Tenta frågor IFRS Flashcards
(42 cards)
What is Fair Value?
Fair value is an exit price (e.g. the price to sell an asset rather than the price to buy that asset). An exit price embodies expectations about the future cash inflows and cash outflows associated with an asset or liability from the perspective of a market participant (i.e. based on buyers and sellers who have certain characteristics, such as being independent and knowledgable about the asset or liability).
Fair value is a market-based measurement, rather than an entity-specific measurement, and is measured using assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk. As a result, an entity’s intention to hold an asset or to settle or otherwise fulfil a liability is not relevant in measuring fair value.
What is the definition of fair value? (After may 2011)
The price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
What are the objectives of IFRS 13 Fair value Measurement?
Stated in paragraph 1:
- to define fair value
- to set out in a single standard a framework for measuring fair value
- to require disclosures about fair value measurement
Describe the IASB standard setting process
Setting the agenda
- Planning the project
- Developing and publishing the discussion paper (incl public consultation)
- Developing and publishing the exposure draft (incl. public consultation)
- Developing and publishing the standard
- Procedures after an IFRS is issued
What is the purpose of financial reporting and what are the fundamental issues with it?
Purpose of financial reporting:
Financial statements are prepared for the purpose of providing information that is useful in making economic decisions.
Fundamental issues
- Who are the users of the accounting statements?
- What is the purpose for which each particular type of user requires the information?
- How can we provide the user with the information best suited to their needs?
What is the objective of general purpose financial reporting and what type of information do they need?
- To provide financial information about the reporting entity that is useful to existing and potential investors, lenders and other creditors in making decisions about providing resources to the entity. (CF 2010 OB2)
- They need Information to help them assess the prospects for future net cash inflows to an entity (CF 2010 OB3)
Describe the different types of measurement bases?
- Historical cost
- An asset is recorded at the amount of cash paid to acquire it at the acquisition date.
- Liabilities are recorded at the amount of proceeds received in exchange for the obligation
- Mostly used and a reliable way to measure but not relevant. A inventory can be thought to be useful for five years even though it will produce relevance to the corporate. This even though it does not give any further costs.
- Current cost
- Assets are carried at the amount of that would have to be paid if the same or an equivalent asset was acquired currently
- Liabilities are carried at the undiscounted amount of cash that would be required to settle the obligation currently
- Often referred to as replacement cost
- How much does it cost to rebut the inventory?
- Realizable (settlement) value
- Assets are carried at the amount of cash that could currently be obtained by selling the asset in an orderly disposal
- Liabilities are carried at their settlement values; that is, the undiscounted amounts of cash expected to be paid to satisfy the liabilities
- Can be the same as the current cost but it is how much will we get, exit value. What will we get if we sell it?
- Present value
- Assets are carried at the present discounted value of the future net cash inflows that the item is expected to generate
- Liabilities are carried at the present discounted value of the future net cash outflows that are expected to be required to settle the liabilities
- If we have this inventory what is the present value?
- Fair value
- Is not part of the CF. It is therefore not a measurement bases, not consider costs to sell.
- The price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (IFRS 13 § 9)
What is the definition of deprival value?
Deprival value has been defined in Basis for Conclusions (BC) as a value that represents the loss that an entity would suffer if it were deprived of the asset being measured. Deprival value is the lower of the replacement cost of an asset and its recoverable amount. The asset’s recoverable amount is the higher of its net realizable value and its value in use (Macve, 2010).
The lower of:
- Replacement cost
- Recoverable amount
The higher of:
- Fair value less costs to sell (disposal value)
- Value in use (value obtainable from use)
What is measurement and how is it described in the conceptual framework?
- Measurement is the process of determining the monetary amounts at which the elements of the financial statements are to be recognised and carried in the balance sheet and income statement. However, there is not much guidance on measurement in the conceptual frameworks of any of the leading standard-setters, such as FASB, IASB or ASB (Barth, 2007; Van Zilj and Wittington, 2006).
Which are two of the main competitors of how current value should be defined and measured?
Two of the main competitors within this area are fair value measurement and deprival value (Van Zilj and Wittington, 2006).
when is deprival value used?
Deprival value is usually used when the fair value of an asset cannot be reliably estimated.
Why is Macve not a supporter of deprival value?
Macve (2010), however, disagrees with BC and says that even though its initial definition of deprival value is correct, it gives only ‘kindergarten’ version of deprival value that does not address generally more complex versions applicable to long-lived assets and liabilities.
What are the criticism of Fair value?
- The criticism of using fair value measurement is directed towards reliability issues, it is stated that market actors use different concepts of reliability which in turn may threaten the relevance for accounting (Power, 2010; Barth, 2007).
- concerns regarding the lack of a clear definition of fair value (Barth, 2007).
- Van Zilj and Wittington (2006) state that two problems with fair value exist in the way that it does not address transaction costs and the choice of market which could suggest a need for extension of the fair value concept.
Measurement of fair values
What is the four step process?
- Determine the asset or liability that is to be measured
- Determine the valuation premise that is appropriate
- Determine the principal or most advantageous market
- Determine the appropriate valuation technique
Describe Step 1: determine the asset or liability
- Involves considering characteristics that market participants would take into account when pricing an asset or liability
- Relevant questions to consider include:
- What is the location of the asset?
- transport costs?
- What is the condition of the asset?
- remaining useful life etc
- Are there any restrictions on sale or use of the asset?
- patents etc
- Is the asset a stand-alone asset or used in a group of assets?
- cash generating unit
Note: assets are measured on a “per unit basis”
blockage factors are not relevant!
Describe Step 2: determine the appropriate valuation premise
Fair value is measured by considering the highest and best use of an asset:
* “…the use of a non-financial asset by market participants that would maximize the value of the asset or the group of assets … within which the asset would be used.”
- These uses must be:
- physically possible
- legally permissible and
- financially feasible
- The highest and best use is from the perspective of the market participant, not the holder
- Two different valuation premises:
- In combination valuation premise:
- This premise is used for determining FV where market participants would obtain maximum benefit principally through using the asset in combination with other assets and liabilities as a group
- The asset will be sold as an individual asset, not as a group, but the asset will be used by the market participant in conjunction with other assets
- Stand-alone valuation premise:
- FV is determined under this premise where market participants would obtain maximum benefit principally through using the asset on a stand-alone basis
Describe Step 3: determine the principal or most advantageous market
FV measurement assumes that the transaction takes place in:
* the principal market, or * the most advantageous market
- Principal market:
- The market with the greatest volume
- The market with the highest level of activity
- Most advantageous market:
- The market that would maximize the amount received/paid
- after deducting transaction and transport costs
- The market that would maximize the amount received/paid
Describe Step 4: Determine the appropriate valuation technique
- The objective of the valuation technique selected:
- To estimate the price at which orderly transactions would take place between market participants under current market conditions
- Three possible valuation techniques:
- The market approach
- The cost approach
- The income approach
It requires judgment to select the most appropriate technique for the situation
Describe the market approach within step 4 - Determine the appropriate valuation technique
The market approach:
- Uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or similar assets or liabilities
- Prices are obtained directly from information gathered by activities in markets
Describe the cost approach within step 4 - Determine the appropriate valuation technique
The cost approach
- This valuation technique reflects the amount that would be required currently to replace the service capacity of the asset
- Current replacement cost
Describe the income approach within step 4 - Determine the appropriate valuation technique
The income approach
- This valuation technique convert future amounts to a single current amount
- Discounted cash flows (or income and expenses)
- Current expectations by market participant of these future amounts
IFRS 13 provides a fair value hierarchy of inputs to achieve consistency and comparability, which are the inputs?
- Level 1
- quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
- Level 2
- inputs other than quoted prices observable for the asset or liability (directly or indirectly)
- Level 3
- unobservable inputs for the asset or liability
Describe Level 1 inputs:
Level 1 inputs:
- “…quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity can access at the measurement date.”
- A market is not active if:
- there are few recent transactions, or
- price quotes vary substantially over time
- Level 1 inputs must be for identical items
- Classical example: marketable securities
- For buildings, items may be similar, but will not be identical
Describe Level 2 inputs:
Level 2 inputs:
- “…inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.”
- Included within this definition are:
- Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets
- Quoted prices for identical items in inactive markets
- Inputs other than quoted prices observable for the asset or liability, ex:
- Interest rates & yield curves, volatilities, prepayment speeds, credit risks - Inputs that are derived from or corroborated by observable market data