State crimes Flashcards

1
Q

What are war crimes and use Nazis as an example

A

War crimes can be committed by individuals, groups and the state they are punishable offences. Thank you direct attacks against of civilians,torture or inhumane treatment of Prisoners. War crimes trials were held at numberg To prosecute prominent Nazis after the Second World War.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Examples of why it is problematic and controversial to decide what is a war crime, and who is a war criminal & gorgebush

A

Some examples include the atomic bombs dropped on hiroshima and nagasaki. More recently, some commentators have argued that the war in Iraq was an illegal war, and that George Bush should be tried for war crimes because thousands of people died as a result of the conflict

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is genocide.

A

Refers to violent crimes, committed against national ethnic, racial or religious groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is a more recent example of genocide

A

Darfur: Where is Civil War have been raging since 1993. Wasn’t organised campaign by militants. aim is to wipe out 80 black African groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

William chambliss

A

Argues that sociologist should investigate, stay organised crime, as well as crimes of capitalism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

penny green and tony ward

A

Define state crime is illegal or deviant activities. It includes or form of crime committed by or on behalf of states and government.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

eugene mclaughlin four categories of state crime

A

One: political crimes, for example, corruption, and censorship
2: Crimes by security and police forces, such as genocide and torture
3: Economic crimes, for example, violations of health and safety
4: Social and cultural crimes, such as institutional racism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The power of the state enables it to commit extremely large-scale and widespread victimisation, for example

A

Cambodia, where they killed the 2 million people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

michalowski & kramer Note, great power, and great crimes inseparable. They argue that we need to study…

A

The way is the economic and political elite can bring death, disease, and loss of tens of thousands of the single decision

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The state monopoly of violence

A

Gives it the potential to inflict massive harm. Media attention is often on state crimes, committed by thousand watt dictatorships. Demetre Cratic states such as Britain have also been guilty of crimes such as military use of torture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Principle of national sovereignty 

A

States the supreme authority within their own borders, it makes it very difficult for external authorities to intervene. Despite the existence of international conventions and law against attacks, such as genocide.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The state is also the source of law argument

A

It is the state’s role to define what is criminal and manage the criminal justice system. The law also means that it can Avoid defending its own harmful actions, such as Nazi Germany, who created laws for their crime. 

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

One approach to the study of state crime is through the notion of human rights. There is no single agreed list of what constitutes human rights. However, most definitions include the following.
(Natural rights)

A

That people are regarded as having simply by virtue of existing. Such as rights to life, liberty and free-speech.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

One approach to the study of state crime is through the notion of human rights. There is no single agreed list of what constitutes human rights. However, most definitions include the following.
Civil rights

A

Civil rights, such as the right to vote, to privacy, to fair trial, or to education

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Crime is the violation of human rights
herman & julia shwendinger

A

Argue that we should define crimes in terms of the violation of basic human rights, than the breaking of legal rules. For example, states of practice, racism, or sexism or committing crimes. The view is an example of transgressive criminology, sent over steps, traditional boundaries of criminology that are defined by criminal law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

shwendingers Object to the idea that:

A

A man who steals a son can be called a criminal, bus agents of the state can legally reward men who destroy food, so the price levels can be maintained.

17
Q

stanley cohen Criticises, the shwendingers view how?

A

For example, was gross violations of human rights, such as genocide and torture or clearly crimes, but other asks like economic exploitation, or not self-evidently criminal. Even if they are morally unacceptable.

18
Q

What are the criticisms for shwendingers

A

There is only limited agreement on what counts as a human right

19
Q

Although cohen criticised the shwendingers, He sees the issue of human rights and state crime, as increasingly central both political debate and criminology as a result of what two factors

A

The growing impact of the international human rights movement. And the increased focus within criminology upon victims.

20
Q

cohen Is interested in the ways in which state conceal legitimise their human rights crimes. He argues that wall dictatorships, generally deny committing human rights. Abuses democratic states have to legitimise actions. They follow a three stage spiral of state denial
What is stage one?

A

It didn’t happen. For example, the state claims there was no massacre. But then human rights organisations, victims and the media saw that it did happen.

21
Q

cohen Is interested in the ways in which state conceal legitimise their human rights crimes. He argues that wall dictatorships, generally deny committing human rights. Abuses democratic states have to legitimise actions. They follow a three stage spiral of state denial
Stage two

A

If it didn’t happen, it is something else. The state says that it is not what it looks like, and then it’s collateral damage or self defence.

22
Q

cohen Is interested in the ways in which state conceal legitimise their human rights crimes. He argues that wall dictatorships, generally deny committing human rights. Abuses democratic states have to legitimise actions. They follow a three stage spiral of state denial
Istage three

A

Even if it is what you say is, it’s justified to protect national scrutiny, or the fight in the war on terror

23
Q

cohen neutralisation theiry, what is it & 5 points

A

Examined on the ways in which state and the officials denied or justified their crime.
Denial of victim, denial of injury, Denial of responsibility, condemning the condemners. Appeal to higher loyalty.

24
Q

kelman & hamilton Identify three features that produce crimes of obedience.

A

Authorisation (approved by those in authority), routinisation (pressure to turn the crime into a routine), dehumanisation,

25
Q

Chamber list, define state crime as acts define bylaw as criminal and condemn by state officials in pursuit of their jobs as representatives of the state. What are some criticisms of this? 

A

It ignores the fact that state have the power to make laws, so they can avoid criminalising their own actions. They can also make laws to allow them to carry out harmful acts such as Nazis.

26
Q

Social harms, and zeminology. (mochalowski)

A

Define state crime is including not just a legal acts but also legally permissible act’s has consequences are similar to those of illegal acts act.

27
Q

What is zemiology

A

The study of harms, whether or not they are against the law

28
Q

Critics argue that a harms definition is very vague, what did they say?

A

There is a danger that makes the field to Wide, as what level of harm is defined a crime
Who decides what counts as a harm?

29
Q

Labelling and societal reaction.

A

Labelling theory argues whether an act constitutes a crime depends on whether the social audience Defined it as a crime. Saying that crime is socially constructed.

30
Q

Labelling and social reaction can be seen as even vaguer then social harms, other crit

A

Ignores the fact that audiences definition may be manipulated by ruling class ideology

31
Q

International law What is it, advantages and disadvantages?

A

Hello, created an agreement between states such as turnover. An advantage as it doesn’t depend on the sociologists own personal definitions of harm. However, like the laws made by individual states it is a social construction. Another limitation is that international law focuses largely on war crimes and crimes against humanity, rather than at the state crimes like corruption.

32
Q

What are the two types of human rights?

A

Natural rights and civil rights

33
Q

What is the authoritarian personality? (adorno et al)

A

To identify this includes a willingness to obey the orders of superiors without questions.

34
Q

Crimes of obedience.

A

Many people are willing to obey authority, even when it involves harming others

35
Q

Guantánamo Bay

A

It was a prison for terrorists. However, some were terrorists and some wasn’t. They gave cash rewards to anyone that could catch a terrorist

36
Q

china and wighur muslims

A

Genocide example, detained in camps.

37
Q

Daffur

A

Civil war. An organised campaign. People have been tortured raped and injured.