Status of employment Flashcards

1
Q

Introduction

A
s.230 + 230 (3) Employment Rights Act 1996
Health  and Safety at Work 1974
Working Time Regulations 1998
Income Tax Act 2003
Lister v Hedley Hall 2001
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

s 230 of Employment Rights Act 1996

A

‘An employee is a person who has entered into or works under a contract of employment’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

s 230(3) of Employment Rights Act 1996

A

‘A person who has entered into a contract of employment or any other contract providing a service or any work for another part whose status is not by virtue of the contract that of a client or a customer.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Same protection to employees and independent contractors

A

Work and Safety at Work 1974

Working Time Regulations 1998

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Different protection

A

Income Tax Act 2003

Lister v Hedley Hall 2001

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Control test

A
Narich Pty Ltd v Pay-Roll Tax
Yewes v Noaks
Walker v Crystal Palace FC
White v Troutbeck
Hitchcock v Post Office
Ready Mixed Concrete v Minister of Pensions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

The more control an employer exercises upon an individual, the more likely it is that person is an employee

A

Narich Pty Ltd v Pay-roll tax

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

An individual is considered to be an employee under the Control test where the employer tells him what to do and how to do it

A

Yewens v Noaks + Walker v Crystal Palace FC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Integration Test

A

Lord Denning in Stevenson, Henderson v Macdonald

Whittaker v Minister of Pensions and National Insurance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

‘under a contract of service, a man is employment as part of the business and his work is done as an integral part of the business.’

A

Lord Denning in Stevenson, Jordan, Harrison v Macdonald & Evans

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The employee has to perform certain duties - common sense test, but vague

A

Whittaker v Minister of Pensions and National Insurance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Lord Denning in Stevenson, Jordan Harrison V Macdonald&Evans

A

‘under a contract of service, a man is employment as part of the business and his work is done as an integral part of the business.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Economic Reality Test

A

Cooke J in Market Investigations v Minister for Social Security
Lee v Chung
Lane v Shire Roofing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Cooke J in Market Investigations v Minister for Social Security (1969)

A

‘the fundamental test to be applied is this: Is the person who engaged himself to perform these services performing them as a person in business on his own?’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Economic reality test - to be considered

A

-Financial Risk
-Own Money
-Own Tools
-Capacity to hire/fire people
Cooke J ‘No exhaustive list can be complied of the considerations which are relevant to the question.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Lane v Shire Roofing

A

Policy grounds while deciding upon the Economic Reality Test

17
Q

Multiple Test

A

McKenna J in Ready Mixed Concrete v Minister of Pensions and National Insurance (1968)
Carmichael v National Power

18
Q

McKenna J in Ready Mixed Concrete v Minister of Pensions and National Insurance (1968)

A

The courts need to look at the following:

  • whether the individual performs work for remuneration
  • whether the individual is under a sufficient control by the employer
  • whether any other factors of the contract of employment are present
19
Q

Carmichael v National Power plc

A

Relevant for Multiple test - approved by HoL
Consideration - work for remuneration
Casual workers - Lord Irvine

20
Q

Personal Service

A

Express&Echo v Tanton

MacFarlane v Glasgow City Council

21
Q

Express & Co v Tanton

A

The person cannot send a substitute

22
Q

MacFarlane v Glasgow City Council

A

The individual was able to send a substitute (gymnastic instructor from a public register)

23
Q

Mutuality of obligation

A

Carmichael v National Power plc

Cornwall v Prater 2006

24
Q

Cornwall v Prater 2006

A

The Supreme Court decided that the employer does not have to provide the individual with continuing work in order to consider him an employee.

25
Q

Intention of the Parties

A

Lord Denning MR in Massey v Crowne Life Insurance

Young v West

26
Q

Lord Denning Mr in Massey v Crowne Life Insurance

A

If the relationship is too ambiguous the courts can look at the intention of the parties and how they labelled the contract.

27
Q

Young v West

A

Before labeling a contract the courts shall consider the parties’ intention.

28
Q

Casual Workers

A

Lord Irvine in Carmichael v National Power plc

29
Q

Agency Workers

A

Dacas v Brook Street Bureau

Agency Workers Regulations 2010, Regulation 5

30
Q

Dacas v Brook Street Bureau

A

the courts need to consider whether there can be an implied contract from the individual straight to the employer

31
Q

Agency Workers Regulations 2010

A

Regulation 5 - after 12 weeks they have the same rights as a normal employee
The Agency Workers Regulations 2010 - does not apply to redundancy pay, sick pay&pensions, long service rewards.