Studies Flashcards

(215 cards)

1
Q

Sharot year

A

2007

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Sharot aim

A

Determine the potential role of biological factors on flashbulb memories.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Sharot method

A

Quasi experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Sharot design

A

Independent Measures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Sharot sampling stratergy

A

Purposive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Sharot independent variable

A

Whether they were in Downtown, Midtown or Uptown Manhattan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Sharot dependent variable

A

Activation of the Amygdala

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Sharot procedure

A

Step 1: Participants were put in a fMRI.
Step 2: Participants were shown different words at the same time as the word “summer” or “September.”
Step 3: After fMRI, participants were asked to write a description of their personal memories. And rate their memories for vividness, detail, confidence in accuracy and arousal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Sharot Findings

A

The activation of the amygdala for the participants who were downtown was the higher when they recalled memories of the terrorist attack than when they recalled events from the proceeding summer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Sharot Conclusion

A

Close personal experience may be critical in engaging the neural mechanisms that produce the vivid memories characteristic of flashbulb memory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Sharot Evaluation Methodological Strengths

A

Quantifiable - measuring activation creates numerical
fMRI is immune to participant biases.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Sharot Evaluation Methodological Limitations

A

It could not establish a cause and effect relationship.
fMRI are sometimes critical for being artificial
Small sample size of 24, therefore limited sample to population generalisability.
Self-reported information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Sharot Evaluation Ethical Strengths

A

The participants were given informed consent
The fMRI is a non-invasive technique

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Sharot Evaluation Ethical Limitations

A

Causing them emotional distress - however it was not undue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Sharot key words/phrases (10)

A

Amygdala
Flashbulb Memories
Personal Consequentiality
Quasi Experiment
World Trade Centre
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)
Word Cues
Baseline Test
Geographic Proximity
Fight or Flight Response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Sharot title

A

et al.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Passamonti year

A

2012

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Passamonti title

A

et al.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Passamonti aim

A

The role serotonin has on the activity of the amygdala and pre-frontal cortex.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Passamonti method

A

True Lab Experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Passamonti design

A

Repeated Measures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Passamonti Sampling Stratergy

A

Self-Selected with Purposive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Passamonti Independent Variable

A

Whether they took a TDS or placebo

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Passamonti Dependent Variable

A

Activity between Amygdala and PFC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Passamonti Procedure
Step 1: Gave the participants a drink which lowers levels of tryptophan (naturally occurring amino acid which synthetised serotonin) or a placebo Step 2: Wait a few hours between time drinking and time doing measurements Step 3: fMRI machine they were shown angry, sad and neutral, were told to label these emotions
26
Passamonti Findings
The people who took the tryptophan depletion substance (TDS), there was a reduced connection between the amygdala and the Pre Frontal Cortex (PFC) - did not happen to control group or sad and neutral faces
27
Passamonti Conclusion
If we have reduced levels of serotonin, the prefrontal cortex and amygdala do not communicate when showed anger/threat
28
Passamonti Evaluation Methodoligical Strengths
Appropriate sample size of 30 healthy participants (calculate values of statistical significance) Placebo - participants and researchers were double blind to what condition they were in - reduces demand characteristics You cannot fake an fMRI Same people in the groups (practice affect) Causal relationship can be established.
29
Passamonti Evaluation Methodoligical Limitations
Low sample to population generalisability Lacks mundane validity
30
Passamonti Evaluation Ethical Strengths
Informed consent fMRI is a non-invasive technique
31
Passamonti Evaluation Ethical Limitations
Depleting serotonin can cause people to feel discomfort and distress Any manipulation of brain chemistry can cause ethical issues for many reasons, such as withdrawing consent and long term affects.
32
Passamonti key words/phrases (10)
Reactive Aggression Tryptophan Endogenous Agonist Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Frontal Lobe Amygdala Emoting Faces Fight or Flight Response Approach or Avoid Inhibition of Impulsive Reaction
33
Kendler year
2006
34
Kendler title
et al.
35
Kendler aim
The genetic heritability of depression
36
Kendler method
Correlational
37
Kendler design
Independent Measures
38
Kendler Sampling Stratergy
Purposive
39
Kendler independent variable
Sex and Zygosity
40
Kendler dependent variable
Concordance of Diagnosis
41
Kendler procedure
Step 1: Telephone interviews were carried out. Step 2: Depression was assessed at personal interview by modified DSM-IV (a statistical tool used to diagnose disorders) criteria Step 3: They were asked about their shared environment
42
Kendler findings
Model fitting indicated that the heritability of liability to major depression was significantly higher in women (42%) than men (29%) and the genetic risk factors for major depression were moderately correlated in men and women. No significant differences were seen in the etiologic roles of genetic and environmental factors in major depression in three cohorts spanning birth years 1900–1958.
43
Kendler conclusion
Heritability of major depression is higher in women than in men and that some genetic risk factors for major depression are sex-specific. In addition, the study confirms the level of heritability of major depression found in other studies, strengthening the reliability of European twin studies.
44
Kendler Evaluation Methodological Strengths
Very large sample size (15,493) 5 year period
45
Kendler Evaluation Methodological Limitations
Limited sample to population generalisability Correlational Self-reported data
46
Kendler key words/phrases (10)
Swedish Twin Registry Genetic Heritability Twin Study Major Depression Disorder (MDD) Zygosity (Monozygotic / Dizygotic) Telephone Interview DSM-IV (a statistical tool used to diagnose disorders) Shared Environment Individual Environment Correlational Study
47
Loftus and Palmer year
1974
48
Loftus and Palmer title
Loftus and Palmer
49
Loftus and Palmer aim
1. To investigate whether the use of leading questions would affect the estimation of speed. 2. To investigate if participants who had a high-speed estimate in the first part of an experiment would say that they had seen broken glass in the second part of the experiment.
50
Loftus and Palmer Method
True Lab Experiment
51
Loftus and Palmer Design
Independent Measures
52
Loftus and Palmer Sampling Stratergy
Convenience
53
Loftus and Palmer independent variable
i) Emotional intensity of the verb in the critical question ii) Leading glass question or not
54
Loftus and Palmer dependent variable
i) Estimated Speed ii) Whether they remember seeing broken glass
55
Loftus and Palmer procedure
1. Step 1: The participants were divided into five groups of nine students. Step 2: Seven films of traffic accidents were shown and the length of the films ranged from 5 to 30 seconds. The films were taken from driver's education films. Each participants watched all 7 films. Step 3: When the participants had watched a film they were asked to give an account of the accident they had seen and then they answered a questionnaire with different questions on the accident with one question being the critical question where they were asked to estimate the speed of the cars involved in the accident. Step 4: They were asked the same question but the critical question included different words. One group of participants were asked, "About how fast were the cars going when they hit each other?" The critical word "hit’" was replaced by ‘collided’, ‘bumped’ or ‘smashed’ or’ contacted’ in the other conditions. Followed the same steps as experiment 1, but with another question: "Did you see any broken glass?"
56
Loftus and Palmer Findings
1. The mean estimates of speed were highest in the ‘smashed’ condition (40.8 mph) and lowest in the ‘contacted’ group (31.8 mph). Smashed 40.8 mph Collided 39.3 mph Bumped 38.1 mph Hit 34.0 mph Contacted 31.8 mph 2. Smashed 10.46 mph Hit 8.00 mph In the ‘smashed’ condition 16 participants said yes to having seen broken glass compared to 7 in the ‘hit’ condition. 6 participants in the control condition answered ‘yes’ to the question. 34 participants in the ‘smashed’ condition answered ‘no’ to the question compared to 43 in the ‘hit’ condition. Although most of the participants accurately reported no broken glass, more of the participants in the ‘smashed’ condition said they saw broken glass. Responses based on the did you see any broken glass?: Response: yes. Smashed: 16. Hit: 7. Control 6. Response: no. Smashed: 34. Hit: 43. Control 44.
57
Loftus and Palmer Conclusion
Participants' memory of an accident could be changed by using suggestive questions.
58
Loftus and Palmer Evaluation Methodological Strengths
Large sample size (1. 45 students 2. 150) Decoy questions Cause and effect relationship can be established
59
Loftus and Palmer Evaluation Methodological Limitations
Low ecological validity Students were participants (they likely did not have much experience with driving)
60
Loftus and Palmer key words/phrases (10)
Reconstructive Memory Eyewitness Testimony Leading Questions Misleading Post-Event Information Response Bias Schema Processing Verb Intensity Speed Estimation Low Ecological Validity Independent Measures Design
61
Yuille and Cutshall year
1986
62
Yuille and Cutshall title
Yuille and Cutshall
63
Yuille and Cutshall aim
To determine whether leading questions would affect memory of eyewitnesses at a real crime scene.
64
Yuille and Cutshall method
Experiment
65
Yuille and Cutshall design
Independent Measures
66
Yuille and Cutshall sampling stratergy
Purposive
67
Yuille and Cutshall independent variable
i) Leading headlight question or not ii) Leading panel question or not
68
Yuille and Cutshall dependent variable
i) Whether they remember seeing a broken headlight ii) Whether they remember seeing a yellow panel
69
Yuille and Cutshall Procedure
Step 1: The participants gave an account of the incident, four months after the incident (21 people witnessed 13 agreed to participate). Step 2: They were asked question. Two leading questions were asked. Step 3: Half the group was asked if they saw "a" broken headlight on the getaway car. The other half were asked if they saw "the" broken headlight. In fact, there was no broken headlight. Step 4: The second question asked half the group if they saw "the" yellow panel on the car, and the other half was asked if they saw "a" yellow panel on the car (the panel was actually blue). Step 5: They were also asked to rate their stress on the day of the event on a seven-point scale.
70
Yuille and Cutshall findings
It was found that eyewitnesses were actually very reliable. They recalled a large amount of accurate detail that could be confirmed by the original police reports. They also did not make errors as a result of the leading questions. 10 out of 13 of them said there was no broken headlight or yellow quarter panel, or that they had not noticed those particular details. The researchers found that the accuracy of the witnesses compared to the original police reports was between 79% and 84%. The witnesses reported that they didn't remember feeling afraid during the incident, but they did report having an "adrenaline rush."
71
Yuille and Cutshall conclusion
The higher recall accuracy could be due to the emotional involvement.
72
Yuille and Cutshall evaluation methodological strengths
Real event (authenticity) There was archival evidence (police records of the original testimonies) to confirm the accuracy of the memories.
73
Yuille and Cutshall evaluation methodological limitations
It cannot be replicated The quantification of the qualitative responses from the participants is problematic and may be open to researcher bias.
74
Yuille and Cutshall key words/phrases (10)
Gun Store Robbery Eyewitness Testimony Flashbulb Memory Leading Questions Stress Misleading Post-Event Information Fight or Flight Response True Experiment with Naturalistic Elements Purposive Sample Not Replicable
75
Draganski year
2004
76
Draganski title
et al.
77
Draganski aim
To see whether learning a new skill would have an effect on the brains of the participants.
78
Draganski method
True field experiment
79
Draganski design
Independent measures
80
Draganski sampling stratergy
Self-selected with purposive
81
Draganski independent variable
Whether they learned to juggle or not
82
Draganski dependent variable
Mass of Grey Matter in the Mid Temporal Lobe
83
Draganski procedure
Step 1: Brain scan 1 (baseline) - voxel based morphometry and pixel counting Step 2: Learn to juggle or not learn to juggle Step 3: Brain scan 2 - right after juggling was mastered - voxel based morphometry and pixel counting Step 4: Brain scan 3 - 3 months after juggling was mastered, where in this time the participants were forbidden to juggle - voxel based morphometry and pixel counting Step 5: Compare grey matter in the mid-temporal lobe between scans
84
Draganski findings
The grey matter in the mid-temporal lobe of the juggling group was the highest in brain scan 2 and lowest in brain scan 1. The grey matter in the mid-temporal lobe of the control group remained the same.
85
Draganski conclusion
Learning a new skill increases the grey matter in the brain. The rate of long term potentiation is greater than the rate of neural pruning.
86
Draganski evaluation methodological strengths
No demand characteristics from MRI Quantified the scans with voxel based morphometry Pre-test, post-test method
87
Draganski evaluation methodological limitations
Small sample size (24) - limited generalisability Low internal validity - lots of potential for confounding variables
88
Draganski evaluation ethical strengths
Informed consent MRI is a non-invasive procedure
89
Draganski evaluation ethical limitations
Participants may have been stressed at the task of mastering a skill.
90
Draganski key words/phrases (10)
Dendritic Branching Neural Pruning Long Term Potentiation Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) True Field Experiment Hebb's Theory Baseline Test Voxel-Based Morphometry (VBM) Mid-Temporal Lobe Three-Ball Cascade
91
Radke year
2015
92
Radke title
et al.
93
Radke aim
Investigate the role of testosterone on aggression
94
Radke method
True lab experiment
95
Radke design
Independent Measures
96
Radke sampling stratergy
Purposive
97
Radke independent variable
Whether they took Testosterone or placebo
98
Radke dependent variable
Activation of the Amygdala
99
Radke procedure
Step 1: They (54 healthy females) took a placebo or extra testosterone (0.5mg) on a placebo, then waited 4-5 hours. Step 2: They were placed in the fMRI and different faces appeared. Step 3: The participants had to "approach" or "avoid" (make the faces bigger or smaller) with a joystick
100
Radke findings
Testosterone showed strongest effect on amygdala activity when approaching socially threatening (angry) faces.
101
Radke conclusion
Testosterone helps to prepare the body to fight when we are motivated to deal with a social threat by increasing activity in the amygdala. Increased amygdala activity could increase negative emotions like anger and trigger a "fight" response to the threat. This could explain the relationship that has been found between testosterone and aggression.
102
Radke evaluation methodological strengths
fMRI is reliable Causal relationship
103
Radke evaluation methodological limitations
Lacks mundane realism Reductionist
104
Radke key words/phrases (10)
Testosterone Amygdala Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Increase / Decrease Image Size Emoting Faces Fight or Flight Response Approach or Avoid Social Threat Pre-Frontal Cortex (PFC) Physical Readiness
105
Englich and Mussweiler year
2001
106
Englich and Mussweiler title
Englich and Mussweiler
107
Englich and Mussweiler aim
To test if the sentence length requested by a prosecutor would unduly influence the decision made by a judge
108
Englich and Mussweiler method
True lab experiment
109
Englich and Mussweiler design
Independent measures
110
Englich and Mussweiler sampling stratergy
Purposive
111
Englich and Mussweiler independent variable
Whether the recommended sentence was a High or Low Anchor
112
Englich and Mussweiler dependent variable
Recommended Sentence for the guilty defendant
113
Englich and Mussweiler procedure
Step 1: The participants were given a case of alleged rape. Step 2: Then the case materials were tested on a group of 24 senior law students – this served as a pilot study. The average recommended prison term suggested by the law students was 17.21 months. This was then used as a basis for determining the anchors. Step 3: Participants were given the case materials along with copies of the penal code. They were asked to read through the materials and form an opinion about the case. Step 4: After they had formed an opinion about the case (about 15 minutes), they were given a questionnaire. Step 5: Half of the participants were told that the prosecutor demanded a 34-month sentence; while the other half were told that he demanded a 2-month sentence. Step 6: They were then asked the following questions: Do you think that the sentence was too low, adequate or too high? What sentence would you recommend? How certain are you about your sentencing decision? (a scale of 1 – 9) How realistic do you think this case is? (a scale of 1 – 9)
114
Englich and Mussweiler findings
The average rating for the realistic nature of the case was 7.17, with a standard deviation of 1.3. The judges' certainty about their responses, however, were not as strong, with an average rating of 4.53 and a standard deviation of 2.29. When presented with a low anchor of two months, the average sentence was 18.78 months, with a standard deviation of 9.11. in the high anchor condition of 34 months, the average sentence was 28.70 months, with a standard deviation of 6.53.
115
Englich and Mussweiler conclusion
The smaller anchor leads to a shorter, and closer to recommended, sentence. A larger anchor leads to a longer sentence.
116
Englich and Mussweiler evaluation methodological strengths
Cause and effect relationship can be established. The use of the pilot group helped to establish reasonable anchors. The low scores on the judges' sense of confidence indicate that they may have been aware that their judgment was being influenced by other factors.
117
Englich and Mussweiler evaluation methodological limitations
Small sample size (24 in pilot study and 19 in second study) Very short time to review case material
118
Englich and Mussweiler key words/phrases (10)
Anchoring Bias Dual Processing Model Systems 1 and 2 Rational Thinking (Controlled) Intuitive Thinking (Automatic) Independent Measures Design Trial Judges Sentence Length Demands Participant Variability Pilot Study
119
Peterson and Peterson year
1959
120
Peterson and Peterson title
Peterson and Peterson
121
Peterson and Peterson aim
To investigate the duration of short-term memory.
122
Peterson and Peterson method
True Lab Experiment
123
Peterson and Peterson design
Repeated Measures
124
Peterson and Peterson sampling stratergy
Convenience
125
Peterson and Peterson independent variable
Time delay before recall
126
Peterson and Peterson dependent variable
Recall Accuracy of Trigrams
127
Peterson and Peterson procedure
Step 1: The student sat at a table with the experimenter faced the same direction on the student's right. There was a shield between the two. In front of the student was two lights on a black box, Step 2: The students were presented with trigrams one at a time, and had to be recalled after intervals of 3,6,9,12,15 or 18 seconds. Step 3: After hearing a trigram, participants were asked to count backward in threes or fours from a specified random digit number until they saw a red light appear (then they recalled the trigram).
128
Peterson and Peterson findings
After 3 seconds 80% of the trigrams were recalled correctly. After 6 seconds this fell to 50%. After 18 seconds less than 10% of the trigrams were recalled correctly.
129
Peterson and Peterson conclusion
Short-term memory has a limited duration (of about 18 seconds) when rehearsal is prevented.
130
Peterson and Peterson evaluation methodological strengths
Comparing conditions not people
131
Peterson and Peterson evaluation methodological limitations
Small sample size low (24) sample to population generalisability
132
Peterson and Peterson key words/terms (9)
Short-Term Memory Trigram Suspension of Rehearsal Verbal Stimulation Filler Task Consonant Syllables Repeated Measures Opportunity Sampling Controlled Setting
133
Bartlett year
1932
134
Bartlett title
Bartlett
135
Bartlett aim
To investigate how the memory of a story is affected by previous knowledge.
136
Bartlett method
"Experiment"
137
Bartlett design
Independent Measures
138
Bartlett sampling stratergy
Convenience and purposive
139
Bartlett independent variable
The participants' cultural background / schema
140
Bartlett dependent variable
Recall Accuracy of The War of the Ghosts
141
Bartlett procedure
Step 1: Bartlett told participants a Native American legend called The War of the Ghosts Step 2: Bartlett allocated the participants to one of two conditions: one group was asked to use repeated reproduction, where participants heard the story and were told to reproduce it after a short time and then to do so again repeatedly over a period of days, weeks, months or years. The second group was told to use serial reproduction, in which they had to recall the story and repeat it to another person.
142
Bartlett findings
Bartlett found that there was no significant difference between the way that the groups recalled the story. Bartlett found that participants in both conditions changed the story as they tried to remember it - a process called distortion. Bartlett found that there were three patterns of distortion that took place. Assimilation: The story became more consistent with the participants’ own cultural expectations - that is, details were unconsciously changed to fit the norms of British culture. Levelling: The story also became shorter with each retelling as participants omitted information which was seen as not important. Sharpening: Participants also tended to change the order of the story in order to make sense of it using terms more familiar to the culture of the participants. They also added detail and/or emotions. The participants overall remembered the main themes in the story but changed the unfamiliar elements to match their own cultural expectations so that the story remained a coherent whole although changed.
143
Bartlett conclusion
Bartlett's study indicates that remembering is not a passive but rather an active process, where information is retrieved and changed to fit into existing schemas. This is done in order to create meaning in the incoming information.
144
Bartlett evaluation methodological limitations
Lacks experimental design No control group Limited sample to population generalisability No causal link Did not use standardised instructions
145
Bartlett key words/terms (10)
War of the Ghosts Cultural Schema Repeated Reproduction Serial Reproduction Assimilation Levelling Sharpening Reconstructive Memory Quasi Experiment Distortion
146
Baddeley year
1975
147
Baddeley title
et al.
148
Baddeley aim
To see if people could remember more short words than long words in a serial recall test
149
Baddeley method
True Lab Experiment
150
Baddeley
Independent/Repeated Measures
151
Baddeley sampling stratergy
Convenience
152
Baddeley independent variable
Whether they engaged articulatory suppression or were silent
153
Baddeley dependent variable
Serial Recall Accuracy of one- and five-syllable words
154
Baddeley procedure
Step 1: EXPERIMENT 7 Step 2: Familiarization – Participants were introduced to two sets of words: One-syllable words (short words, Five-syllable words (long words) Step 3: Word Lists Created – Two pools of 10 words each (one for short words, one for long words) were created. Step 4: Random Selection of Words – From each pool, 16 five-word lists were made by sampling words at random without replacement. Step 5: Experimental Conditions – Participants were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: Silent recall (normal memory recall). Articulatory suppression (repeating an irrelevant sound while trying to remember words). Step 6: Memory Task – Participants had to recall the words in order (serial recall task). Step 7: Data Collection – The dependent variable (DV) was serial recall accuracy for both short and long words. Step 8: Comparison of Results – The researchers compared recall performance between the two conditions (silent vs. articulatory suppression).
155
Baddeley findings
* Word Length Effect Observed - Participants remembered more short words (one-syllable) compared to long words (five-syllable). - This supports the idea that short-term memory is limited by time, not just capacity—you can rehearse short words faster * Articulatory Suppression Eliminated the Word Length Effect - When participants were asked to repeat an irrelevant sound (articulatory suppression condition), the word length effect disappeared. This means they struggled to rehearse the words mentally, leading to similar recall levels for short and long words.
156
Baddeley conclusion
* Short-term memory relies on phonological (speech-based) coding. * The word length effect happens because people rehearse words subvocal (in their heads), but this is disrupted when articulatory suppression is used. * Supports the Phonological Loop in Baddeley & Hitch’s Working Memory Model (WMM), where: - Phonological Store → Holds verbal info temporarily. Articulatory Control Process → Rehearses the info to keep it active.
157
Baddeley evaluation methodological limitations
Very low sample size (12)
158
Baddeley key words/terms (9)
Short-Term Memory Modality Specific Phonological Loop Visuospatial Sketchpad Silent Condition Articulatory Suppression Word Length Effect Encoding Working Memory Capacity
159
Zhou year
2014
160
Zhou title
et al.
161
Zhou aim
The extent to Androstadienone (AND) and Estratetraenol (EST) would affect signalling the point light walker.
162
Zhou method
True Lab Experiment
163
Zhou design
Repeated measures
164
Zhou sampling stratergy
Purposive
165
Zhou independent variable
Whether they took AND, EST, or placebo
166
Zhou dependent variable
Sex Identification of the Point Light Walker
167
Zhou procedure
Step 1: Cotton ball under nose Step 2: Participants were presented a point-light walker task (PLW), a set of dots that move in a way which represents the properties of human motion. Step 3: The participants were asked to observe the stick figure in motion and to identify sex. Step 4: They did the same task for 3 consecutive days, never did different conditions on the same day.
168
Zhou findings
Heterosexual females and gay males were exposed to AND, they had a higher rate of identifying the stick figure as "masculine" than the control group. AND had no significant effect on heterosexual men or lesbian women. By contrast, smelling EST systematically biases heterosexual males toward perceiving the walkers as more feminine. The effect was not statistically significant in bisexual and lesbian women.
169
Zhou conclusion
It appears that AND and EST may have some effect on human sexual behaviour.
170
Zhou evaluation methodological strengths
True lab experiment Cause and effect relationship Counterbalancing - no order effects
171
Zhou evaluation methodological limitations
Many confounding variables Sex identification Concentration of steroids much greater than naturally occurring Hare replication similar study with a different conclusion
172
Zhou (10)
Androstadienone (AND) Estratetraenol (EST) Sympathetic Arousal Hypothalamus Sexual Orientation Point-Light Walker Task Clove Oil Counterbalancing Sex Identification True Experiment
173
Curtis year
2004
174
Curtis
et al.
175
Curtis aim
To investigate patterns in disgust responses.
176
Curtis method
Survey
177
Curtis design
Independent Measures
178
Curtis sampling stratergy
Self-selected
179
Curtis independent variable
Whether the images were disease-salient or disease-irrelevant
180
Curtis dependent variable
Rating of Disgust
181
Curtis procedure
Step 1: Online survey of 40000 participants from 165 different countries. Participants were asked their age, sex, country etc. Step 2: Participants were shown 20 images, 1 by 1 on separate screen and rate them 1-5. These were 7 pairs of diseased and non-diseased photos. Step 3: For each image, they were asked to rank their level of disgust.
182
Curtis findings
The disgust reaction was strongest regarding those images which threaten one’s immune system. It decreased with age, and disgust reactions were higher in women than in men.
183
Curtis conclusion
Disgust is an adaptation designed to prevent the acquisition of infectious diseases. This research also supports the idea of disgust as a key to successful reproduction.
184
Curtis evaluation methodological strengths
Large number of participants 77000 (40000) decreases variability. Findings support evolutionary theory, that disgust acts as our biological mechanism to keep us away from threats to our immune system.
185
Curtis evaluation methodological limitations
Hard to rank disgust; doing so is not consistent from participant to participant. Survey was the research method, therefore a limitation includes accuracy of participants' response. As this was self-report data, it is subject to demand characteristics.
186
Curtis evaluation ethical limitations
The exposure to confronting and disgusting images raises the consideration around protection from harm. Some participants may have found this a disturbing task.
187
Curtis key terms/phrases (10)
Online Survey Disease-Salient Stimuli Immune System Disgust (Primary Emotion) Natural Selection Genetic Reproduction Environmental Adaptation Risk of Disease Disgust Sensitivity Sex Differences
188
Tversky and Kahneman year
1974
189
Tversky and Kahneman title
Tversky and Kahneman
190
Tversky and Kahneman aim
To test the influence of the anchoring bias on decision-making
191
Tversky and Kahneman method
True Lab Experiment
192
Tversky and Kahneman design
Independent measures
193
Tversky and Kahneman sampling stratergy
Convenience
194
Tversky and Kahneman independent variable
Whether the sequence began with a High or Low Anchor
195
Tversky and Kahneman dependent variable
Estimated Product to the Mathematical Problem
196
Tversky and Kahneman procedure
Step 1: Participants in the “ascending condition” were asked to quickly estimate the value of 1 X 2 X 3 X 4 X 5 X 6 X 7 X 8 in five seconds. Step 2: Those in the “descending condition” were asked to quickly estimate the value of 8 X 7 X 6 X 5 X 4 X 3 X 2 X 1.
197
Tversky and Kahneman findings
The researchers found that the median for the ascending group was 512; the median for the descending group was 2250. The actual value is 40320.
198
Tversky and Kahneman conclusion
The anchor was the cause of the higher (or lower) estimates by the students.
199
Tversky and Kahneman evaluation methodological strengths
95 participants High internal validity
200
Tversky and Kahneman evaluation methodological limitations
Low ecological validity
201
Tversky and Kahneman key words/phrases (10)
Dual Processing Model Systems 1 and 2 Rational Thinking (Controlled) Intuitive Thinking (Automatic) Heuristics Cognitive Miser Anchoring Bias Ascending and Descending Conditions Independent Measures Design Median Value
202
Bransford and Johnson year
1972
203
Bransford and Johnson title
Bransford and Johnson
204
Bransford and Johnson aim
To determine whether schema activation would result in better understanding and recall of an ambiguous text.
205
Bransford and Johnson method
True lab experiment
206
Bransford and Johnson design
Independent measures
207
Bransford and Johnson sampling stratergy
Convenience/Self-Selected
208
Bransford and Johnson independent variable
Whether context was provided, what form it took, and when it was given
209
Bransford and Johnson dependent variable
Recall Accuracy of Idea Units from an Unfamiliar Passage
210
Bransford and Johnson procedure
Step 1: The participants were allocated to one of five conditions - no context, no context (read passage twice), context after, partial context, context before. Step 2: All participants were told that they were going to hear a tape-recorded passage. They were told that they would later be asked to recall the passage as accurately as possible. Step 3: All participants were tested at the same time, but they had different answer booklets. Step 4: Participants were given five minutes for recall.
211
Bransford and Johnson findings
The two groups with the lowest recall were no context read once, and no context after. Next was the group with no context read twice. Next was partial context. The best was context in advance. Understanding was also shown to be affected.
212
Bransford and Johnson conclusion
The researchers concluded that "prior knowledge of a situation does not guarantee its usefulness for comprehension. In order for prior knowledge to aid comprehension, it must become an activated semantic context."
213
Bransford and Johnson evaluation methodological strengths
52 participants High internal validity Cause and effect can be established
214
Bransford and Johnson evaluation methodological limitations
Lacks ecological validity It is not possible to know that an actual "laundry schema" was active while listening to the text.
215
Bransford and Johnson key words/terms (10)
Contextual Prerequisites Idea Units Independent Measures Design Laundry Study Pictorial Context Written Context Comprehension Artificial Task Low Ecological Validity Highly Replicable