Strengths and weaknesses of revision methods Flashcards
(20 cards)
Quantitative methods
- Official and non-official statistics
- Structured interviews
- Questionnaires
- Content analysis
Qualitative methods
- Unstructured and semi-structured interviews
- Group and focus group interviews
- Ethnographic studies
Strengths of questionnaires
- Used for reaching larger and more representative samples as it can be given to hundreds of people
- Postal questionnaires are useful when the research population is geographically spread out
- They are cheaper and less time-consuming than other methods
Weaknesses of questionnaires
- Many people do not respond to questionnaires which can cause low response or no response and can undermine validity
- The questions can be biased or leading
- It is difficult to motivate people to return postal questionnaires
Strengths of structured interviews
- Positivists regard the method as scientific as it primarily produces qualitative data
- The use of closed questions creates lots of quantitative data which can be converted into charts
- Because of the interview schedule, structured interviews are quick and can allow for a larger sample
Weaknesses of structured interviews
- They are artificial and not in everyday life so may give false information as they are suspicious
- They are inflexible so sociologists cannot focus on other things if they hear something interesting
- Interpretivists believe they do not produce true data
Strengths of unstructured interviews
- They allow the researcher to build rapport which allows the participants to open up more which can enrich data
- Unstructured interviews allow the researcher to explain more about the research so they are useful for researching unknown groups
- They provide richer, more detailed data which is highly valid
Weaknesses of unstructured interviews
- They create a lot of data and require the researcher to be selective of what they publish
- The qualitative data is difficult to analyse as there are no pre-coded answers
- Studies that use unstructured interviews use less participants which undermines the representativeness to positivists
Strengths of semi-structured interviews
- Allows the researcher to explain the research and gain informed consent so is ethical
- Interpretivists see the data as valid as it allows the researcher to understand the world through the participant’s eyes
- Feminists argue this method gives women an opportunity to express how they really feel
Weaknesses of semi-structured interviews
- It is time consuming and expensive compared to other methods
- Not reliable as it is hard to replicate
- Positivists reject this see it as unscientific this method lacks objectivity and reliability and fails to produce representative data that can be generalised to the wider population
Strengths of observation
- The researcher sees things through the eyes of the group so the researcher experiences ‘verstehen’ or empathy which results in highly valid data
- Often what people say and what they do is different, people may lie or not be aware of their actions in interviews
- Observation can be supplemented with unstructured interviews to add to the validity
Weaknesses of observation
- Overt forms of research are subject to the researcher effect which may result in the group acting less naturally as the researcher is there which undermines the validity
- Some observers get too attached to the research group and show bias towards them reporting the data incorrectly and losing objectivity
- Covert observation is highly unethical
Strengths of ethnography
- Ethnography is usually long-term and in-depth as well as qualitative so produces lots of rich data
- It allows the researcher to achieve verstehen with the group they study which means they are more likely to open up
- The rapport built means it is high in validity
Weaknesses of ethnograpghy
• It usually is a study of a specific group and is therefore not representative of wider society
• It is subjective to the researcher’s opinions so could be biased
Positivists dislike the data as it is not reliable or analysable
Strengths of content analysis
- It is very cheap as all that is needed is media products
- It is a comparative analysis that can be longitudinal
- Quantitative content analysis is reliable as it can be repeated by other sociologists
Weaknesses of content analysis
- It can be very time-consuming
- It is very subjective as the categories depend on what the researcher thinks is important
- Sociologists have been accused of analysing text out of context
Strengths of official statistics
- They are often extremely easy and cheap to access as they are usually online
- They are often up-to-date so give sociologists an understanding of modern behaviour
- They often form the basis of hypotheses that motivate research
Weaknesses of official statistics
- They may not be representative of the wider population as they are collected by independent bodies
- They can be politically massaged to make a country look better
- They tell us very little about the human stories that underpin them so are disliked by interpretivists
Strengths of triangulation
- The methods cancel out the disadvantages and allow sociologists to guarantee validity
- Can reveal new information and hypotheses
- Provides a better understanding of the problem
Weaknesses of triangulation
- Can be expensive and time-consuming depending on the methods chosen
- The methods have to complement one another and cancel out the disadvantages
- More skills are needed to analyse the vast amounts of data