Term 2 Week 10: Oligopoly Flashcards
(42 cards)
What are differences in strategy in different market structures (2)
-In a monopoly or perfectly competitive market, there are no strategic interactions
-When we have a handful of dominant firms, then we must consider the impact of strategic interaction
What are 2 common ways to measure market power in an industry (2,2)
-The Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) measures the sum of market shares squared
-For the HHI, 1800 or above are seen as very concentrated
-Concentration ratio’s measure the % of total sales coming from the top n firms
-Typically, oligopolies are where the CR4 > 60%
What does the Cournot model explain (2)
-The Cournot model explores how firms would compete in a market where prices are determined by total output
-How do firms compete in an oligopolistic industry
What are the assumptions made in the Cournot model (4)
-Products are homogeneous
-Firms pick their output
-Prices are identical and determined by the output produced
-Firms can’t commit to producing a certain output (by moving first for example)
How can you set up a basic set up of the Cournot model (4)
-A basic set up has 2 firms selecting output levels, where firm I picks qi ≥ 0, and firm j picks qj ≥ 0
-The market price for the good depends on total output Q = qi + qj
-There is only a marginal cost of c, with no fixed costs
-Profit is therefore πi = P(Q)qi - cqi
What are the three ingredients in the Cournot model (3)
-2 players: firms i and j
-Possible strategies qi ≥ 0, qj ≥ 0
-Payoff is profit:πi = P(qi + qj)qi - cqi, πj = P(qi + qj)qj - cqj
How can we plug the linear demand curve into the profit function in the Cournot Model (2)
Remember πi = Pqi - cqi
-πi = (A-b(qi + qj))qi - cqi
-The other firm’s output lowers the price we get, and hence our optimal qi
How can we draw firm i’s profits as a function of qj in the cournot model (3,2)
-Draw a graph with output (qi) on the x axis, profit (πi) on the y axis
-Draw many concave curves, all starting from (0,0) and all within each other
-The highest curve will be qj = 0, and as firm j’s quantity rises, you shift inwards in curves
-The maximum profit for firm i is where their gradient = 0, and as you can see, their best output level depends on how much firm q produces
-As qj rises, qi falls, and as does maximum profit
How can we find the profit maximising quantity for firm i in the cournot model (5,1)
-max qiP(qi + qj) - cqi
-Subbing in the linear inverse demand P(qi + qj) = (A-b(qi + qj)) gives us πi = qi(A-b(qi + qj)) - cqi
-Rearranging gives us πi = -bqi2 + qi(A - bqj - c)
-∂πi/∂qi = -2bqi + (A - bqj - c) = 0
-BRi(qj) = 1/2((A-c)/b - qj) (make qi the subject)
What is firm i’s best response profit function in the cournot model, and what does this tell us (1, 2, 4)
-BRi(qj) = 1/2((A-c)/b - qj)
-This function is decreasing in qj
-There is no dominant strategy in the game, as our best response is dependent on what the other player picks
-The more our competitor produces, the less we should
-The higher our cost (c), the lower we should produce
-If inverse demand shifts out (A) increases, we produce more (if we have a larger market)
-If the inverse demand curve is steeper (b increases) we produce less
How can we draw the best response curves for firms i and j in the Cournot model (1,2,2)
-Put qi on the x axis, and qj on the y axis
-qm = A-C/2b is the monopoly output level, how much a firm would produce if the other firm produced nothing (for firm i, this is the x intercept)
-qZP = A-C/b is where the optimal output level is 0, when we’re indifferent between producing nothing and leaving the market (for firm i, this is the y intercept)
-The intersection is the outcome where both firms play their best responses
-This intersection qic is the Nash equilibrium
What are the two best response quantity equations in the Cournot model (2)
-qi = (1/2)[(A-c/b)-qj]
-qj = (1/2)[(A-c/b)-qi]
How can we find the equation for the intersection of the best response quantities in the cournot model (5)
-qi = (1/2)[(A-c/b)-qj], -qj = (1/2)[(A-c/b)-qi]
-qi = (1/2)[(A-c/b)-(1/2)((A-c)/b - qi))]
-qi = 1/4((A-c)/b + qi)
-4qi = ((A-c)/b + qi)
-qi = qj = (A-c)/3b
How can we draw the cournot outputs, and the profit maximising/minimising level (1,3)
-Draw the diagram with qi on the x axis, and qj on the y axis
-The industry’s optimal profit maximising level occurs on the line between qM for both firms, and the price determines how it is split
-If the industry is producing on the line between qZP for both firms, industry profit is 0, below it profit > 0, above it profit < 0
-The nash equilibrium is not maximum profit in the industry, as they are competing
How can we work out profit levels for firms in the cournot model (4)
-qi = qj = (A-c)/3b
-Q = qi + qj = 2(A-c)/3b
-πi = (p-c)qi = (A-b(2(A-c)/3b)-c)(A-c)/3b
-πi = (A-c)2/9b
What are the efficiency properties in the cournot model (4)
-Total surplus is maximised where marginal social benefit = marginal social cost
-P = MC
-A - bQ = c
-Q = (A-c)/b = qZP
How can we graphically represent monopolies not being socially optimal (2,2,3)
-Draw a monopoly diagram, with Q on the x axis, P on the y axis
-Draw a horizontal MC curve, a downwards linear sloping D = AR curve, and a downwards linear sloping MR curve twice as steep as an AR curve
-Socially optimum output would be QZP, where D = MC at (A-c)/b
-However, QM is where MR = MC at (1/2)(A-c)/b
-CS is the area to the left of QM, above the price and below the AR curve
-PS is the area to the left of Qm, below the price and above MC
-DWL is all the area above MC and below AR which is not part of CS and PS
How can we graphically represent DWL in the cournot case (2,3,3,2)
-Draw a monopoly diagram, with Q on the x axis, P on the y axis
-Draw a horizontal MC curve and a downwards linear sloping D = AR curve
-Socially optimum output would be QZP, where D = MC at (A-c)/b
-However, QC is at (2/3)(A-c)/b
-CS is the area to the left of QC, above the price and below the AR curve
-PS is the area to the left of QC, below the price and above MC
-DWL is all the area above MC and below AR which is not part of CS and PS
-In the cournot case, there is less DWL than in a monopoly, due to increased competition
-There is also increased CS and decreased PS
How can we introduce isoprofit curves into the cournot model (3,5)
-The isoprofit curves ask the question which combinations of qi and qj give the same profit
-πi = (A-b(qi + qj)-c)qi = k
-K is a number, and varying k gives a different isoprofit curve
-Draw a diagram with qi on the x axis, and qj on the y axis
-Draw 2 best response curves, BRj(qi) being downwards sloping with a y intercept, and BRi(qj) having a x intercept, and sloping upwards to the left (both linear)
-Then draw our isoprofit curves, concave on the x axis
-The isoprofit we will be on is the one which intersects the NE (where the 2 BR curves intercept)
-The lower down on the isoprofits, the better for i
How can we draw each firms’ isoprofit curves in the cournot model, and then the pareto improvement area (2,3)
-Draw a graph with qi on the x axis, and qj on the y axis
-Draw each firms isoprofit curve, concave from the x axis for firm i, (this one = blue curve) concave from the y axis for firm j (this one = green curve)
-The area below the blue curve is better for i, and the area behind the green curve is better for j
-The area inbetween the 2 curves (the 2 curves intersect twice) is the pareto improvement area (for the firms)
-Within this area the QM curve (connecting both firms’ QM) should go through this point
How in the cournot model can we diagramatically represent collusion (2,3)
-Draw a graph with qi on the x axis, and qj on the y axis
-Draw each firms isoprofit curve, concave from the x axis for firm i, (this one = blue curve) concave from the y axis for firm j (this one = green curve)
-This case of isoprofits in the cournot model is similar to the prisoners dilemma in terms that the NE is not pareto efficient, so by collusion, they could reach the outcome
-This is done by pushing the isoprofits together so that they are tangential on the QM line
-However, this collusion will need to be forced as it is not stable
How can we drop the assumption of entry barriers in the Cournot model (2,2,2,3,3)
-If we drop the assumption of entry barriers, new firms can join the market
-If we allow entry, there is now N total producers
-Call the total quantity produced Q = qi + Σqj
-The price is the same as before: p = A - bQ
-The profit function is πi = (A - bQ - c)qi
-(∂πi/∂qi) = -bqi + (A - bQ - c) = 0
-When firms are identical, the result of Cournot models are always symmetric: qiC = qjC = q
-Now let Q = nq, if we assume all firms are identical
-(∂πi/∂qi) = -bq + (A - bNq - c) = 0
-q = (A-c)/b(N+1)
-p = A - (N(A-c))/(N+1)
-πi = (A-c)2/(b(N+1)2)
What happens when N -> ∞ in the Cournot model (3, 3)
-q = (A-c)/b(N+1)
-p = A - (N(A-c))/(N+1)
-πi = (A-c)2/(b(N+1)2)
As n -> ∞
-p -> c
-πi -> 0
-This shows how entry barriers are a source of profit
How can we adapt the profit functions in the cournot model to different marginal costs, fixed costs of production and imperfect substitutes (1,2,1,1)
Normally:
-πi = (A-bQ)qi - ciqi
Different marginal costs:
-πi = (A-bQ)qi - ciqi
-πj = (A-bQ)qj - cjqj
Fixed cost of production:
-πi = (A-bQ)qi - ciqi - F
Products can be imperfect substitutes:
πi = (A-bqi - γbqj)qi - cqi
j < pi -Where either c = pi < pj, c = pj < pi or c < pi = pj -Where c = pi = pj
j < pi is a NE in the bertrand game (3,2,2)