SU 2 - Independence & Objectivity Flashcards
(48 cards)
A reporting structure where the governing authority sets the direction and approve the policies of the internal auditing activity. This structure provides the ultimate source of independence and authority.
Functional Reporting
An unbiased mental attitude that allows internal auditors to perform engagements in such a manner that they believe in their work product and that no significant quality compromises are made. It requires that internal auditors do not subordinate their judgment on audit matters to others.
Objectivity
The freedom from conditions that threaten the ability of the internal audit activity to carry out internal audit responsibilities in an unbiased manner.
Independence
A reporting structure where the administrative unit facilitates the day-to-day operations of the internal audit activity.
Administrative reporting
Any relationship that is or appears to be not in the best interest of the organization; would prejudice an individual’s ability to perform his or her duties and responsibilities objectively.
Conflict of interest
Which statement is true?
a) Personal conflicts of interest, scope limitations, and restricted access to records may impair objectivity but not independence.
b) Personal conflicts of interest, scope limitations, and restricted access to records will not impair independence or objectivity.
c) Personal conflicts of interest, scope limitations, and restricted access to records may impair independence but not objectivity.
d) Personal conflicts of interest, scope limitations, and restricted access to records may impair both independence and objectivity.
d) Personal conflicts of interest, scope limitations, and restricted access to records may impair both independence and objectivity.
Rationale
Impairment to organizational independence and individual objectivity may include personal conflict of interest, scope limitations, and restricted access to records.
Which is acceptable for an internal auditor to do while still maintaining his or her professional judgment?
a) Attending an employee event at a potential vendor
b) Participating in a birthday celebration within the department being reviewed
c) Sitting at a vendor’s table at a charitable event honoring the auditor’s company
d) Accepting a lunch invitation and allowing someone to buy lunch at an expensive restaurant
b) Participating in a birthday celebration within the department being reviewed
Rationale
An internal auditor must maintain objectivity in fact and in appearance. Accepting a lunch invitation or allowing someone to buy lunch should not compromise objectivity, but consider what is “reasonable” versus what could be perceived as a conflict of interest. In this case, lunch at an expensive restaurant may be perceived to be a problem. Attending an employee event at a potential vendor or sitting at a vendor’s table at a charitable event honoring the auditor’s company can likewise be perceived as lack of objectivity.
Which of the following is most likely to enable the internal audit activity to carry out its responsibilities in an unbiased manner?
a) The chief audit executive has direct and unrestricted access to senior management and the board.
b) The chief audit executive reports functionally to the chief executive officer.
c) The chief audit executive self-assesses against a competency framework or benchmark.
d) The chief audit executive reports administratively to the board.
a) The chief audit executive has direct and unrestricted access to senior management and the board.
Rationale
The IPPF Glossary defines independence is “the freedom from conditions that threaten the ability of the internal audit activity to carry out internal responsibilities in an unbiased manner.
” The interpretation to Standard 1100: Independence and Objectivity states: “To achieve the degree of independence necessary to effectively carry out the responsibilities of the internal audit activity, the chief audit executive has direct and unrestricted access to senior management and the board.”
Self-assessments demonstrate an individual internal auditor’s continuing professional development (IG 1230: Continuing Professional Development).
The IIA recommends that the chief audit executive report functionally to the board and administratively to the chief executive officer (IG 1100: Independence and Objectivity).
You have been asked to be a member of a peer review team. In assessing the independence of the internal audit department being reviewed, you should consider which factor?
a) Scope and depth of organizational objectives for the audit areas under review
b) Degree to which auditors assume consulting responsibilities
c) Education and experience considered necessary when filling vacant audit staff positions
d) Access to and frequency of communications with the board of directors or the audit committee
d) Access to and frequency of communications with the board of directors or the audit committee
Rationale
Education and experience are related to skill, not independence. Communication and assumption of operating duties (not consulting duties) are related to independence. The scope and depth of the audit objectives also reflect on the department’s independence (not the objectives of the audit areas under review).
Which of the following best demonstrates conformance with objectivity?
a) Performance evaluation and compensation processes.
b) Records of a recruitment and training strategy, and job descriptions.
c) Competency assessments of the internal audit activity.
d) Internal audit workpaper templates and engagement plans.
a) Performance evaluation and compensation processes.
Rationale
It is widely understood that compensation practices can significantly affect objectivity. Competency assessments, workpaper templates and engagement plans, and records of recruitment better demonstrate conformance with proficiency and due professional care, and would be secondary considerations for objectivity.
Which of the following activities undertaken by the internal auditor might be in conflict with the standard of independence?
a) Acting as external audit liaison
b) Acting as an ethics advocate
c) Acting as a product development temporary project manager
d) Acting as a risk management consultant
c) Acting as a product development temporary project manager
Rationale
Some activities, such as acting as the leader of a project, may conflict with the independence attribute of the internal audit activity. The auditor can be a consultant to the project but should not participate as project manager. The other options do not conflict with the independence of the internal audit activity.
Which of the following management requests would be within the normal audit scope?
a) Do a make-or-buy decision analysis to determine whether the company should subcontract for part of its manufacturing versus adding capacity; report the recommendation to management for approval.
b) Analyze financing alternatives and present the alternatives to the audit committee.
c) Perform an independent evaluation of management’s planning process as a basis for making recommendations.
d) Talk with banks to identify financing alternatives, and negotiate contract alternatives that would be presented to management for evaluation.
c) Perform an independent evaluation of management’s planning process as a basis for making recommendations.
Rationale
The planning process is part of the management control system, and its evaluation is part of the normal scope of the auditor’s activities. Talking with banks and make-or-buy decisions are management, not audit, functions. They have the potential to impair the auditor’s independence. The auditor should concentrate on management’s planning and evaluation process and report on that process to the audit committee.
The board’s involvement in which of the following demonstrates that organizational independence is effectively achieved?
a) Reviewing and approving the risk-based audit plan.
b) Reviewing and approving the engagement report.
c) Reviewing and approving the engagement work program.
d) Reviewing and approving the engagement workpapers.
a) Reviewing and approving the risk-based audit plan.
Rationale
The board’s involvement in approving the risk-based audit plan is an example of functional reporting to the board, thereby contributing to organizational independence. Review and approval of the engagement work program, workpapers, and engagement report are duties of the chief audit executive, and can help to demonstrate objectivity, but not independence.
A new senior auditor was director of risk management in the organization prior to joining the internal audit department. After joining the internal audit department, when can the senior auditor participate in a risk management consulting engagement?
a) In one year.
b) In six months.
c) Immediately.
d) In ninety days.
c) Immediately.
Rationale
Standard 1130.A3 states that objectivity is presumed to be impaired if internal auditors provide assurance services for an activity for which they had responsibility within the previous year. The restriction does not apply to consulting services.
Which of the following actions would be a violation of auditor independence?
a) Reviewing a purchasing agent’s contract drafts prior to their execution
b) Reducing the scope of an engagement due to budget restrictions
c) Participating on a task force that recommends standards of control for a new distribution system
d) Continuing on an audit assignment at a division for which the auditor will soon be responsible as the result of a promotion
d) Continuing on an audit assignment at a division for which the auditor will soon be responsible as the result of a promotion
Rationale
An auditor who has been promoted to an operating department should not continue on an audit of that department. If the chief audit executive determines that impairment exists or may be inferred, he or she needs to reassign the auditor.
Which of the following statements is true?
a) The internal audit activity and internal auditors must be independent and objective.
b) The internal audit activity must be independent, and internal auditors must be objective.
c) The internal audit activity must be objective, and internal auditors must be independent.
d) The internal audit activity must be independent, internal auditors must be independent and objective.
b) The internal audit activity must be independent, and internal auditors must be objective.
Rationale
Independence relates to the internal audit activity, objectivity relates to internal auditors.
An internal auditor has been assigned to an assurance audit of the organization’s training department. Which condition would constitute a threat to the internal auditor’s objectivity, as defined by The IIA’s Code of Ethics?
a) The auditor has a very unfavorable opinion of the department based on experience with its internal seminars.
b) The auditor has a background in developing training materials from a previous job with another organization.
c) The auditor has a very favorable opinion of the organization overall based on its national reputation.
d) The auditor is unfamiliar with the basic principles of training.
a) The auditor has a very unfavorable opinion of the department based on experience with its internal seminars.
Rationale
The internal auditor’s objectivity may be compromised by either a positive or negative predisposition in regard to the audit client. However, the overall organization is not the current audit client, and, in assessing objectivity, it is important to consider what would be “reasonable” versus what could be perceived as a conflict of interest. Experience with another organization’s approach to training is not necessarily a problem for objectivity.
Which is an example of professional skepticism?
a) Verifying that vendors paid in the first quarter were listed in the vendor history file
b) Flowcharting key controls to form the basis of an audit program
c) Interviewing staff on a process within the business function being reviewed
d) Identifying best practices within the industry
a) Verifying that vendors paid in the first quarter were listed in the vendor history file
Rationale
Maintaining professional skepticism ensures that internal auditors don’t make undue assumptions about the validity of support, such as information received, without an appropriate level of objective verification of such support.
An internal auditor is reviewing the construction of a bridge that is being built by his company. The auditor is not an engineer, but upon reviewing the bridge specifications, he notices that certain materials are being substituted with other products. What would the next step be?
a) Review the issue with an independent engineer obtained through a trade association or on retainer.
b) Review the issue with the project manager of the bridge construction project.
c) Do nothing, as the substituted products were approved by the project manager, who is experienced in many bridge construction projects.
d) Call the vendor that sent the material and inquire if the substituted products are within specifications.
a) Review the issue with an independent engineer obtained through a trade association or on retainer.
Rationale
Internal auditors should have no personal or professional involvement with or allegiance to the area being audited and should maintain an unbiased and impartial mindset in regard to all engagements. Internal auditors should not subordinate their judgment on audit matters to that of others.
The best rationale for rotating internal auditors so that different individuals are assigned to consecutive audits of a given auditee is to
a) increase the diligence exercised by internal auditors who know that the quality of their work will be apparent to the next set of internal auditors.
b) avoid the development of bias toward a given auditee.
c) promote rapid professional development on the part of internal auditors by exposing them to the full range of organizational activities.
d) prevent burnout on the part of the internal auditor, which may lead to excessive turnover in the internal audit department.
b) avoid the development of bias toward a given auditee.
Rationale
Avoiding the development of bias is the primary reason. The alternatives may be desirable, but they are not the basis for the rotation preference.
A new senior internal auditor was a compliance manager in the organization prior to joining the internal audit department. After joining the internal audit department, when can the senior auditor participate in a compliance assurance engagement?
a) Immediately.
b) In six months.
c) In one year.
d) In ninety days.
c) In one year.
Rationale
Standard 1130.A3 states that objectivity is “presumed to be impaired if an internal auditor provides assurance services for an activity for which they had responsibility within the previous year.”
An internal auditor is assigned to an operations audit to assess the efficiency of recently introduced just-in-time manufacturing procedures. The auditor finds out that he knows the external consultant who is on site managing the implementation of the new system; this person was the adviser on the auditor’s thesis and was instrumental in getting him his first job. Which of the following responses by the auditor would be most consistent with The IIA’s International Professional Practices Framework?
a) The internal auditor should disclose the relationship to the chief audit executive (CAE), and the CAE may choose to assign a different internal auditor.
b) The internal auditor need not disclose the relationship but should be certain that he has no contact, such as an audit interview, with the consultant during the course of the audit.
c) The internal auditor should disclose the potential conflict of interest to the board or audit committee, preferably in writing.
d) The potential conflict should be disclosed to the engagement client before accepting the engagement.
a) The internal auditor should disclose the relationship to the chief audit executive (CAE), and the CAE may choose to assign a different internal auditor.
Rationale
Potential impairments to objectivity or independence should be disclosed to the CAE before accepting the engagement. In a consulting engagement such as this one, the CAE would be likely to remove the internal auditor only if the CAE were concerned about conformance to the Code of Ethics and the auditor’s ability to perform and maintain objectivity.
Which of the following would most likely cause an internal auditor to lose objectivity?
a) The passage of time between audits.
b) Asking a colleague for input or feedback.
c) Corroboration of judgement by others.
d) A bonus largely based on client satisfaction surveys.
d) A bonus largely based on client satisfaction surveys.
Rationale
If an internal auditor’s bonus is based on client satisfaction, the auditor may hesitate to report negative results that may cause the client to report low satisfaction ratings. Corroboration of judgement by others, the passage of time between audits, and asking a colleague for input or feedback are factors that mitigate threats to objectivity.
The chief audit executive (CAE) is informed by a client just before a scheduled assurance engagement is about to begin that the agreed-upon schedule will have to be significantly shortened to accommodate an unexpected crisis that has tied up most of the client’s resources. The internal auditors will have less time for interviews and observations because of the difficulties the unit is experiencing. Which of the following actions should the CAE take?
a) The CAE should consider the situation a red flag and schedule a fraud audit.
b) The CAE should change the schedule according to the client’s needs and document the change in the final report.
c) Since schedules are not specified in the audit charter, the situation is not a limitation of scope, and the CAE can use his or her judgment about informing the board.
d) Inform the board of the situation, preferably in writing, because it is a limitation of scope.
d) Inform the board of the situation, preferably in writing, because it is a limitation of scope.
Rationale
Restrictions of an approved schedule are a limitation of scope and should therefore be reported to the board, preferably in writing (Implementation Guide 1130). Difficulties arise in the normal course of business and do not, of themselves, constitute sufficient evidence to warrant a fraud audit.