SocialPsych2 Flashcards

(58 cards)

1
Q

Norman triplett

A

published first study of social psychology, investigated effect of competition on performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

William McDougall

A

1 of first textbooks on social Psych

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

E.H. Ross

A

1 of first textbooks on social Psych

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Verplank

A

social approbal influences behavior- conversation changes by feedback

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Reinforcement Theory

A

behavior motivated by anticipated rewards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Social Learning theories

A

Bandura, challenged early reinforcement theories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Role Theory

A

aware of social roles, behavior follows

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Attitudes

A

Cognition or beliefs, feelings, and behavioral predisposition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Balance Theory

A

Fritz Heider, how 3 things relate, harmony or stress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Free Choice Dissonance

A

Free and equal decision, creats post-decision dissonance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Spreading of Alternative

A

Highlight positives of chosen, negatives of unchosen to remove dissonance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Forced Compliance Dissonance

A

Forced into behavior inconsistant with belief (by reward or punishment)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Insufficient justification effect

A

reduce dissonance by changing internal cognition if external justification is minimal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Self Perception Theory

A

Daryl Belm, When attitudes are weak or ambiguous, observe behavior and atrribute an attitude to self

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Overjustification effect

A

Rewarded heavily for something initially enjoy, may not enjoy any longer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Carl Hovland

A

Attitude change through persuasion: communicator, communication, environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Hovland’s Model

A

Credibility important, submarine report

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Sleeper effect

A

Overtime, low-credibility source has greater influence, while highly credibile source is diminished

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Elaboration likelihood model of persuasion

A

Petty and Cacioppo, central & peripheral routes to persuassion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Central Route to Persuasion

A

care deeply, closely evaluate argument by developing counterarguments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Peripheral Route to persuassion

A

Don’t care as much, strength of argument not important, who, how, and where important

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

William McGuire

A

Analogy of Inoculation, resistance to persuasion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Cultural truisms

A

Beliefs that are seldom questioned, vulnerable to attack because not use to defending

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Refuted Counterarguments

A

Become innoculated, practice defending beliefs

25
Social Comparison Theory
Festinger, 1.Evaluate self by objective nonsocial means unless cant 2. less similarities, less comparison between 3. discrepancy, change own position inline with group
26
Stanley Schachter
greater anxiety=greater desire to affiliate, more comfortable with other anxious people
27
Gain-Loss Principle
Aronson and Linder, evaluation that changes has more impact than a constant one (like someone more who has increased liking towards us)
28
Social Exchange Theory
Weigh rewards/costs of interacting with someone
29
Equity Theory
Measure not only personal rewards/costs, but those of other person, want to be equsal
30
Need Complementarity
Choose relationships so that they mutually satisfy each others needs
31
Robert Zajonc
Mere-exposure research
32
Batson's Empathy-Altruism model
Feel either distress or empathy, if empathy, more likely help regardless of easy or hard escape (take place of person receiving shock)
33
Frustration-aggression Hypothesis
Feel frustrated, act aggressively
34
Social Learning Theory
Bandura, learn through modeling or reinforcement
35
Autokinetic effect
stare at light in dark room, light appears to move
36
Sherif Conformity
Autokinetic effect, estimates of movement changed in line with the group vs solitary
37
Conformity
Milgrim, Sherif, Asch
38
Clark & Clark
Doll Preference, white and black girls
39
Attribution Theory
Heider, infer causes of other people's behavior: dispositional or situational
40
Fundamental Attribution error
For others, dispositional. For self, situational
41
M.J. Lerner
Belief in a just world
42
Theodore Newcomb
Bennington College, students became more liberla, adopting norm of community. Analyzed voting by grade
43
Edward Hall
Norms on how close to stand to someone based on relationship (Proxemics)
44
Zajonc
presence of others increases arousals and enhances dominant responses
45
Zimbardo
Prison experiment, act more antisocial when feel anonymous. Deindividuation
46
Irving Janis
Groupthink, strive for consensus so don’t condifer discordant info--examined history failures
47
Risky Shift
Group decisions riskier than individual: Value hypothesis- when riskiness is culturally valued
48
James Stoner
Decision between keeping baby that could hurt mother, chose towards caution--discrepant with risky shift
49
Group Polarization
Decisions become more extreme, riskier or more cautious in group, leaning towards origional view
50
Kurt Lewin
Autocratic, democratic, laissez-faire leadership styles for after school groups.
51
Autocratic Leader
Boys more hostile, aggressive, dependent on leader
52
Democratic leader
Most satisyfing and cohesive for members, more motivation and interest
53
Laizzes-fair leaders
low efficiency, organization, satisfaction
54
Prisoner's Dilemma
Cooperation and competition standard
55
Robber's Cave
Muzafer Sherif, group cohesion, then competition, then cooperation to repair relationship
56
Superordinate goals
goals to get two disinterested groups to cooperate
57
Bem
Self-Perception theory, alternative to cognitive dissonance
58
Eagly
Suggested gender differences in conformity werent due to gender but social roles