Summative Assessment 1 Flashcards
(54 cards)
1
Q
Attention Grabbing, Has the Thesis Statement and purpose
A
INTRODUCTION
2
Q
Develops the Main IDea, Gives examples, has multiple paragraphs, and each paragraph has to support the thesis statement.
A
BODY
3
Q
Briefly review the supports and thesis statement, and leaves the audience with a theme
A
CONCLUSION
4
Q
The Whole essay supports the main Idea with no negations
A
UNITY
5
Q
Neat sentence flow
A
COHERENCE
6
Q
Use of Transitional words
A
COHESION
7
Q
this is part of many essays, and writers often tell an anecdote to support an argument.
A
NARRATION
8
Q
- Details the characteristics of the topic
A
NARRATION
9
Q
Details the characteristics of the topic
A
DESCRIPTION
10
Q
- Can be physical or non-physical
- literal or figurative
- a certain order is followed in describing (Spatial order - left to right)
A
DESCRIPTION
11
Q
- series of steps in a procedure in chronological order and shows how this sequence of steps leads to results
A
PROCESS
12
Q
- Explaining how to do something
A
PROCESS
13
Q
the pattern of development that uses a single extended example or a series of shorter examples to support a thesis
A
EXEMPLIFICATION/ILLUSTRATION
14
Q
- providing specific instances in support
A
EXEMPLIFICATION/ILLUSTRATION
15
Q
reasons of occurrence or the predicted occurrence
A
CAUSE AND EFFECT
16
Q
- if Process describes how something happens, BLANK shows why something happens.
A
CAUSE AND EFFECT
17
Q
- the writer explains what something is
A
DEFINITION
18
Q
- explanation of the nature of a word, thing, or idea
A
DEFINITION
19
Q
Most good definition essays are really BLANK. making people understand what they thought they understand already.
A
REDEFINITION
20
Q
- Presents an issue, and the writer’s stance
A
PERSUASION
21
Q
- opinions are shared in order to make others believe.
A
PERSUASION
22
Q
- opinions are shared in order to make others believe.
A
ARGUMENTATION
23
Q
it must establish a clear thesis and follow sound reasoning
A
ARGUMENTATION
24
Q
- Identifies a problem of some kind and explore many factors it has
- provides some possible and sound solutions.
A
PROBLEM SOLUTION
25
- comparison between two things of different categories, for explanation
- it has partial similarity
ANALOGY
26
THE ART OF ANALYZING AND EVALUATING THINKING WITH A VIEW TO IMPROVING IT
CRITICAL THINKING
27
WHY IS CRITICAL THINKING NECESSARY?
CRITICAL THINKING IMPROVES AND SAVES LIVES. IT ENABLES US TO EVALUATE HOW EFFECTIVE A THINKING PROCESS IS AND HOW IT HELPS US. AS OPPOSED TO JUST LETTING IT EXIST WITHOUT PURPOSE.
28
CRITIQUING VS. CRITICIZING
Critiquing means to analyze thoughts and assign some sort of value to them, while criticizing means to put down and oppress the idea.
29
Critical thinking raises BLANK, formulating them clearly and precisely.
VITAL QUESTIONS AND PROBLEMS
30
Critical thinking Gather and assess BLANK, using abstract ideas to interpret it effectively.
RELEVANT INFORMATION
31
Critical thinking formulate BLANK, testing them against relevant standards and criteria
WELL REASONED CONCLUSIONS AND SOLUTIONS
32
Critical Thinking helps us think open-mindedly within the alternative systems of thoughts, BLANK, as need be, their assumptions. implications and practical consequences.
RECOGNIZING AND ASSESSING
33
Critical thinking helps to BLANK, with others figuring out their solutions to complex problems
COMMUNICATE EFFECTIVELY
34
1. Could you Elaborate Further?
2. Could you give an example?
3. Can you illustrate what you mean?
CLARITY
35
1. How can we check on that?
2. How can we find out if it's true?
1. How could we verify or test that?
ACCURACY
36
1. Could you be more specific?
2. Could you give me more details?
3. Could you be more exact?
PRECISION
37
1. How does that relate to the problem?
2. How does that bear to the problem?
3. How does that help us in the issue?
RELEVANCE
38
1. What factors make this a difficult problem?
2. What are some of the complexities of this question?
3. What are some difficulties we need to face?
DEPTH
39
1. Do we need to look at this from another perspective?
2. Do we need to consider another point of view?
3. Do we need to look at this in another way?
BREADTH
40
1. Do all these make sense together?
2. Does what you say follow all of the pieces of evidence?
3. Does your first paragraph fit in with your last?
LOGIC
41
1. Is this the central idea to focus on?
2. Is this the most important problem to consider?
3. Which of these facts are most important?
SIGNIFICANCE
42
1. Do I have any vested interest in this issue?
| 2. Am I sympathetically representing the viewpoints of others?
FAIRNESS
43
Generalization of a whole group based on an inadequate sample size
HASTY GENERALIZATION
44
Making a general statement without considering if every case is applicable
DICTO SIMPLICITER
45
A happened, then B happened. Therefore B happened because of A
Post Hoc ergo Propter Hoc
46
What might've happened if a fact did not occur in the past or in the future
Hypothesis Contrary to fact
47
A happened, then A will cause B. B will cause C, And C will cause extinction
Slippery Slope
48
Making Comparisons to prove a point using two unidentical examples
FALSE ANALOGY
49
Attacking the person instead of the argument
Argumentum Ad Hominem (Poisoning the well)
50
An emotional appeal instead of logic
Argumentum Ad Misericordiam (Appeal to emotion)
51
This asserts that since the majority agree to an opinion, then it must be true
Argumentum Ad Populum (Appeal to Popularity)
52
Using a popular figure as a source, even though they do not have enough credibility
Argumentum Ad Verecundiam (Appeal to inappropriate authority)
53
Changing the subject instead of facing the argument
RED HERRING FALLACY
54
An attempt to prove a point by over-simplifying and attacking the arguments of the opposing side
STRAWMAN FALLACY
