Social Stratification Flashcards
(255 cards)
What is social stratification?
- Social stratification describes the way society is structured into a hierarchy of unequal strata or layers
- Stratification involves inequality between groups in the distribution of resources such as wealth, income, status and power
- A social hierarchy is shaped like a pyramid and each layer is more powerful than the one below it
- The most privileged group in society forms the top layer and the least privileged form the bottom layer
- The group at the top of the hierarchy has much more wealth, income, status or power than the one at the bottom
What is social inequality?
Social inequality refers to the uneven distribution of:
- resources such as money and power
- opportunities (or life chances) related to things like education or employment
What do studies of inequality explore?
- the nature and extent of inequality
- why some people get more resources and opportunities than others
- how resources and opportunities are unequal between individuals and groups based on their social class, gender, ethnicity and age
What is wealth?
Ownership of assets, e.g., property, land, shares and money in savings accounts.
What is income?
Cash, e.g., from a salary or company benefits such as use of a company car.
What is status?
Social standing or rank of an individual in society due to wealth, career or social influence.
What is power?
The ability of an individual or group to get what they want despite opposition from others, e.g., getting a law passed.
What is the main form of stratification in the UK today?
- In the UK today, social class is seen as the main form of stratification
- Social class is based on economic factors such as occupation and income
What percentage of people in the UK are upper, middle and working class?
- upper class - 10% (most power, income, wealth + status)
- middle class - 50%
- working + underclass - 40% (least power, income, wealth + status)
How do stratification systems differ?
- Stratification systems differ depending on whether a person’s status is ascribed or achieved
- Stratification systems also differ according to how open and closed they are, i.e., how easily social mobility can occur
What is ascribed status?
social position is fixed at birth and is unchanging over time, such as being born into the royal family
What is achieved status?
social position is earned based on personal talent or merit, such as getting all 9s in your GCSEs, which is based on ability and effort
What is an open system?
An individual’s position is achieved and social mobility can occur, e.g., between social classes
What is a closed system?
An individual’s position is ascribed and social mobility is less likely to occur, e.g., the caste system in India
What is slavery (as a stratification system)?
- Slavery existed as a form of stratification by race in Ancient Greece, Rome and the southern states of America in the 19th century
- Under slavery, white slave owners claimed the right to own black slaves and treated them as property (or chattel)
- An individual’s social position was ascribed at birth, so children born to slaves were automatically slaves too; the system was closed
- The racial stratification of Americans continued through segregation laws, which were abolished in 1964 in America due to the Civil Rights Movement
What is feudalism?
- The feudal system operated in medieval Europe as a form of stratification
- There were four layers in society called estates
- Everybody in the community pledged loyalty to the king, whose power was regarded as God-given
- An individual’s position in society was ascribed and there was little or no chance of moving up to the next estate; the system was closed
- It was unthinkable for people from different estates or social classes to get married
What is the caste system in traditional India?
- The caste system in India is another form of stratification linked to the Hindu religion
- An individual’s social position is ascribed at birth, as people are born into a particular caste; the system is closed
- Each caste was traditionally associated with particular occupations
- Inequality between different groups was justified as stemming from religious beliefs
What was the Apartheid?
- Apartheid in South Africa (1948–1994) was based on a government policy of racial segregation
- Ethnicity was used as the basis for stratification
- A person’s social position was ascribed at birth so the system was closed as there was little scope for social mobility
- Because apartheid existed in every sphere of society, a person’s access to jobs, housing, healthcare, and education was segregated based on their race
What is the key study for the Functionalist Theory of Social Stratification?
Davis & Moore (1945)
What do Davis & Moore (1945) believe about social stratification?
- American functionalist sociologists Davis + Moore argue that all societies are stratified and have social inequality
- They believed that role allocation was needed for society to survive and operate efficiently
- Some positions are functionally more important for society than others, as they provide essential services and ensure society’s survival over time (e.g. doctors, surgeons, dentists, lawyers and judges)
- These functionally important roles require people with exceptional talent, skills and abilities, which only a minority of individuals have (they undertake lengthy and costly education and training, which involves making sacrifices)
- To attract such individuals, these roles must offer desirable rewards, such as high pay + status (an incentive)
- Stratification is functionally necessary for society because it ensures that the most talented people train for and fill the most important jobs
- All societies must have some degree of inequality built into them, which is functional as people accept it as fair
What do Davis & Moore believe it is necessary to happen for society to operate effectively?
- all roles must be filled
- they must be filled by those best able to perform them
- effective training must take place for the roles
- roles must be performed conscientiously
What are criticisms of Davis & Moore?
- Occupations which carry less prestige or lower economic rewards can also be seen as functionally important to society (E.g. nurses + refuse collectors)
- Differences in status + pay between different occupational groups may be due to differences in their power rather than the functional importance of their position (e.g. MPs who are paid more than nurses)
- There is no evidence that exceptional talent is required for important positions in society or an agreed method of measuring talent and ability (e.g. there is no formal educational requirement for Government ministers)
- There may be far more talented people in society than Davis and Moore indicate - the best way to develop their potential may not be through unequal rewards (e.g. the Prime Minister, for example, is paid far less than the CEO of a typical major corporation)
- Talented people do not necessarily make sacrifices during their training - they can earn back any income lost during the training period in the first 10 years of their work
- Contrary to what David and Moore believe, society is not meritocratic - equal opportunities do not exist and social mobility is not widespread
What is a marxist criticism of Davis & Moore?
- Rather than seeing stratification as functional, Marxists view it as a means by which a privileged minority exploit others
- Neither inequality nor stratification is inevitable
What is the key study for the Marxist Theory of Social Class?
Marx (1857-1967) - Social class in the 19th century