Term 3 Test Flashcards

1
Q

Criteria for whether an accessory thing has become immovable / acceded to the land (as per Macdonald)

A
  1. Nature and purpose of attachment. Requires accessory thing to be capable of permanent attachment to principal thing
  2. degree and manner of attachment
  3. subjective intention of annexor
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Konstanz

A

Components not impossible to remove and the other party had expressly reserved ownership. Court felt that the INTENTION of the owner of the movable PREVAILED and thus accession did not take place.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Dreyer

A

Shows requirements for a real agreement. Must have authority to transfer ownership - here authority was not present and therefore there was no intention either.

[REAL AGREEMENT; AUTHORITY]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Legator Mckenna

A

McKenna did have authority, therefore legal cause is valid. Applies to movables and immovables.
Where fraud / misrepresentation taints a transaction ownership may not transfer.
Regardless of whether contract of sale was valid or not, there was a real agreement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Quartermark investments v Pinky

A

ownership will not pass if transaction is tainted by fraud (even though registration may have taken place)
Fraud = invalid real agreement.
court must always, in case of invalid obligatory agreement, determine whether invalid obligatory agreement has the consequence that parties dont intend to transfer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Groenewald v Van Der Merwe

A

Emphasises importance of pointing the property out and inspecting it when long hand delivery is taking place.
groenewald clearly hadnt sufficient mental attitude: he did not intend there and then to acquire and exercise control over the thing as his own
van der merwe had explicitly walked around machine in presence of transferor stating machine was henceforth his - showing necessary mental attitude.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Oriental products

A

mr qu did not having capax to transfer ownership but oriental lost right of ownership through estoppel.

Sets out requirements for valid reliance on estoppel: misrepresentation and negligence.

Oriental negligently misrepresented sitch to 2nd purchaser and world at large that the registration of transfer in deeds office was true reflection of state of affairs. thus true owner estopped from vindicating ownership.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Requirements of derivative acquisition of ownership

A

real agreement and conveyance

thus owner must intend to transfer ownership to buyer, buyer must intend to acquire ownership, buyer must effect payment in regard to thing, seller must deliver thing to buyer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

If a sale is for cash, when does ownership transfer?

A

upon payment and delivery with a real agreement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

If a sale is for credit, when does ownership transfer?

A

ownership transfers upon delivery with a real agreement - no payment necessary at that time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

requirements of estoppel

A
  1. Misrepresentation by owner through conduct or otherwise that the other person was owner of it or entitled to dispose of it.
  2. Representation must have been relied upon by person raising estoppel and such reliance must have been the proximate cause of his detriment
  3. person raising estoppel must have acted to his detriment
  4. must have been fault on part of person making representation.

[Misrepresentation + conduct; detrimentally relied upon misrepresentation; act to detriment; fault]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Requirements for accession

A

Must first determine whether joined things are movable / immovable
Whether there has been a join between 2+ things for composite.
join must be permanent and sufficient
must be possible to identify principal and accessory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Appropriation

A

Currently unowned property capable of private ownership - either never been owned or used to be owned but subsequently abandoned. Must be corpus and animus.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Authority for movables to movables + what does this authority tell us?

A

Khan. Says thing that gives the composite thing its character, form and function is the principal thing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Manufacture

A

New product from items wholly / in part belonging to someone else. Maker will acquire ownership and previous owner has a claim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Acquisition of frutis

A

reverse accession - separation required. separation is when fruits gain separate legal identity. Owner of the principal is owner of fruits upon separation.

17
Q

Mixing and mingling

A

similar things of + - same value belonging to different owners are mixed / mingles without CONSENT and become inseparable or indeterminable. Liquids must be mixed in container.

Consequence of mingling: co owned in undivided shared - each owners portion must be legally SEPARATED before it can be vindicated.

Mixing: ownership cannot change. each owner may vindicate proportionate share.

Corpus = inseparable / indeterminable; animus = inferred.

18
Q

Prescription

A

Open and uninterrupted possession of property - acquirer must have possessed for an uninterrupted 30 years. Prescription act applies from periods following 1 December 1970

19
Q

expropriation

A

ownership acquired by state.

20
Q

Inaedificatio: what must attachment indicate?

A

Must indicate PERMANENCY, take into account the NATURE and PURPOSE of movable, MANNER and DEGREE of attachment