Term 2 Week 10: Oligopoly Flashcards

(42 cards)

1
Q

What are differences in strategy in different market structures (2)

A

-In a monopoly or perfectly competitive market, there are no strategic interactions
-When we have a handful of dominant firms, then we must consider the impact of strategic interaction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are 2 common ways to measure market power in an industry (2,2)

A

-The Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) measures the sum of market shares squared
-For the HHI, 1800 or above are seen as very concentrated

-Concentration ratio’s measure the % of total sales coming from the top n firms
-Typically, oligopolies are where the CR4 > 60%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does the Cournot model explain (2)

A

-The Cournot model explores how firms would compete in a market where prices are determined by total output
-How do firms compete in an oligopolistic industry

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the assumptions made in the Cournot model (4)

A

-Products are homogeneous
-Firms pick their output
-Prices are identical and determined by the output produced
-Firms can’t commit to producing a certain output (by moving first for example)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How can you set up a basic set up of the Cournot model (4)

A

-A basic set up has 2 firms selecting output levels, where firm I picks qi ≥ 0, and firm j picks qj ≥ 0
-The market price for the good depends on total output Q = qi + qj
-There is only a marginal cost of c, with no fixed costs
-Profit is therefore πi = P(Q)qi - cqi

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the three ingredients in the Cournot model (3)

A

-2 players: firms i and j
-Possible strategies qi ≥ 0, qj ≥ 0
-Payoff is profit:πi = P(qi + qj)qi - cqi, πj = P(qi + qj)qj - cqj

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How can we plug the linear demand curve into the profit function in the Cournot Model (2)

A

Remember πi = Pqi - cqi
i = (A-b(qi + qj))qi - cqi
-The other firm’s output lowers the price we get, and hence our optimal qi

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How can we draw firm i’s profits as a function of qj in the cournot model (3,2)

A

-Draw a graph with output (qi) on the x axis, profit (πi) on the y axis
-Draw many concave curves, all starting from (0,0) and all within each other
-The highest curve will be qj = 0, and as firm j’s quantity rises, you shift inwards in curves

-The maximum profit for firm i is where their gradient = 0, and as you can see, their best output level depends on how much firm q produces
-As qj rises, qi falls, and as does maximum profit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How can we find the profit maximising quantity for firm i in the cournot model (5,1)

A

-max qiP(qi + qj) - cqi
-Subbing in the linear inverse demand P(qi + qj) = (A-b(qi + qj)) gives us πi = qi(A-b(qi + qj)) - cqi
-Rearranging gives us πi = -bqi2 + qi(A - bqj - c)
-∂πi/∂qi = -2bqi + (A - bqj - c) = 0

-BRi(qj) = 1/2((A-c)/b - qj) (make qi the subject)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is firm i’s best response profit function in the cournot model, and what does this tell us (1, 2, 4)

A

-BRi(qj) = 1/2((A-c)/b - qj)

-This function is decreasing in qj
-There is no dominant strategy in the game, as our best response is dependent on what the other player picks

-The more our competitor produces, the less we should
-The higher our cost (c), the lower we should produce
-If inverse demand shifts out (A) increases, we produce more (if we have a larger market)
-If the inverse demand curve is steeper (b increases) we produce less

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How can we draw the best response curves for firms i and j in the Cournot model (1,2,2)

A

-Put qi on the x axis, and qj on the y axis

-qm = A-C/2b is the monopoly output level, how much a firm would produce if the other firm produced nothing (for firm i, this is the x intercept)
-qZP = A-C/b is where the optimal output level is 0, when we’re indifferent between producing nothing and leaving the market (for firm i, this is the y intercept)

-The intersection is the outcome where both firms play their best responses
-This intersection qic is the Nash equilibrium

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the two best response quantity equations in the Cournot model (2)

A

-qi = (1/2)[(A-c/b)-qj]
-qj = (1/2)[(A-c/b)-qi]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How can we find the equation for the intersection of the best response quantities in the cournot model (5)

A

-qi = (1/2)[(A-c/b)-qj], -qj = (1/2)[(A-c/b)-qi]
-qi = (1/2)[(A-c/b)-(1/2)((A-c)/b - qi))]
-qi = 1/4((A-c)/b + qi)
-4qi = ((A-c)/b + qi)
-qi = qj = (A-c)/3b

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How can we draw the cournot outputs, and the profit maximising/minimising level (1,3)

A

-Draw the diagram with qi on the x axis, and qj on the y axis

-The industry’s optimal profit maximising level occurs on the line between qM for both firms, and the price determines how it is split
-If the industry is producing on the line between qZP for both firms, industry profit is 0, below it profit > 0, above it profit < 0
-The nash equilibrium is not maximum profit in the industry, as they are competing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How can we work out profit levels for firms in the cournot model (4)

A

-qi = qj = (A-c)/3b
-Q = qi + qj = 2(A-c)/3b
i = (p-c)qi = (A-b(2(A-c)/3b)-c)(A-c)/3b
i = (A-c)2/9b

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the efficiency properties in the cournot model (4)

A

-Total surplus is maximised where marginal social benefit = marginal social cost
-P = MC
-A - bQ = c
-Q = (A-c)/b = qZP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

How can we graphically represent monopolies not being socially optimal (2,2,3)

A

-Draw a monopoly diagram, with Q on the x axis, P on the y axis
-Draw a horizontal MC curve, a downwards linear sloping D = AR curve, and a downwards linear sloping MR curve twice as steep as an AR curve

-Socially optimum output would be QZP, where D = MC at (A-c)/b
-However, QM is where MR = MC at (1/2)(A-c)/b

-CS is the area to the left of QM, above the price and below the AR curve
-PS is the area to the left of Qm, below the price and above MC
-DWL is all the area above MC and below AR which is not part of CS and PS

18
Q

How can we graphically represent DWL in the cournot case (2,3,3,2)

A

-Draw a monopoly diagram, with Q on the x axis, P on the y axis
-Draw a horizontal MC curve and a downwards linear sloping D = AR curve

-Socially optimum output would be QZP, where D = MC at (A-c)/b
-However, QC is at (2/3)(A-c)/b

-CS is the area to the left of QC, above the price and below the AR curve
-PS is the area to the left of QC, below the price and above MC
-DWL is all the area above MC and below AR which is not part of CS and PS

-In the cournot case, there is less DWL than in a monopoly, due to increased competition
-There is also increased CS and decreased PS

19
Q

How can we introduce isoprofit curves into the cournot model (3,5)

A

-The isoprofit curves ask the question which combinations of qi and qj give the same profit
i = (A-b(qi + qj)-c)qi = k
-K is a number, and varying k gives a different isoprofit curve

-Draw a diagram with qi on the x axis, and qj on the y axis
-Draw 2 best response curves, BRj(qi) being downwards sloping with a y intercept, and BRi(qj) having a x intercept, and sloping upwards to the left (both linear)
-Then draw our isoprofit curves, concave on the x axis
-The isoprofit we will be on is the one which intersects the NE (where the 2 BR curves intercept)
-The lower down on the isoprofits, the better for i

20
Q

How can we draw each firms’ isoprofit curves in the cournot model, and then the pareto improvement area (2,3)

A

-Draw a graph with qi on the x axis, and qj on the y axis
-Draw each firms isoprofit curve, concave from the x axis for firm i, (this one = blue curve) concave from the y axis for firm j (this one = green curve)

-The area below the blue curve is better for i, and the area behind the green curve is better for j
-The area inbetween the 2 curves (the 2 curves intersect twice) is the pareto improvement area (for the firms)
-Within this area the QM curve (connecting both firms’ QM) should go through this point

21
Q

How in the cournot model can we diagramatically represent collusion (2,3)

A

-Draw a graph with qi on the x axis, and qj on the y axis
-Draw each firms isoprofit curve, concave from the x axis for firm i, (this one = blue curve) concave from the y axis for firm j (this one = green curve)

-This case of isoprofits in the cournot model is similar to the prisoners dilemma in terms that the NE is not pareto efficient, so by collusion, they could reach the outcome
-This is done by pushing the isoprofits together so that they are tangential on the QM line
-However, this collusion will need to be forced as it is not stable

22
Q

How can we drop the assumption of entry barriers in the Cournot model (2,2,2,3,3)

A

-If we drop the assumption of entry barriers, new firms can join the market
-If we allow entry, there is now N total producers

-Call the total quantity produced Q = qi + Σqj
-The price is the same as before: p = A - bQ

-The profit function is πi = (A - bQ - c)qi
-(∂πi/∂qi) = -bqi + (A - bQ - c) = 0

-When firms are identical, the result of Cournot models are always symmetric: qiC = qjC = q
-Now let Q = nq, if we assume all firms are identical
-(∂πi/∂qi) = -bq + (A - bNq - c) = 0

-q = (A-c)/b(N+1)
-p = A - (N(A-c))/(N+1)
i = (A-c)2/(b(N+1)2)

23
Q

What happens when N -> ∞ in the Cournot model (3, 3)

A

-q = (A-c)/b(N+1)
-p = A - (N(A-c))/(N+1)
i = (A-c)2/(b(N+1)2)

As n -> ∞
-p -> c
i -> 0
-This shows how entry barriers are a source of profit

24
Q

How can we adapt the profit functions in the cournot model to different marginal costs, fixed costs of production and imperfect substitutes (1,2,1,1)

A

Normally:
i = (A-bQ)qi - ciqi

Different marginal costs:
i = (A-bQ)qi - ciqi
j = (A-bQ)qj - cjqj

Fixed cost of production:
i = (A-bQ)qi - ciqi - F

Products can be imperfect substitutes:
πi = (A-bqi - γbqj)qi - cqi

25
Why does Bertand criticise the Cournot model (1)
-Bertrand argues quantity competition is not realistic, as firms usually pick prices
26
What are the assumptions of the Bertrand model (5)
-Products are homogeneous -Firms pick prices -Buyers know all prices and buy from the cheapest firm -Firms compete just once and pick prices without observing the other's decision -No fixed cost and constant marginal cost
27
What is the demand function in the Bertrand model (1,3,1)
-If one firm has lower price pi < pj, then market price is p = pi qi(pi, pj) = -Q(p) if pi < pj -Q(p)/2 if pi = pj -0 if pi > pj -This is where Q(p) couold be Q(p) = A - bp
28
How can we draw the demand function for a firm i in the bertrand model (1,3)
-Draw pi on the x axis, qi on the y axis -For pi < pj, draw a normal downward sloping linear demand curve -For pij, demand suddenly drops to a half as they share the market -For pi > pj, there is no demand curve
29
How do we usually find the Nash Equilibria, and why can't we do this in the Bertrand model (3,3)
-Put all the payoffs in a matrix and find the best response -Differentiate the profit function -Iterate on the best responses Reasons for not working: -Matrix = not possible, as price being continuous means there is unlimited information -Differentiate = not possible, function is not continuous -Iterate = may work, but not sure if will go to equilibrium or move in circles
30
How can we find the nash equilibrium in the Bertrand model (1,4)
-Split the model into a number of cases and see if players are playing best responses These responses are: -Where either pi or pj < c -Where either c < pi < pj or cj < pi -Where either c = pi < pj, c = pj < pi or c < pi = pj -Where c = pi = pj
31
How can we diagramatically analyse where either pi or pj < c is a NE in the bertrand game (3,1,2)
-Draw a diagram with pi on the x axis, pj on the y axis -Now draw a 45 degree upward sloping linear line from the origin, where pi = pj -Then draw a point where pi = c, pj = c, and draw those dashed lines from the origin -For the case where either pi or pj < c, fill in the areas to the left of pi = c, and below pj = c -This is not a best response, as pricing below cost means they are making a loss -Either they both share the market and both lose, or one firm takes the whole market and would want to raise prices (incentive to change = not a NE)
32
How can we diagramatically analyse where either c < pi < pj or cj < pi is a NE in the bertrand game (3,2,2)
-Draw a diagram with pi on the x axis, pj on the y axis -Now draw a 45 degree upward sloping linear line from the origin, where pi = pj -Then draw a point where pi = c, pj = c, and draw those dashed lines from the origin -For pi < pj, fill in the triangle to the left of the pi = pj line, above both pi = c and pj = c -For pi > pj, fill in the triangle to the right of the pi = pj line, above both pi = c and pj = c -This is not a nash equilibrium -For the left triangle, player j has an incentive to cut prices to recieve demand
33
How can we diagramatically analyse where either c = pi < pj, c = pj < pi or c < pi = pj is a NE in the bertrand game (3,3,3)
-Draw a diagram with pi on the x axis, pj on the y axis -Now draw a 45 degree upward sloping linear line from the origin, where pi = pj -Then draw a point where pi = c, pj = c, and draw those dashed lines from the origin -For c = pi < pj, colour in the c = pi line above pj = c -For c = pj < pi, colour in the c = pj line above pi = c -For c < pi = pj, colour in the pj = pi line above the intersection point -This is not a Nash equilibrium -For the firm pricing above cost, they have nothing to change -However, for the firm pricing at cost, they would want to bump up prices a little bit
34
How can we diagramatically analyse where either c = pi = pj is a NE in the bertrand model (3,1,3)
-Draw a diagram with pi on the x axis, pj on the y axis -Now draw a 45 degree upward sloping linear line from the origin, where pi = pj -Then draw a point where pi = c, pj = c, and draw those dashed lines from the origin -c = pi = pj is the intersection point between all 3 dashed lines -This is the NE, as neither firm can improve -Lowering price means the firms make a loss -Increasing prices mean they lose all market demand
35
What are the differences in profit in the cournot and bertrand model, and what is the bertrand paradox (4)
-Two firms competing on price (bertrand model) make zero profit, but two firms competing on quantity (cournot model) make positive profit -This is because firms produce at marginal cost in the Bertrand model, but not in the Cournot model -This is known as the Bertrand paradox -This is a surplus maximising outcome, as we get social efficiency without needing free entry or a large N value
36
Why does the switch to price setting make a difference (1,3)
-Firms in the Bertrand model have much stronger incentives to compete, and the power to do so easily -If we marginally undercut, we take the whole market in the bertrand model -If we marginally increase q in the Cournot model, the benefits are smaller -In the Bertrand model, the firms control the variables demanders care about (price)
37
How can we remove the assumption that products are identical (2,3)
-In Bertrand, the products are identical, and thus the lowest price firm takes the whole market -A new assumption which can be made is that products are imperfect substitutes -qi(pi, pj) = A - bpi + (b/2)pj -qj(pj, pi) = A - bpj + (b/2)pi -A firms demand is more responsive to their price than their competitors, but demand is no longer infinitely elastic
38
What is the profit function in the bertrand model once products are imperfect substitutes (2,3,2)
i = piqi(pi, pj) - cqi(pi, pj) -πi = (pi - c)(A - bpi + (b/2)pj) -Since the payoff function is differentiable, we can now find the BR this way -∂πi/∂pi = A - bpi + (b/2)pj - bpi + bc = 0 -A + (b/2)pj + bc = 2bpi The best response functions then become: -pi = (1/2)(A/b + (1/2)(pj + c) -pj = (1/2)(A/b + (1/2)(pi + c)
39
How can we draw the best response diagrams in the Bertrand model with imperfect substitutes (1,2,3,2)
-Put pi on the x axis, and pj on the y axis -Draw the BRi(pj) curve, upward linear sloping from the x axis -Draw the BRj(pi) curve, upward linear sloping from the y axis -Start from point (c,c) (below the x and y intercept) -Overtime, through drawing this point moving from one diagram to the other, the NE will be tended to -NE = where BRi(pj) = BRj(pi) at pi* = pj* -Actions are strategic complements, as both BR curves slope upwards -The higher one firm prices, the higher the other wants to price
40
How do we find the NE in the bertrand model with imperfect substitutes mathematically (1,1,2,1)
-To find the NE mathematically, we solve the 2 best response functions simultaneously -As this is a symmetric equilibrium, we assume the 2 prices are the same -pi = (1/2)(A/b + (1/2)(pj + c) -pj = (1/2)(A/b + (1/2)(pi + c) -pi* = pj* = (2/3)(A/b + c)
41
What are the differences in profit levels in Cournot and Bertrand modelling (2,1)
-In Cournot, profitability is higher in markets with more concentration of market power -In Bertrand, profitability is low even with only 2 firms -This thus makes implications for welfare and competition policy
42
What are the different types of oligopoly model (2,1)
Oligopoly models are typically either: -Quantity setting (Cournot) -Price setting (Bertrand) -The differences in the predictions of the baseline models will narrow if we allow for product differentiation