Stat Interpretation Flashcards

(36 cards)

1
Q

What is stat interpretation?

A

Process by which judges decide what particular word statues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why might parliament include interpretation sections from the interpretation act 1978

A

1)In order to help understand the law
2) Helps clarify meaning of statute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why do many cases come before the courts?

A

1) dispute over meaning of an act
2) courts must decide exact meaning of particular word or phrase

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

5 reasons why act is unclear ?

A

1) Broad term
2) Ambiguity
3) Drafting error
4) New development
5) Changes in language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Explain broad term

A

May be words designed to cover several possibilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Case for broad term

A

Brock 1993 -

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Explain ambiguity

A

Word can have more than one meaning so unclear which meaning used

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explain drafting error

A

Drafting of legislation may be hurried

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Explain new development

A

New tech mean old act of parliament doesn’t cover present day situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Change in use of lanaguage

A

Meaning of words change over time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are 4 approches to interpretation of legislation

A

1) literal rule
2) golden rule
3) mischief rule
4) purposive approach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define literal rule

A

Involves looking at the dictionary definition of words to interpret meaning in law , gives words plain ordinary meaning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Case for literal rule

A

R v Harris - D bit off Vs nose but biting wasn’t under the words in act of ‘ stab, cut, wound ‘ , D not guilty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

4 advantages of literal rule

A

1) most agree on ordinary meaning of a word
2) meanings of law don’t have to be tested
3) helps maintain parliament position of lawmakers
4) not open to interpretation by judges

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

3 Disadvantages of literal rule

A

1) words are ambiguous
2) when laws are drafted mistakes can be made
3) doesn’t have flexibility so may make law unfair

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Define golden rule

A

Court should take literal meaning unless led to an absurdity , if this is case court should use common sense and choose most sensible meaning

17
Q

Two views on how golden rule should be used

A

narrow application
wide application

18
Q

Explain narrow application and a case

A

If only one meaning that must be taken
Allen 1872 - accused of bigamy , guilty under golden rule

19
Q

Explain wide application and a case

A

Words have one meaning but their interpretation would lead to verdict against public
RE Sigworth - son murdered mom she hadn’t made a will, court held golden rule can’t apply as he murdered her so shouldn’t benefit from inheritance of profit

20
Q

Define mischief rule

A

applied to find out what parliament meant , looks for the wrong which statute was trying to correct and statute interpreted on this basis

21
Q

Case for mischief rule

A

Heydon 1584 - dispute over land owning rights , judges encouraged to look at previous law and explore what was wrong to fix it

22
Q

3 advantages of mischief rule

A

1) fills In gaps in law
2) promotes purpose of act
3) creates a purposive approach

23
Q

3 disadvantages of mischief rule

A

1) risk of judicial law making
2) not as wide as purposive approach
3) just fills in gaps

24
Q

Define purposive approach

A

looks for what parliament intended and APPLIES it to case in hand

25
Case for purposive approach
Royal college nursing v DHSS 1981 - abortion legal in uk but only doctors can perform it , 3 judges decided nurses can as well and 2 judges took literal view and said act was clear nurses can perform it
26
2 Advantage of purposive approach
1) goes beyond mischief rule as court not interested in previous gaps in law only current issues relevant 2) judges decided what they believe parliament is meant to achieve
27
2 Disadvantages of purposive approach
1) HOL don't like it as they say it is not up to courts to correct what is wrong in law 2) may be difficult to know what parliaments intention actually was
28
2 Impacts of European Law 1973
1) judges have to adapt their style of interpretation 2) eu laws are less specific than uk style of drafting , judged now have to adapt this approach
29
2 Impacts of human rights act 1988
1) legislation must be read in a way that is compatible with HR
30
example of something achieved by humans right act
same sex couples living together have equal rights of those living together as husband and wife
31
Internal aid
matters within statue itself that make it more clear
32
3 examples of instrinsic aid
1) long title to explain what act is achieving 2) schedules at the end explaining reasonableness tests more 3) interpretation sections
33
Extrinsic aid
documents or matters which are outside of act but try and make it more clearer
34
5 examples of extrinsic aid
1) dictionaries to help understand meaning 2) treaties to understand foreign law and English law used in other countries 3) hansard which is a document used to report what was said in parliament when act was debated 4) law commission reports 5) earlier case law
35
Case for Hansard not allowed
David v Johnson
36
Case for Hansard allowed
Pepper v Hart