Sociology: Theories and Institutions 11.1 [HY] Flashcards
(37 cards)
Psychologists vs Sociologists
psychologists focus on the behaviors of individuals, sociologists focus on the way groups organize and interact
Micro level (Sociology)
family groups and local communities
Meso level (Sociology)
organizations, institutions, and ethnic subcultures
Macro level (Sociology)
national and international systems
Theoretical approaches to sociology used to
help analyze and explain aspects of human social behavior
Symbolic interactionism
- Studies how humans interact and communicate using language, writing, and other symbols
- attempts to understand
human action and interaction by studying the symbols we use to communicate
3 main assumptions of symbolic interactionism
- Humans act toward symbols based on the meanings that these symbols carry.
- The meanings symbols carry come from social interaction.
- Humans interpret the meaning of symbols, and this interpretation influences action.
Symbolic Interactionism in Human vs Dogs
lower animals simply respond to stimuli, while humans have the capability to interpret the stimulus first, then react
Major limitation of symbolic interactionism
it overlooks macrolevel
structures, like cultural norms or class interactions
Social constructionism
- the attempt to understand a society through the study of the society’s social constructs
- Abstract ideas might also
be social constructs; like honor and justice rely on group agreement among individuals within a given society, and these concepts are therefore social constructs - useful for explaining micro- and meso-level sociological phenomena.
Limit of social constructionism
this theory cannot account for
macro-level sociological phenomena
Rational choice theory
- micro- to meso-level approach to sociology
- focuses on individual decision making
- humans will make rational choices to further their own self-interests
- becomes a model of sociology when this idea of rational transactions is applied to the social interaction
- views all social interactions as
transactions that take into consideration the benefits and harms to the
individual. - chooses the option that results in the greatest social benefit
Exchange theory
- People stay in relationships because they get something from the exchange, and they leave relationships when there are more social costs than benefits.
Limitation of rational choice (exchange) theory
does not easily explain charitable, illogical, unselfish, or
altruistic behavior
Conflict theory (Marx)
a macro theory that attempts to understand society by examining the inevitable conflicts between groups in society
Capitalist (bourgeoisie) class Marx
- private ownership naturally leads to a small, wealthy capitalist (bourgeoisie) class, who control the means of production
- rest of society is relegated to a lower worker (proletariat) class
- Because the capitalist class owns the means of production, this class has power over the worker class, and the disparity in power and resources between these two groups leads to conflict
Modern conflict theory
- examines any conflict
between groups with more power and those with less - whereas Marx focused specifically on conflict between capitalists and workers
- conflict might exist between people of different generations, different religions, or different regions of a country.
- individuals in the group with more power attempt to preserve their power by shaping the structure of society itself. The group with more power uses their influence to dictate the laws, customs, and cultural norms of the society.
- for the more powerful in society, maintenance of the status quo is usually desirable, and for the less powerful, change comes through
disruption and revolution
Interest Groups
- if people in lower-status
positions recognize the power differential and see that others share a common dissatisfaction, then these individuals can organize - they can use tools such as protesting or voting to enact change and equalize power
Limits of Modern conflict theory
- not very effective for explaining the choices of individuals in society.
- tend to focus on social stress and disharmony, so conflict theory is less effective than some other models at explaining social cohesion, cooperation, and altruism.
Structural-functionalism
- Inverse of conflict theory
- concerned with social cohesion and stability
- compared society to
an organism and proposed that each group in society has a role to play in the overall health and operation of society. These roles might be very different, in the same way that different organs or even different cells have very different functions within an organism, but each is important *and has a function
Manifest function (structural-functionalism)
an intended consequence of the actions of a group within a society
Latent function (latent functions)
unintended but beneficial consequences
Dysfunctions
negative consequences of the existence of an institution, organization, or interaction
Limits of structural functionalism
- focuses on social cohesion and equilibrium, this approach is not well suited for explaining social change.
- does not explain how individuals interact
within a group only how groups
interact with other groups