Social Policy and Education (1) Flashcards
(130 cards)
Education and Social Policy definition
A set of plans or actions put into place by governments, local authorities or other organisations in order to address particular social problems.
What is social policy?
Social policy is a policy for dealing with social issues such as education, welfare, health care etc.
What are the aims of education policy?
- Economic efficiency (Britain maintains a successful workforce so they can compete in the global market).
- Raising educational standards (Pushing students to achieve their potential).
- Creating equality of opportunity (by judging people on their talent and ability rather than class, gender or ethnicity, this is called meritocracy) this would include equality of access, circumstances and participation.
What are the Left Wing views (New Labour) on education?
Aim to widen access and participation.
Aim to provide equality of opportunity/reduce inequalities.
Key policies: Compensatory education policies such as EMA, Sure Start, Curriculum 2000.
What are the New Right/Conservative/Coalition views on education?
Selection by schools is acceptable.
Aim to drive up standards (through competition).
Increase parental choice (parentocracy).
Key policies: ERA (1988) League tables, Free schools, Linear A-levels, A focus on British Values.
1870 - Forster Education Act
Aim: to formally educate children and create a competitive workforce.
Introduction of free compulsory education for children 6-12.
Before this act children were education in voluntary church schools or informally by the family.
1944 - Butler Education Act
Aim: to provide equality of opportunity. To suit a pupil’s education to their ability.
The 11+ exam/test
An IQ test on verbal, non-verbal and mathematic ability at age of 11.
The performance led to streaming into 3 types of secondary schools.
The Tripartite System
A system of splitting up of children from working class or middle class into three different types of schools; grammar, secondary modern and technical schools.
Criticisms of the Tripartite System
- Only 1 in 5 children passed the 11+ exam and went on to grammar schools.
- It is very difficult, if not impossible, to measure intelligence.
- 11 years of age is far too early to decide about a child’s future - late developers didn’t have a chance.
- Middle class children most likely to pass the 11+ and obtain grammar schools places as they can have more tutoring and read more.
Therefore the Tripartite System reinforced social class inequality and didn’t provide equality of opportunity.
1965 - comprehensive Education
Aims: provide equality of opportunity for all.
One secondary school for all.
Access based on catchment area - all abilities together.
Criticisms of the Comprehensive Education
- Branding and streaming - social class differences. Top band = MC. Bottom band = WC.
- Catchment areas tend to be the same type of class.
- Schools can end up being two big.
What are the differences between the Tripartite System and the Comprehensive System?
There is not ability differences in Comprehensive schools.
Also Comprehensive schools don’t have a exam in order to get in.
What are the advantages of the Comprehensive System over the Tripartite System?
It is more equal.
Children are all the same - ‘unity’.
What are the problems with Comprehensive schools? Why doesn’t it solve class inequality?
The catchment areas weren’t divided equally so they tried to keep all of the type of classes together.
If the catchment areas didn’t work they were branded and streamed meaning that MC would be in the top band and the WC would be in the bottom band.
Also some grammar schools still exist so people can still come.
1983 - Vocational Education
Examples.
Prepares trainees for jobs that are manual and practical - traditionally non-academic.
E.g. - Youth Training Scheme (YTS).
- National Vocational Qualifications (NVQs) - qualifications that laid down standards in particular occupations. These were often studied part time in colleges which students worked in an occupation.
- General National Vocational Qualifications (GNVQs) - boarder alternatives to academic courses that prepared pupils for work in a general occupation area such as leisure and tourism.
- The Youth Training Scheme (YTS) - a 2 year course that combined work experience with education. It was aimed at unemployed young people who were thought to lack basic skills. Employers were pain to take, and train, unemployed youths.
- Modern apprenticeships - combined work based training with attendance at a college to help young workers achieve NVQ’s.
What are the criticisms of Vocational training?
- Vocational training has produced a group of workers who are easily exploited. The skills taught on these schemes only prepare people for low paid and low skilled jobs.
- Some people argued that school leavers were ready to work as the majority of them already had part time jobs.
- Finn (1987) believes that these where just schemes designed to keep unemployment figures down at the time. By putting people into training they no longer were a statistic.
- There were no jobs available for these people even when they gained their qualifications - it was worthless.
- Provides nothing more than cheap labour.
- Seen as inferior to academic work.
1988 - Education Reform Act (ERA)
Aim: to improve educational standards.
It was felt that the best way to do this was to introduce a “market-place” in education. This would be achieved though completion and choice - MARKETISATION!
What is the Education Reform Act (ERA) also known as?
Baker act.
What do the Education Reform Act do?
Put pupils under pressure to get the best results.
Helped teachers improve their quality of teaching.
It improved results, facilities and management.
What did the Education Reform Act introduce?
The National Curriculum GCSEs replaced O levels and CSEs Coursework Parental choice (parentocracy) SATs League Tables Ofsted inspections
What did Marketisation produce and what does it mean?
Parentocracy - “ruled by the parents” - choice
What is parental choice?
Offers parents more choice about where to send their children; i.e. no longer automatically sending a child to their local schools. Leading to parentocracy.
What is the Myth of Parentocracy?
Parents don’t know how to access or know about things like league tables or ofsted reports - normally the working class.