speech audiometry - exam 2 Flashcards

1
Q

speech audiometry

A

assessment of hearing ability using a speech stimulus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

benefits of using a speech stimulus

A

natural stimulus - we rarely hear pure tones in nature

individuals may have good sensitivity but have difficulty processing speech - more complex stimulus

very useful for assessment of intervention needs - insurance only covers unless speech perception is assessed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

speech intelligibility index / audibility index

A

quantify how much speech will likely be understood from the audiogram

basically measure the same thing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

speech banana

A

we can guess what speech sounds someone will hear based on the audiogram

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

speech processing levels (easiest –> hardest)

A

detection/awareness

discrimination

identification/recognition

comprehension

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

which levels most common in speech audiometry

A

detection & identification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

speech stimuli options

A

monitored live voice - difficult because you have to make sure your voice is perfectly calibrated

recorded - already standardized

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

speech detection threshold (SDT)

A

lowest level at which listener can detect speech

threshold for stimulus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

speech recognition test (SRT)

A

lowest level at which listener can understand speech

threshold for speech identification/recognitioin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

word recognition score (WRS)

A

ability to identify/distinguish speech at supra threshold (above threshold, usually conversation level) levels

usually done w/ background noise so more realistic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

SDT stimuli type

A

“aaaaa”

“baba”

patient’s name

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

SRT stimuli type

A

spondees

(2 syllable words w/ equal stress)

hotdog
cupcake
airplane

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

WRS stimuli type

A

phonetically balanced words - CVC words

25-50 words per list

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

SDT procedure

A

similar to audiometry - raise hand as soon as you hear something

monitored live voice or recorded

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

SDT results

A

will never be >5 dB higher than PTA

should be at or below PTA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

SDT used…

A

often in hard to test populations to confirm pure tone audiometry or as only measure of hearing threshold

17
Q

SRT results

A

level at which the listener can repeat at least 50% of spondee words correctly at a given intensity

18
Q

SRT familiarize, why?

A

recognition test, want them to know what they’re looking for

19
Q

SRT threshold search

A

same as SDT

correct REPETITION of the word, not just detection

patient repeats 3 spondees correctly at a given level

20
Q

SRT results

A

should be worse than SDT - easier to detect speech than to identify & repeat the word

should be in agreement w/ PTA (withing 5-10 dB)

21
Q

SRT better than PTA

A

may be high freq hearing loss

22
Q

SRT worse than PTA

A

elderly

central processing disorders

fakers

23
Q

WRS use

A

assess if the individual is able to understand speech when presented at a suprathreshold level

extent of speech recognition difficulty
determines retro cochlear loss

24
Q

PBK

A

WRS stimuli

phonetically balanced kindergarten

child friendly lists for kids 3.5 & younger

25
WIPI
WRS stimuli word intelligibility by picture identification presented w/ 6 pictures identify which one they heard
26
NU - CHIPS
WRS stimuli childrens perception of speech similar to WPI
27
WRS presentation level
present words at 60 dB HL (normal Convo level) for people w/ normal hearing present 30-40 dB above SRT can also find MCL (most comfortable listening level - "if ur listening to me on the radio, what level would you leave it at")
28
WRS procedure
no familiarization report % correct for each ear & whether scores are consistent w/ audiogram (if normal --> should have 92% or better) if scores are abnormal or have changed significantly - refer to ENT
29
WRS variables
live-voice vs recorded male vs female talkers carrier phrase vs no carrier phrase level of presentation competing speech, SNR
30
open set vs closed set
open = no defined list closed = set list of words to choose from
31
WRS interpretation
90-100 = within normal limits 75-90 = slight difficulty 60-75 = moderate difficulty 50-60 = poor <50 = very poor
32
WRS rollover
can be used to test for retrocochlear pathology rollover - performance gets poorer w/ increases in level (normally - play it louder, performance stays the same) if PBMin <45% of PBMax, VIII CN lesion is likely
33
UCL
uncomfortable loudness level at which speech becomes uncomfortbale doesn't go up w/ hearing loss, may even go down
34
purpose of MCL & UCL
hearing aid selection & fitting WRS presentatioin
35
MCL & UCL stimuli
running speech tones
36
MCL & UCL procedure
present words at diff levels & have listener rate loudness on a scale from extremely soft to uncomfortably loud
37
what type of noise should be used to mask speech
broadband because speech is broadband white noise speech-shaped noise - noise w/ a speech-like spectrum
38
speech audiometry masking
SRT (TE) - IA >= best BC thresholds (NTE)