Strengths And Weaknesses Flashcards

(49 cards)

1
Q

Give 2 strengths of independent measures designs.

A
  • different P’s = no order effects

* task only seen once = no demand characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Give 2 weaknesses of an independent measures designs.

A
  • more P’s needed

* individual differences distort results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Give 2 strengths of repeated measures designs.

A
  • individual differences don’t distort results

* fewer P’s needed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Give 2 weaknesses of repeated measures designs.

A
  • order effects (practice, fatigue, etc) = distort results

* task seen more that once = demand characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Give 2 strengths of matched participants.

A
  • task only seen once = less demand characteristics

* controls for individual differences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Give 2 weaknesses of matched participants.

A
  • similarity between pairs is limited

* time consuming and difficult to match

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Give 2 strengths of a lab experiment.

A
  • control over extraneous variables

* can be repeated = reliable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Give 2 weaknesses of a lab experiment.

A
  • low ecological validity

* demand characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Give 2 strengths of a field experiment.

A
  • normal situation = representative behaviour

* demand characteristics = no problem if P’s unaware of study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Give 2 weaknesses of a field experiment.

A
  • control over extraneous variables = difficult (can’t be sure of cause and effect)
  • if unaware of a study = ethical issues
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Give 2 strengths of a quasi-experiment.

A
  • allows us to study variables not ethically manipulated

* real life relevance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Give 2 weaknesses of quasi-experiments.

A
  • only possible when naturally occurring differences arise

* control over extraneous variables = difficult

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Give a strength of participant observations.

A

• real behaviour seen = validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Give 2 weaknesses of a participant observation.

A
  • observer bias

* if aware of study behaviour won’t be representative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Give 2 strengths of a non-participant observation.

A
  • remain objective

* covert = use equipment for detailed results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Give 2 weaknesses of a non-participant observation.

A
  • covert = ethical issues

* overt = alter behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Give a strength of an overt observation.

A

• aware so ethical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Give a weakness of an overt observation.

A

• responses may not be natural

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Give 2 strengths of a covert observation.

A
  • genuine behaviour

* non-P = equipment used for accurate recording

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Give 2 strengths of naturalistic observations.

A
  • normal environment = representative behaviour

* reactions observed in complex social setting when intervention = unethical/no co-operation

21
Q

Give 2 weaknesses of naturalistic observations.

A
  • Extraneous variables = not controlled

* validity compromised if observer suspected

22
Q

Give 2 strengths of controlled observations.

A
  • data recording = reliable

* extraneous variables controlled = valid

23
Q

Give 2 weaknesses of controlled observations.

A
  • P in unfamiliar environment = unrepresentative

* social situation created = limited

24
Q

Give 2 strengths of a structured observation.

A
  • pilot study = reliable

* operationalised variables = reliable / inter-rater reliability

25
Give 2 weaknesses of a structured observation.
* if not operationalised properly wrong recordings = less valid * predetermined categories = limited
26
Give 2 strengths of an unstructured observation.
* produces quantitative data | * no categories - any relevant behaviour recorded
27
Give 2 weaknesses of an unstructured observation.
* may miss behaviours - looking at everything | * inconsistent/subjective
28
Give a strength of an opportunity sample.
• quick & easy
29
Give a weakness of an opportunity sample.
• non-representative - biased
30
Give 2 strengths of a self-selected sample.
* easy | * P's committed
31
Give a weakness of a self- selected sample.
• non-representative as people who respond = similar
32
Give a strength of a snowball sample.
• easy as only find first few P's
33
Give a weakness of a snowball sample.
• non- representative = similar characteristics
34
Give a strength of a random sample.
• representative
35
Give a weakness of a random sample.
• hard to ensure all equally likely to be chosen - lack of info
36
Give a strength of a stratified sample.
• representative
37
Give a weakness of a stratified sample.
• difficult - all subgroups must be known
38
Give 2 strengths of quantitative data.
* collected using objective measures | * can be analysed using inferential statistics
39
Give 2 weaknesses of quantitative data.
• limits P's response
40
Give 2 strengths of qualitative data.
* highly valid as P's can express themselves | * less likely key/rare observations lost by simplifying data
41
Give 2 weaknesses of qualitative data.
* data from individual = hard to generalise | * interpretation may be biased = invalid
42
Give 2 strengths of questionnaires.
* time/cost effective | * more truthful than interview
43
Give 2 weaknesses of questionnaires.
* response bias = invalid | * quantitative data =limitations
44
Give 2 strengths of interviews.
* structured = easy to analyse | * semi-structured & unstructured = specific & detailed info
45
Give 2 weaknesses of interviews.
* structured = limited by fixed questions | * investigator bias = leading questions alter ways asked
46
Give 2 strengths of both questionnaires and interviews.
* structured questionnaire & interviews = repeatable | * produce quantitative and qualitative data
47
Give 2 weakness of both questionnaires and interviews.
* not everyone can be bothered so P may not be representative * P affected by biases like social desirability, leading questions, etc
48
Give 2 strengths of rating scales.
* easy for P to respond to = lots of data quickly -reliable | * quantitative = easy to analyse
49
Give 2 weaknesses of rating scales.
* response bias | * quantitative data = lacks detail