Supreme Court Cases Flashcards

(66 cards)

1
Q

busing of parochial school students on public school buses does NOT violate the Establishment Clause

A

EVERSON v. BD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

school-sponsored non-denominational prayer in public schools is a violation of the Establishment Clause

A

ENGLE v. VITALE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Bible reading by public school teachers to students violates Establishment Clause

A

ABINGTON v. SCHEMPP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Lemon Test: have clear secular purpose, neither inhibit nor adv a particular religion, not create an “excessive entanglement” w/ religion

A

LEMON v. KURTZMAN

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Clear & Present Danger Test: speech can be regulated when it presents danger to speaker and audience

A

SCHENK v. US

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

violated student’s 1st rights when wearing peace protesting bands/Preferred Position Doctrine: 1st freedoms are fundamental and any law regulating them is unconstitutional

A

TINKER v. DES MOINES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Fighting Words Exception: if your words may start a riot/disturbance among the ppl, they’re not protected

A

CHAPLINSKY v. NEW HAMPSHIRE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

“Fuck the draft!”/ can’t be guilty of underlying msg if they don’t do anything wrong/if you’re not intending to start a riot, you’re free to express yourself

A

COHEN v. CA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

student speech can be regulated when it constitutes a “disruption of the educational process”

A

BETHEL v. FRASER

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

“Bong hits for Jesus”/ student’s speech can be regulated off school grounds if it is contrary to the schools policy

A

MORSE v. FREDERICK

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

flag burning is protected under 1st

A

TEXAS v. JOHNSON

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

cross-burning protected speech under 1st

A

VIRGINIA v. BLACK

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

obscenity defined according to community standards rather than national

A

MILLER v. CA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

first ruling on the regulation of materials distributed via Internet/challenged overly broad CDA and for violating 1st

A

RENO v. ACLU

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

child pornograpghy/CPPA overbroad in definition and not consistent with Miller & Ferber

A

ASHCROFT v. FREE SPEECH COALITION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

polygamy/rational basis test: govt can’t regulate religiously-motivated conduct unless it proves basis for doing so

A

REYNOLDS v. US

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

incorporated 1st Free Exercise Clause to states through 14th

A

CONTWELL v. CONNECTICUT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

state law mandating school attendance to age 16 unduly burdened Amish practice of religion as it forced them to be exposed to “wordly influences” which impinged upon their religious practices

A

WISCONSIN v. YODER

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Free Exercise Clause allows govt to not exempt sacramental peyote use and thus deny unemployment benefits

A

EMPLOYMENT DIVISION v. SMITH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

ordinances which appear neutral that burden religious sacrifices/practice are unconstitutional/govt would need to demonstrate “compelling interest” in passing this law

A

CHURCH OF THE LUKUNI BABALU AYE v. CITY OF HIALEAH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

enabling legislation to reform use of eminent domain (FL, GA, SD, PA)

A

BACKLASH OF KELO

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

TV news can broadcast names listed on public indictments

A

COX BROADCASTING v. COHN

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

names of those who sign public petitions can be published

A

JOHN DOE #1 v. REED

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

judges can bar the press

A

SHEPPARD v. MAXWELL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
confiscated materials are protected by 4th and are illegally obtained (no warrant for that particular material)/Exclusionary Rule: evidence obtained in absence of warrant is inadmissible in criminal proceedings
MAPP v. OHIO
26
Good Faith Exception/ evidence obtained w a warrant that was improperly issued is admissible as long as officers were acting in good faith
US v. LEON
27
evidence for case that found defendant guilty after participating in illegally issued search does not need to be suppressed if it was found after the "knock and announce" rule is violated
HUDSON v. MICHIGAN
28
random drug tests don't violate Reasonable Searches and Seizure Clause/reasonableness balanced by individual interests against govts
VERONA v. ACTON
29
schools can drug test anyone if it is in the school's interest (protection)
POTTAWATOMIE BOARD OFEDUCATION v. EARLS
30
Reasonable Suspicion/ violates student's 4th if their stuff is searched bc they're suspected of violating school rules/criminal activity
NJ v. TLO
31
evidence derived which is self-incriminating is dismissed if the person isn't told their rights before questioning
MIRANDA v. ARIZONA
32
"I'm entitled to council!"
GIDEON v. WAINWRIGHT
33
you must report discriminating paycheck within 180 days of first paycheck
LEDBETTER v. GOODYEAR
34
contraception and abortion are a mother's privacy
ROE v. WADE
35
any state funded hospitals can give abortions
WEBSTER v. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES
36
student stated prayer at school violates Establishment Clause
SANTE FE v. DOE
37
student led Christian clubs with volunteer advisor do not violate Equal Access Act
WESTSIDE v. MERGENS
38
prayer at graduation service violates Establishment Clause
LEE v. WEISMAN
39
the restrictions of waiting period for signed and conformed consent are an endued burden on women's right to privacy (marital not parental)
PLANNED PARENTHOOD v. CASEY
40
"Living Will Case" states can condition the exercise of a patients right to terminate life-sustaining treatment if shown "clear & convincing" evidence of the patient to exercise such right
CRUZAN v. MISSOURI
41
"liberty" of the right to assist suicide is not protected by the Due Process Clause
WASHINGTON v. GLUCKSBERG
42
doctors can assist with suicide | doctors aren't dealing drugs they're prescribing them
GONZALES v. OREGON
43
anti-sodomy laws are a violation of right to privacy
LAWRENCE v. TEXAS
44
Defensive Marriage Act was a violation of Equal Protection Clause gays recognized marriage
WINDSOR v. US
45
"reverse discrimination case" the University of California's policy of affirmative action violated Equal Protection Clause because you can't set aside spots for minorities
REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA v. BAKKE
46
dealt with maintaining campus diversity
GRUTTER v. BOLLINGER
47
predetermined points given to minority groups is unconstitutional (college point system) can't rely on numbers to rate applications based on racial status
GRATZ v. BOLLINGER
48
admission's policy of only taking top 10% was not unconstitutional
FISHER v. UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS
49
states can constitutionally enact Legislation requiring persons of different races to use "separate but equal" segregated facilities
PLESSY v. FERGUSON
50
President and Congress did not exceed their war powers by excluding and restricting the rights of Americans from Japanese descent need to protect espionage outweighed "equal rights"
KOREMATS v. US
51
race segregation of children in public schools deprives the minority children of the equal protection of laws "separate but equal" is inherently unequal in the context of public education
BROWN v. BOARD OF EDUCATION
52
mandated teaching of "creation science" as a balance to teaching of evolution is unconstitutional
EDWARDS v. AGUILLARD
53
the execution of minors violates the prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment found in 8th Amendment
ROPER v. SIMMONS
54
anyone under age of 16 cannot be given the death penalty
STANFORD v. KENTUCKY
55
life in prison without parole is cruel and unusual punishment for minors 17 and under
GRAHAM v. FLORIDA | SULLIVAN v. FLORIDA
56
the 1st, 3rd, 4th, and 9th Amendments create the right to privacy in marital relations
GRISWOLD v. CONNECTICUT
57
imposition of the death sentence is not prohibited under 8th and 14th Amendments as cruel and unusual punishment
GREGG v. GEORGIA
58
execution of mentally retarded persons cruel and unusual punishment and prohibited by 8th Amendment
ATKINS v. VIRGINIA
59
state cannot permit private organization to practice discrimination
SMITH v. ALLWRIGHT
60
14th Amendment covers all races not just blacks
HERNANDEZ v. TEXAS
61
antimiscegenation statutes violate Equal Protection Clause of 14th Amendment
LOVING v. VIRGINIA
62
busing is a constitutional mean of achieving public school desegregation
SWANN v. CHARLOTTE MECKLENBERG
63
under Civil Rights Act of 1964, discrimination based of race, color, or national origin in any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance
LAU v. NICHOLS
64
places of public accommodation have no "right" to select guests as they see fit, free from government regulation
HEART OF ATLANTA MOTEL v. US
65
district court can only maintain control over a school system in the categories which it has failed to abide by its court-ordered desegregation plan
FREEMAN v. PITTS
66
ruling clarified for employers the steps they may take in order to maintain a diverse workplace while avoiding discrimination
RICCI v. DESTEFANO