Team leadership Flashcards

(92 cards)

1
Q

Team definition

A

A team is a collection of individuals who…

  • work together on tasks and projects
  • share responsibility for outcomes
  • see themselves and who are seen as an intact social entity
  • are embedded in one or more larger social systems
  • manage their relationships across organizational boundaries
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What do you consider
to be the best predictor
of individual performance?

A

-emotional intelligence
-individual job performance
-solve complex issue

—> intelligence and mental ability the most individual performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Team performance?

A

Having a Team with a equal time of talking where most productive
—> communication most important : helps to solve the complex problem —> better result in the end

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Team ≠ Team

A

People who are really good but in team not
–> Sum of individual performances
+ Process gains
- Process losses
= Team performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The Input-Mediator-Output Model

A

voir page 15 (graph)

This diagram represents a team effectiveness model, illustrating how organizational and team contexts (e.g., culture, leadership, and diversity) influence team states (e.g., trust) and team processes (e.g., communication). These interactions ultimately determine team effectiveness, measured by goal achievement. The development process follows a structured progression from context to processes, states, and outcomes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Our goal is team effectiveness
But what does that actually mean ?

A

-Work outcome
-Collaboration skills
-Individual Development
=Effectiveness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Work outcomes

A

The work results are (at least) acceptable to those who receive, review, or use them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Collaboration skills

A

The team members enhance their ability to collaborate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Individual Development

A

Experiences foster
personal growth and
well-being of the
members

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Model by Katzenbach

A
  1. Working group
    2.Pseudo-Team
    3.Potential team
  2. Real team
    5.High performance team
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Working group

A

-No demanding performance requirements

-No mutual accountability

-Interaction among members primarily for the exchange of information, perspectives, and ‘best practices’

-Making decisions that support the individual member
in their performance within their area of
responsibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Pseudo-Team

A

-There may be demanding performance
requirements or opportunities

-However: Lack of focus and insufficient striving for collective performance

-Joint performance is lower than the potential of the individual members

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Potential team

A

-Challenging performance goals and striving to
improve performance capacity

-However: The need for greater clarity regarding
common goals, shared performance objectives,
and collective effort

-No real feeling of joint responsibility («we feeling»)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Real team

A

-Small group of people whose abilities complement one another

-Joint striving for common purpose, shared performance goals and collective effort

-Joint responsibîlity and a strong «We Feeling»

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

High performance team

A

-Fulfills the same requirements as the „Real team“

-However, above and beyond, its members involve
themselves actively in furthering their colleagues personal development and success

-Members develop strong interpersonal ties and show high levels of trust

-Identification , learning,motivation and passion are all very high

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Model by Katzenbach:
Principles for High Performance Teams: 6 principles

A
  1. Small number of members (<12)

2.Complementary skills and abilities

  1. Shared sense of a common purpose

4.Performance goals are clearly defined

5.Shared working approaches

  1. Mutual accountability and trust
  2. Leaders must be team players
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Tuckman’s Model
Phases of Team Development

A
  1. Forming
  2. Storming
    3.Norming
  3. Performing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Forming (Phases of Team Development)

A

-Getting to know the other members

-Insecurity

  • Orientation-seeking

-Dependent on team leader

-Determining acceptable behavior in the group

-Mutual expectancies

-Group forming

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Storming (Phases of Team Development)

A

-Personal positioning

-Expressing personal opinions and determining positions

-Expression of differences (cultural,
opinions, values)

-Negotiation of positions and roles

-Power play and building a hierarchy

-Dangerous phase for stereotypes
and group fluctuation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Norming (Phases of Team Development)

A

-Intensive personal
participation and commitment

-Self-confidence

-Group identification and “we” feeling

-Cooperation, consensus, and respect

-Efficiency and effectivity in task
accomplishment

-Agreement on common goals, standards,
rules, roles, work organization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Performing (Phases of Team Development)

A

-Every individual is an important part of the group

-Individual ideas become part of the team’s success

-Mutual acceptance

-Collaboration

-Caring for team members

-Corporate Identity

-Effective performance
(Identification with task and group)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Forming (Leader Support in Team Development)

A

-Provide orientation

-Clarify roles

-Determine work processes

-Promote team building

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Storming(Leader Support in Team Development)

A

-Manage emotional reactions

-Intervene in conflicts

-Provide help and support

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Norming (Leader Support in Team Development)

A

-Develop and establish group
norms

-Work on mutual acceptance

-Highlight commonalities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Performing (Leader Support in Team Development)
-Maintain performance -Continue to promote successful collaboration -Integrate new members -Avoid relapse in prior phases
26
Diversity in Teams
Team leadership includes diversity management * There is an increasing level of diversity/heterogeneity in teams (e.g., with respect to gender, age, nationality etc.) * Causes for increased diversity, e.g.: − Globalization − Individual mobility, changes in roles − Demographic changes
27
Primary (superficial) diversity dimensions: example
e.g., age , gender , nationality , origin , education level , hierarchical level , function
28
Primary (superficial) diversity: definiton
* These are usually visible to all members at the beginning of a team formation, as they are perceivable without interaction. * These dimensions are not easily changeable and are often used as a basis for distinction and discrimination.
29
Secondary (deep) diversity dimensions: definition
* These emerge only during the course of team development * They can often overlay the primary diversity characteristics.
30
Secondary (deep) diversity dimensions: example
Communication style, family status , personality , work style, work values , work experience , informal knowledge and role in the organization , native language , religion )
31
Team Composition Relationship Between Team Diversity and Team Performance
Team Diversity --> +/- Team performance page 39
32
Team Composition Relationship Between Team Diversity and Team Performance
New research makes it increasingly clear that companies with more diverse workforces perform better financially --> Functional diversity shows mixed effects, with some studies indicating that it amplifies conflicts and reduces performance, while others show the exact opposite.
33
Consequences of diversity: Two opposing perspectives : optimistic view
Improved information processing: «More Diversity, more cognitive resources, better outcomes of teamwork.»
34
Consequences of diversity: Two opposing perspectives : pessimistic view
Social categorization leads to subgroup formation: «More diversity, worse interpersonal processes, diminished team outcomes.»
35
Leading diverse teams means:
Realizing the positive potential while preventing possible negative effects
36
Social Identity Theory: Basic assumptions
-Individuals like and are attracted to others that are similar to themselves (e.g. gender, age, values etc.) - Synergy effect: Resources can complement each other („The whole is more than the sum of its parts“)
37
Social Identity Theory: The effect on groups and organizations
-Diverse teams may come to better decisions due to their plus of resources (more knowledge, more competencies, more experiences) than uniform teams -Diverse teams may avoid ‘group think’ more effectively -Diverse teams may help to increase organizational performance
38
Groupthink
The tendency for Groups to think in Harmony
39
Similarity Attraction & Social Identity Theory: Basic assumption
-Individuals like and are attracted to others that are similar to themselves (e.g. gender, age, values etc.) -Formation of subgroups in teams based on diversity characteristics and identification of team members with these subgroups
40
Similarity Attraction & Social Identity Theory: The effects on groups and organizations
-Dissimilar persons within a team tend to reduce communication and cooperation -Due to risk of subgroup formation: Less cohesion, less commitment to joint tasks, reduced performance -Diverse teams may reduce organizational performance due to mistakes in communication, reduced cooperation etc.
41
Diversity in Teams: Information processing theory
-Increased performance due to enhanced problem solving and decision making -Increased creativity,innovation, and customer understanding -Mutual learning and motivation -Avoidance of groupthink
42
Diversity in Teams: Similarity attraction & social identity theory
-Conflicts due to prejudices and stereotyping -Mistrust and misunderstandings -Communication and coordination problems: process losses -Loss of productivity due to increased time investment
43
Team Composition: Recommendations for Leaders
1. Consciously put together diverse teams 2.Develop a shared group or organizational identity 3.Develop a culture for diversity and appreciation
44
Consciously put together diverse teams
-Use diverse teams above all for complex tasks, which involve departing from the routine - Avoid strong faultlines (imaginary lines between the person of the subgroups within in your team )
45
Develop a shared group or organizational identity
-Convey higher order similarities (company culture and identity, etc.) -Special team building measures, encourage informal contact, etc. -Encourage informal contacts
46
Develop a culture for diversity and appreciation
-Encourage intensive discussions and empathy, openly address differences -Demonstrate value of diversity for the team
47
Team Emergent States (TES): definition
Cognitive, affective, motivational categories that are “dynamic in nature and vary as function of team context, inputs, processes, and outcomes”
48
Team Emergent States (TES): theorie
1. Cognitive Team Emergent States (CTES) 2.Affective Team Emergent States (ATES) 3. Motivational Team Emergent States (MTES) 4.Cognitive/Affective Team Emergent States (CATES) 5. Cognitive/Motivational Team Emergent States (CMTES)
49
Cognitive TES
Cognitive TES concern member beliefs or thoughts 1. Team Cognition 2.Team Trust 3.Team Climates
50
Team Cognition
-Team cognition is the manner in which knowledge for team functioning is mentally organized, represented, and distributed within a team -Antecedents: e.g. Team design, team composition, team leadership -Team cognition positively predicts outcomes such as team performance as well as team behavioral and motivational processes
51
Team Trust
-Team trust reflects members’ beliefs in the «dependability and trustworhiness of team members» -Antecedents: Member ability, integrity, and emotional intelligence -Outcomes: Team trust positively impacts team-level outcomes such as team attitudes, information processing, and performance
52
Team Climates
-Team climates reflect member perceptions of norms, attitudes, and expectations perceived to operate within a specific context -Outcomes: Facet-specific team climates impact team-level performance, behavioral, and cognitive outcome
53
Affective TES
Affective TES includes psychological states relating to feelings, attitudes, and emotions 1. Team Cohesion 2.Team Psychological Safety
54
Team Cohesion
-Team cohesion means members are emotionally attached and bonded to one another and committed toward the team -Observations on changes: Experiments on astronauts in isolated, extreme environments -Antecedents: Shared responsible leadership responsibilities, open information sharing among team members, interdependence among team member -Outcomes: Cohesive teams tend to perform better than non-cohesive teams; also in reverse (better performing teams can become more cohesive as a result of their successes) -Long-term effects: Effects of team cohesion can last even after the team has disbanded – particularly cohesive teams may develop friendships and networks that they draw on for the rest of their lives.
55
Team Psychological Safety
-Team psychological safety concerns beliefs that the team is safe for interpersonal risk-taking -Antecedents: Team leadership and composition -Outcomes: Team psychological safety engenders desirable outcomes including performance, behavioral, and affective outcomes
56
Motivational TES
constructs reflect team beliefs relating to the intensity, direction, and effort regulation toward team task accomplishment 1. Team Confidence
57
Team Confidence
- Despite the proliferation of team confidence-related constructs and team efficacy (beliefs about task-specific team ability) are the most researched. -Antecedents: Organizational support and formalization, team composition, and team leadership (shared, empowering, transformational leadership), team trust and empowerment -Outcomes: Team confidence-related constructs are related to team performance outcomes
58
Team Processes
Team context --> Team states --> team process --> team effectiveness page 55
59
Team Processes Example of Team Processes: Different Types of Conflict
1. Relationship conflict 2. Process conflict 3.Task conflict
60
Relationship conflict
Emotional tensions on an interpersonal basis (e.g., dislike among group members, feelings of tensions and friction) --> To be avoided --> Speak openly, discuss and overcome
61
Process conflict
Controversies over issues of duty, responsibilities, power and resource delegation --> Initially allow and discuss --> To be avoided later on
62
Task conflict
Differences in viewpoints and opinions related to the content of the team‘s tasks --> Allow at the beginning of the project and during the work phase --> Utilize productively by means of discussion rules, brainstorming, etc.
63
Conflicts and Team Performance
A meta-analysis was conducted to examine how three different types of intragroup conflicts affect the group.
64
Conflicts and Team Performance: Results
- Relationship conflicts and process conflicts show a negative correlation with group performance. - Task conflicts show no correlation with group performance. BUT: Task conflicts can negatively impact performance if they excalate into relationship conflicts. page 57
65
Conflicts and Team Performance: correlation
Corrected correlation between task conflict and team performance
66
Consequences of Unresolved Conflicts: Social Loafing
-Social loafing: When working in groups, people put less effort in a task than they would put in the same task when working alone. -Social loafing can occur when individual inputs cannot be identified and decreases motivation -This leads to lower team performance -As one example, social loafing studies observe the “bystander effect” -“Bystander effect”= When the presence of others discourages an individual from intervening in an emergency situation -Underlying problem of the “bystander effect”: Diffusion of responsibility
67
Possibilities to reduce social loafing
-Increase the transparency and identification possibilities of individual results -Incentive system: Combination of individual- and team-based compensation -Allocate meaningful activitites -Offer the possibility for team members to choose their tasks within the team
68
Possibilities to build effective teams : Recommendations for Managers
1. Provide Sufficient Resources & Support 2.Create a Positive Team Culture: 3.Targeted Team Formation & Composition 4.Encourage Team Development & Training 5.Assess the Necessity of Teams
69
Provide Sufficient Resources & Support
- Ensure teams have access to necessary tools, technologies, and budgets. -Establish clear leadership structures to provide direction and foster collaboratio
70
Create a Positive Team Culture
- Promote a supportive climate based on trust and psychological safety - Strengthen teamwork by incentivizing and rewarding collective success
71
Targeted Team Formation & Composition
- Prefer small teams to minimize coordination efforts and inefficiencies - Select members with the right technical skills and interpersonal competencies
72
Encourage Team Development & Training:
- Offer training in communication, conflict resolution, and collaboration - Ensure all team members share a common vision, clear goals, and a unified understanding of tasks
73
Assess the Necessity of Teams
-Implement teams only where interdependent collaboration adds value - Avoid unnecessary team structures when individual work is more efficient
74
Types of diversity in teams and organizations
- Primary (surface) diversity dimensions - Secondary (deep) diversity dimensions
75
Primary (surface) diversity dimensions
- Primary dimensions of diversity are visible for all members right after team composition, because they can be recognized without interaction - Primary dimensions are relatively stable and often provide a basis for boundaries and discrimination
76
Example : Primary (surface) diversity dimensions
- Age - Gender - Nationality / Ethnicity - Education - Hierarchical position - Function in company
77
Secondary (deep) diversity dimensions
- Secondary dimensions of diversity become obvious during the team development process - Primary dimensions are often overlaid by secondary diversity characteristics
78
Example : Secondary (deep) diversity dimensions
- Communication style - Family status - Personality - Role in the organization - Informal knowledge - Religion - Language - Values at work - Foreign experience - Working style
79
Diversity in teams: Consequences of diversity: Two opposing perspectives
1. The optimistic view on diversity: Improved information processing: "More diversity, more cognitive resources, better outcomes of teamwork" 2. The pessimistic view on diversity – Social categorization leads to subgroup formation: "More diversity, worse interpersonal processes, diminished team outcomes"
80
Leading diverse teams means:
Realizing the positive potential while preventing possible negative effects
81
Information processing theory
- Increased performance due to improvement in problem solving and decision-making abilities - Increased creativity, innovation, and customer understanding - Mutual learning and motivation - Avoidance of groupthink
82
Similarity attraction & social identity theory
- Conflicts due to prejudices and stereotyping - Mistrust and misunderstandings - Communication and coordination problems: process losses - Loss of productivity due to increased time investmen
83
Actors + Resources in the Project Phases
1. Start of the Project 2. Early Phase 3. Middle Phase 4. Late Phase
84
Start of the Project
- Identify network of team members (outline network of relationships) - Develop clear understanding of access to external resources (e.g., information, policy, technical support)
85
Early Phase
- Observe and interview environment to better understand the end user - Identify dependencies: Who is affected by the project? Who might potentially take over the project later? Build relationships with these groups - Alignment of own project with the strategic direction of the organization
86
Middle Phase
- Identify missing know-how within the own team and ensure external access to this knowledge. - Close coordination with other teams regarding issues and specifications. Close coordination of schedules - Ensure top management support (facilitated access to resources and decision makers)
87
Late Phase
- Ensure support in the organization to allow for successful implementation - Maintain a good relationship with top management and sustain their enthusiasm for the project
88
Boundary Management – The External Perspective
- The external perspective on teams shows that boundary management activities influence team performance - Boundary management can relate to groups external to the company (e.g., customers, competitors) or internal to the company (e.g., sales, production, marketing) - A clear understanding of the access to key resources and the political landscape (key decision makers) increases a project's chance of success
89
Ancona & Caldwell (1992) distinguish three types of Boundary Management activities
1. Scouting 2. Ambassadorship 3. Task Coordination
90
Scouting
Activities aimed at developing an understanding of the environment (e.g. market) and possible barriers (e.g. technical problems)
91
Ambassadorship
Activities aimed at building a good relationship with decision-makers (e.g. top management)
92
Task Coordination
Activities aimed at gaining access to the resources present in the environment (e.g. know-how of other teams)