Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Li2 Syntax, Semantics, Pragmatics > Syntax 2 - X' Theory, Wh-Movement, Pronouns: Binding & C-Command > Flashcards

Syntax 2 - X' Theory, Wh-Movement, Pronouns: Binding & C-Command Flashcards

1
Q

The Purpose of X’ Theory

A

Refine and Improve upon P.S Rules.

Formalises an intuition about closeness, that the complement is closer to X than the specifier, (the complement is more often obligatory).
- this is evidenced by phrases such as ‘very [angry with John] and [worried about Mary]’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

‘endocentric’

A

contains a head

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

According to X’ what does every endocentric phrase contain?

How is this represented in rules (for a bare tree
for English ordering)

A

XP - (specifier) X (complement)

XP > specifier X’
X’ > X complement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the maximal projection?

A

XP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the intermedial projection?

A

X’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Do you need to include XP & X’ if the whole phrase just consists of X?

A

YES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

In X’ theory, are auxiliary verbs a constituent of VP?

A

NO - different grammatical category:

they can’t be elided
separated in qs and tag qs
behave differently with negatives

Sentences like ‘John [should talk to this man] and [will then get on with his day]’ show that there is a constituent with aux & VP.

TP!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

CP >

A

CP > spec C’
C’ > C TP
(TP is the obligatory complement of C)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How to show adjuncts as distinct from complements in X’?

Use VP as example.

A

Complement:
VP > (spec) V’
V’ > V complement

Adjunct:
VP > (spec) V’
V’ > V’ adjunct
V’ > V (complement)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How does the difference in structure for adjuncts account for ‘do so’ substitution.

A

‘Do so’ takes the place of V’. Because there are 2 V’s this explains how the adjunct can be included in or excluded from the substitution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How to represent determiners in the specifier?

A

DP > (spec) D’

D’ > D (comp)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Represent possessives e.g John’s cat

A

NP > DP N’
DP > spec (John) D’
D’ > D (‘s)
N’ > N (cat)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Category of possessives like ‘my’?

A

D

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Non-restrictive relative clause vs restrictive relative clause?

A

Non-restrictive: the norwegians, who are rich, send their children away. (the norwegians, all of whom are rich, all send their children away).
Restrictive: the norwegians who are rich, send their children away.
(the rich norwegians send their children away, the others don’t.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Domains associated with different levels of X’ phrases?

A

CP - discourse domain
TP - anchoring domain (temporal/mood)
VP - thematic domain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Can you stack specifiers?

A

NO.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

How to account for stackable modifiers to the left of X’?

A

Adjuncts! head final adjuncts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Any differing letter notations from PS rules?

A 
AP instead of AdjP 
TP instead of S
T instead of Aux 
CP instead of S' 
C instead of COMP 
DP instead of DetP (if that's a thing lol)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

category of ‘than’?

A

than her : preposition

than she is : complementiser

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

How to deal with multiple auxiliaries?

A

TP > spec T’
T’ > T (should) TP
TP > spec T’
T’ > T (have) VP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Complexities with temporal adjuncts?

A

Do you want to apply to VP or whole TP (and which TP). Depends. Probably for other adjuncts too lolz.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

locative information TENDS to be

A

adjunct don’t hold me to it lol do ur best to figure it out

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Do we only need building rules in grammar?

A

No! Movement Rules! These manipulate structures by moving elements into different positions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

How does the X’ schema allow movement

A

Fronting is possible due to the empty Spec CP position.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Types of Movement Rules:

A

Head movement, NP movement, Wh Movement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What is head movement?

A

subject auxiliary inversion - auxiliary moves from T-C leaving trace t

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What is NP movement?

A

Passives

‘Ian invents fish sentences’ > ‘Fish sentences are invented’

28
Q

What is Wh-Movement?

A

Moves an XP (in the form of a wh element) to the beginning of the sentence to form (usually) a question.

Object NP can move, as can indirect object NP (preposition stranding), indirect object PP (pied piping), AP & CP. (TP and VP cannot).

Echo questions show where the wh element originates in the sentence. This is where the t is left.

Wh-elements move to spec CP.

Why? If VP expresses the arguments (thematic domain) and TP anchors (tense mood agreement), CP is for clause typing (discourse domain). By moving to CP we show that it is a q not a declarative.

29
Q

What is vacuous movement?

A

Questions in which surface structure doesn’t change e.g ‘who saw John’ but Wh-element is moved from subject position to spec CP.

30
Q

Does Wh-movement still apply in indirect questions?

A

Yes: ‘I don’t know what John read’

But obvi no aux inversion.

31
Q

Long distance Wh-movement.

A

Wh-movement is unbounded:
‘Who did you believe that John said that Mary saw?’
BUT wh-element leaves a t in all spec CPs.

Sometimes FLA children (not just English) repeat Wh in the trace positions. Sometimes used as evidence that this position is filled. (but this is only in complex structures involving 2 or more clauses!)
(Radford, 2004: 156)

32
Q

Locality conditions / Island Constraints

and what are Islands?

A

Islands are constituents off of which Wh-elements can’t move.

Left Branch Constraint: Wh movement can’t apply to the left branch of an NP or AP.

Wh-islands: if there is a wh element in spec CP that creates an island. (wh-elements cannot not move past each other).

Complex NP constraint: ‘which girl did you write a song which was about’ (can’t move wh element out of a complex NP < that is a CP embedded in an NP)

Negative islands: moved wh-element must come from the clause which is negated, not a subclause.

Subject condition: if the subject is a CP you can’t extract something from it.

Coordinate structure constraint.

33
Q

‘which cake did Mary buy?’

What is the category of ‘which’?

A

D

34
Q

Is spec position a parameter?

A

Yeh, though languages love spec left (not if they’re VOS tho).

35
Q

Difference between whether and if.

A

Whether can take non-finite complements while if cannot.

Theresa links this to the ‘wh’ nature of the element and also that ‘whether that’ constructions were an option earlier in the history of English.

36
Q

Exceptional Case Marking:

A

Bizarre cases in which the subject of an infinitival verb is marked as object case. Caused by ‘raising to object verbs’
Modelled in X’ as having no CP, just a TP complement of V. There would be too much structure between verb and complement.

37
Q

Distinguish between particle verbs and prepositional complements?

A

If you substitute a pronoun in for the object, it will go between the 2 elements of a particle verb, but will remain to the right of a verb + preposition.

38
Q

What is binding?

A

The dependency between different elements in a hierarchical structure.

39
Q

What are pronominals and their types?

A

Pronominals replace an antecedent.

anaphors - an NP that obligatorily takes its meaning from another NP in the sentence (reflexive or reciprocal)
pronouns - an NP that may (but need not) take its meaning from another NP in the sentence (he, she, they)
R-expressions - An NP that gets its meaning by referring to an entity in the world. (or at least a concept lolz) (no antecedent)

40
Q

What is C-Command?

A

Constituent command: A formal indicator of relative structural height. (c-commands = binds)

A node X c-commands another node Y iff:
X doesn’t dominate Y.
Y doesn’t dominate X.
The first branching node dominating X dominates Y.

(A node C-commands its sister and everything she dominates.)

41
Q

What is the binding domain?

A

The BD for an anaphor A is the smallest XP containing A and either:

  • a subject distinct from A
  • a finite T
42
Q

Co-indexing in binding questions?

A

antecedent should be coindexed with anaphor or pronoun (coindexing is just marking that they have the same referent)

43
Q

SO, what are the 3 binding principles?

A

A) An anaphor must be bound within its binding domain.
B) A pronoun must be free in its binding domain. *
C) An R-expression must be free.

  • pronouns do not HAVE to be bound at all.
44
Q

What is symmetric vs asymmetric c-command?

A

symmetric c-command if A c-commands B AND B c-commands A

asymmetric if one c-commands the other but it is not reciprocated.

45
Q

What is government?

A

Node A governs node B if:
A c-commands B
there is no node G such that G is c-commanded by A and asymmetrically c-commands B.

46
Q

Phrase government & Head government?

A

phrase government: *there is no NP (or whatever the phrase is) G such that…

head government: *there is no head G such that…

47
Q

What is an antecedent?

A

an NP that gives its meaning to another NP in the sentence.

48
Q

Is C-command just relevant to binding theory?

A

C-command is also important to Wh-movement: Wh-elements always move to a c-commanding position.
and all movement? investigate?

49
Q

Could you have a TP without a subject?

A

Yes in certain cases, embedded TPs can have non-overt subjects:
‘I remember going to the cinema’
‘I wondered whether to

50
Q

So we can have CP subjects, but what do Haegeman & Gueron say about representing them in X’?

A 
CP adjunction 
CP > CP CP 
CP > subject clause 
CP > C (empty) TP (subjectless sentence)
(the subject goes in spec CP?!)

This is due to differing behaviour of CP subjects in other languages like dutch. IT IS THOUGHT THAT A CP SUBJECT HAS A DISCOURSE ROLE - not totally natural sounding, SO MOVE INTO DISCOURSE DOMAIN?

PP subjects can go in spec TP though.

51
Q

What are VP-shells and why do we need them?

A

VP1 > V’1
V’1 > V1 (verb! indexed) VP2
VP2 > spec (1st object) V’2
V’2 > V2 (trace of verb) NP (2nd object)

Ditransitive verbs often have 2 objects both with object (complement) properties
e.g in I give louise the draft 
you can passivise as 
'louise is given the draft' 
but you can't substitute 
I did so the draft. 
both have complement (object properties)
52
Q

How does Haegeman represent non-overt subjects?

A

ec : empty category

and she coindexes them

53
Q

c-command seems to affect all movement and antecedent, but why is the c-commanding position different elements take different?

is there one type of movement which doesn’t seem to be affected?

A

discourse domain
temporal / mood domain
thematic domain

then I guess u can also argue that other positions are full

‘lowering’ of tense info to verb (affix hopping!) isn’t c-command related
affix hopping explains verbal morphology without V-T movement.
Also explains auxiliary & inflection (bipartite expression- •• extended exponence: the phenomenon whereby a particular grammatical feature, unit, structure, etc. is realized by more than one formative, or other kind of element. Thus in English the perfect is realized by a form of the auxiliary verb have in combination with a past participle.)

54
Q

Will you get copulas?

A

no we haven’t done them :) but lowkey
‘be’ is the only English verb that does V-T movement (unless there is an auxiliary of course).
copulas are also only verbs to take adjectival complements

lowkey ‘baa baa blacksheep’ varieties of English do V-T movement with lexical ‘have’ as well
(have you any wool)

55
Q

Problems in the Binding Theory

from Haegeman and Gueron

A

Implicit Arguments: (Chomsky)
*They told stories about them.
They told my stories about them.
(my is an implicit subject and thus the NP my stories about them is the Binding Domain and thus ‘them’ is free within its binding domain.

They heard stories about them.
(is like the first sentence except grammatical - bc the implicit subject is that somebody else is telling the stories)

There is also another one if you want to look back.

56
Q

If a position in the S-structure is missing, it is

A

not OVERTLY specified

57
Q

What is VISH, how to represent it?

A

VP-internal subject hypothesis: the idea that subjects are generated in spec VP and moved to the temporal/mood domain.

leave a trace t in spec VP!

58
Q

anything interesting about ‘for him to err is strange’

A

‘him’ is accusative case as it is in fact the complement of a preposition ‘for’ (and complements of Vs and Ps are accusative), however in this case the P is being used as a C to create a CP subject where ‘him’ is the subject of the subject.

59
Q

Writing about the hierarchy of TP shells

A

so the domain isn’t just temporal/mood domain it’s acc ‘anchoring’, and different auxiliaries appear in the following order: STRICT
mood, tense, aspect, voice (would have been being)

60
Q

Category of whose

A

D head

It’s just that diachronically it was who’s

61
Q

What is PRO

A

used in place of non-overt subjects (e.g in non-finite clauses)

62
Q

Determining where to put adjuncts

A

is it in discourse (frankly), anchoring (lately) or thematic (quickly) domain?

63
Q

Where does ‘right’ or ‘just’ go

A

spec PP

if it is before a preposition obvi lol

64
Q

2?

A

Num or Adj (connects as adjunct)

65
Q

A lot of?

A

grammaticalised from NP PP to a phrasal DP

66
Q

Why does affix hopping happen?! (domain wise)

A

it was an ugly theoretical assumption - empirically driven.
now the idea is that syntactically relevant features rather than concrete morphemes exist in T and are merely realised in the phonological form.

Li2 Syntax, Semantics, Pragmatics (5 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions