Study Designs Beyond RCTs Flashcards

1
Q

observational studies

A

researcher is documenting a natural occurring relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

observational studies can be

A

descriptive or analytical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

interventional studies

A

researcher actively performs an intervention in some or all participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

descriptive studies

A

describing data on one or more characteristics of a group
does not focus on reasons for occurrence
focus on novel/unusual signs, symptoms or events

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

analytical studies

A

tests a hypothesis and establishes causal relationships between two variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

prospective studies

A

the outcome has not occurred when the study starts
participants followed over a period of time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

retrospective studies

A

the outcome has already occurred in each individual by the time they are enrolled in the study
data collected from records

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what type of study:

investigator assigns exposure?

when they don’t?

A

yes - experimental

no - observational

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what type of study:

if the study describes the characteristics of a sample?

A

yes - descriptive study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what type of study:

if the study analyzes relationship between 2 variables?

A

analytical study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

for observational trials:

sampling determined based on outcome?

A

case control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

for observational trials:

sampling determined based on exposure?

A

cohort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

for observational trials:

sampling without regard to outcome/exposure?

A

cross sectional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

which study is the first step into a new area of research?

A

descriptive studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

methods of collecting descriptive studies

A

surveys
cross sectional studies
observation
case report
case series

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

strengths of descriptive studies

A

quick and cheap
allows for analysis of facts, in depth understanding
both qualitative and quantitative methods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

weaknesses of descriptive studies

A

cannot use statistical tools
observer effect
bias
cannot establish causative relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

descriptive statistics

A

measures of central tendency
measures of dispersion
measures of frequency distribution
tables and charts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

causal inference

A

drawing conclusion that a specific treatment was the cause of the effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

observational analytical trials only establish _______________ while interventional analytical trials only establish _________________

A

association

causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

case report observes ______________ while case series observes _________________

A

a single person

multiple patients

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

advantages of case report/series

A

detailed
identify undocumented rare/new diseases or adverse effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

disadvantages of case report/series

A

bias
no information on disease frequency
small number of patients

24
Q

cross sectional studies

A

identify prevalence of exposure/outcome at a snapshot in time
retrospective and observational

25
survey research
cross sectional study study the prevalence, distribution, and relationships of sociologic and psychological variables
26
observational analytical studies
no randomization analyze associations between exposures and outcomes by observing subjects in real world settings
27
theory
a set of statements/principles devised to explain group of facts/phenomena
28
types of analytical observational studies
cohort cross sectional case control
29
case control studies
association between disease states and previous exposure to risk factors
30
appropriate use for case control studies
risk factors for rare conditions contact trace original point in outbreak
31
case control studies cannot establish a
casual relationship
32
cohort studies
group of subjects, initially free of study outcomes, followed over time from an exposure to one or more outcomes
33
cohort studies determine association between
risk factors and subsequent development of disease states
34
cohort studies are useful in investigation of
multiple outcomes after a single exposure and in study of rare exposures
35
prospective cohort studies
subjects are followed prospectively to assess for development of disease
36
advantages of prospective cohort studies
strongest type of observational study evaluate temporal relationship better control of data collection
37
disadvantages of prospective cohort studies
cannot establish casual relationship expensive loss to follow up
38
retrospective cohort studies
association of risk factors and subsequent development of disease states
39
advantages of retrospective cohort studies
evaluate temporal relationship quick and cheap can calculate incidence and risk real world evidence
40
Narrative review
summary of evidence on specific topic, qualitative "review articles"
41
Systematic review
answers a defined research question summarize data from multiple studies, qualitative
42
Meta-analysis
statistical methods that aggregate results of multiple studies, quantitative
43
Meta-analysis types
pair wise: compare intervention to control (direct) network: multiple interventions, but one common (indirect)
44
Publication bias
positive results more likely to be published
45
Language bias
negative results less likely to be published in english
46
Citation bias
positive results cited more frequently
47
Clinical heterogeneity
variability in participants, interventions and outcomes
48
Methodological heterogeneity
variability in study design, outcome measurement tools and risk of bias
49
Statistical heterogeneity
variability in intervention effects being evaluated across different studies
50
Poor overlap of confidence intervals indicates _____
statistical heterogeneity
51
Forest Plot
visual of effect estimates and CIs for individual studies and meta-analyses area of block = weight
52
PRISMA statement
evidence-based min set of items for reporting in systemic and meta-analyses
53
PRISMA Flow diagram
describes how investigators went from all records identified via search strategy to most relevant studies
54
% of variability
<25% = low inconsistency 50-75% = moderate >75% = high inconsistency
55
Limitations of SLRs and meta-analyses
one number cannot summarize entire field file drawer problem important studies ignored