Survival Analysis Final Flashcards
(36 cards)
Cox Model Assumptions
- Proportional Hazards
- Linear functional form of covariates
- Well fit to data
- No influencing points
Res. For PH Assumption
Scheonfeld
Score
Linearity of Covariates
Martingale
Overall Fit
Cox-Snell
Outliers
Score
Deviance
Influential Points
Score
Deviance
Stratification Assumption
That there is a different baseline hazard rate for each strata
That the effect of the covariate is the same
That the effect of the stratified variable doesnt need to be estimated.
Used for matched pair data, differing clinical trial data, and PH violators
Proportional Hazard AFT Models
Weibull and Exponential
Proportional Odds AFT Models
Log Logistic
AFT Interpretation
exp(Beta) is the multiplicative factor of TIME
Cox Model Building
- Start with global null test
- Find what confounders are significant and lower the AIC
- Add these one at a time to the model
- Continue till there are no more significant factors
AIC
AIC=-2LogL+pk
k=2, p=number of parameters, L=likelihood eqn.
Local Test
Tests a subset of q parameters of the full (p) model
b1=qx1 vector, b2=(p-q)x1 vector
When using the c vector you are using a Wald test with a chi square distribution with q DF
Piecewise Exponential Parametric Model
Separate the model so there are different models for different chunks of time
There will be different coefficients and baseline rates for each chunk
Accelerated Failure Time Models
Y=log(t)=bX+s*e
b is parameters, X is the covariate, s is the unknown scale, and e is the error from known distribution
Parametric Model Difference
Gives shape to the hazard curve where cox doesn’t. Treats the baseline hazard as a non-needed parameter.
Use MLE instead of partial likelihood since all data goes into the model and not just the ones with observed event times
PH doesn’t hold true for the majority of the models
Using Parametric and NP Models (Which one)
Check fit (CS Res), outliers (score), AIC
Bias due to omitted due to variables is more important than the model fit. Most will give roughly the same
NP is 95% as efficient as Parametric
95% CI on HR in Cox
exp(B+/-1.96*SE)
Partial Likelihood with Ties
- Breslow (use with few ties/default in SAS)
Adds each of their likelihood to eqn. at time point - Efron
Closer to the actual partial likelihood
Acts the same as Breslow with small ties - Cox
Assumes a logistic model for h(t)
Likelihood Ratio Test
Must estimate the Betas
Chi Square with p Df (q DF for local test)
Wald Test
Must estimate the Betas
Chi Square with p Df (q DF for local test)
Score Test
Don’t need to estimate Betas with the global test
Do need to estimate with local test
Chi Square with p DF (q DF for local test)
With no ties the score test becomes a log rank test
Partial Likelihood for Cox
It is the product of:
hazard of the individual that died at that time point/(sum of the hazard for all individuals at risk just prior to the event time)
Take the partial derivative of log likelihood with respect to each beta and set it equal to zero. Then solve with an iterative method
Martingale Residual
Difference over time of observed number of events minus the expected under the model
Calculated off individual
Checks for the functional form fit of each covariate
Transformation of the CS residuals