Social Psychology Flashcards

1
Q

Define attitude.

A

A positive or negative evaluative reaction towards a stimulus, e.g. a person, action, object or concept

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define prejudice.

A

To judge, often negatively, without having relevant facts, usually about a group or its individual members

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define conformity.

A

The adjustment of individual behaviours, attitudes + beliefs to a group standard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

State 3 factors that affect conformity.

A

Group size: increases up to a group size of 5 (no increase thereafter)
Presence of a dissenter: 1 person disagreeing greatly reduces conformity
Culture: greater in collectivistic cultures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Describe the Asch study on conformity and what it showed.

A

Simple vision test comparing lengths of lines + put a subject in the room with several actors who all chose the wrong answer
Majority of people conformed when everyone else chose the wrong answer
In the control group, < 1% conformed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define obedience.

A

Compliance with commands given by an authority figure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

State 4 factors influencing obedience.

A

Remoteness of the victim
Closeness + legitimacy of the authority figure
Diffusion of responsibility (obedience increases when someone else takes the blame)
NOT personal characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe the Milgram experiment on obedience.

A

1 learner + 1 teacher
They were told the experiment studied the effect of punishment on memory + to deliver increasingly intense shocks as the actor made increasing mistakes
Even though the shock had reached a fatal level when the actor seemed unconscious or even dead, the majority of subjects still obeyed the commands

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define Social Loafing.

A

The tendency for people to expend less individual effort when working in a group than when working alone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

State 4 factors that make social loafing more likely to occur.

A

Person believes that the individual performance is not being monitored
Task/ group has less value or meaning to the person
Person generally displays low motivation to strive for success
Person expects other group members will display high effort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

In which gender and cultures are social loafing more likely to occur?

A

All male groups

Individualistic cultures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

When might social loafing disappear?

A

Individual performance is being monitored
Members highly value their group/ task goal
Groups are smaller
Members are of similar competence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define group polarisation.

A

The tendency for people to make decisions that are more extreme when they are in a group as opposed to a decision made alone/ independently

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define group think.

A

The tendency of group members to suspend critical thinking because they are striving to seek agreement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

State 4 situations that make group think more likely to occur.

A
Group...
is under high stress to reach a decision 
is insulated from outside input 
has a directive leader 
has high cohesiveness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the 5 steps of the Bystander effect?

A

Notice the event
Decide whether it really is an emergency (social comparison: see how others are responding)
Assuming responsibility to intervene (diffusion of responsibility: believe someone else will help)
Self-efficacy in dealing with the situation
Decision to help (based on cost-benefit analysis e.g. danger)

17
Q

State 2 methods of overcoming the Bystander effect.

A
Reduce restraints on helping:  
Reduce ambiguity + increase responsibility 
Enhance guilt + concern for self-image 
Socialise altruism:
Teaching moral inclusion 
Modelling helpful behaviour  
Attributing helpful behaviour to altruistic motives  
Education about barriers to helping
18
Q

Describe the Bystander effect experiment by Darley and Latane and describe the results it obtained.

A

Participants to take part in a discussion about ‘personal problems’ over the radio
An actor in the adjacent room pretended to have a seizure
When alone: majority of participants helped
When in a group of 4: ~30% helped
When in a group of >4: hardly anyone helped

19
Q

Outline the 3 leadership styles described by Kurt Lewin.

A

Authoritarian/autocratic style: all decision making done by leader. Don’t listen to suggestions of subordinates
Democratic/participative: makes decisions after consulting group
Laissez-faire/ free reign style: leaves the group entirely to itself

20
Q

According to planned behaviour theory, what might externally influence our attitudes?

A

Beliefs about important others’ attitude towards a behaviour
Builds a subjective norm

21
Q

Define cognitive dissonance

A

A conflict between thoughts, beliefs or attitudes

22
Q

How may cognitive dissonance be resolved?

A

Behavioural change e.g. quit smoking
Acquire new information e.g. seeking exceptions- old aged smokers
Reduce importance of cognitions e.g. convince themselves it is better to “live for the moment”

23
Q

How can a message be more effective in changing attitudes?

A
If it:
reaches recipient
is attention grabbing 
is easily understood
is relevant + important 
is easily remembered
24
Q

How can a messenger be more persuasive in changing attitudes?

A

Credible e.g. DR
Trustworthy e.g. objective
Appealing e.g. well presented

25
Q

What does “Framing” refer to?

A

Whether a message emphasises the benefits or losses of that behaviour
For detecting illness: loss-framed= more effective
For preventing illness: gain-framed= more effective

26
Q

Define stereotype

A

Generalisations made about a group/ member of that group e.g. race, gender

27
Q

Define discrimination

A

Behaviours that follow from negative evaluations/ attitudes towards members of particular groups

28
Q

What case prompted Darley + Latane to carry out their studies?

A

Kitty Genovese stabbed to death whilst 38 people watched but none intervened or called the police
Hypothesised: Presence of other people makes us less likely to respond in an emergency

29
Q

Describe the positives and negatives of autocratic leadership

A
\+:
Quick decision making
Heirachy of responsibility
-
Demotivating
Can lead to errors
30
Q

Describe the positives and negatives of democratic leadership

A
\+
Wins cooperation + motivates team
Improved quality of decision making
-
Time consuming
Can lead to disagreement
31
Q

Describe the positives and negatives of laissez faire leadership

A
\+
Allows autonomous working
Allows utilisation of expertise
- 
Can lead to lack of direction
Lack of ultimate responsibility holder