start began in 1999 offered free childcare and early education to 3+4 year olds
- Education Maintenance Allowance gave up to £30 a week to studenst who stayed in education post 16 (means tested)
- Free school meals and breakfast clubs aimed to reduce class inequality