Termination of covenants Flashcards Preview

Property II > Termination of covenants > Flashcards

Flashcards in Termination of covenants Deck (28):
1

Cowling v. Colligan (TX)

facts: Colligan (defendant) proposed to use a subdivision lot restricted by covenants for commercial purposes. Cowling (plaintiff) represented a class of subdivision property owners seeking a declaratory judgment as to the validity and enforceability of a covenant prohibiting the use of subdivision property for anything other than residential purposes.
rule:the court must consider the detriment to other subdivision property owners when determining whether to exempt a particular parcel from the operation of a restrictive covenant.

2

Ways to terminate a real covenant (get out of it and allow lot to be developed commercially in Cowling v. Colligan)

-Waiver
-Changing Use doctrine
-Abandonment
-Express Termination

3

how is this different than easements?

no merger, not items of title so they don't merge (no direct way here)

4

Express Termination

-If time period given & expires (common commercially)
-voluntary release each other (uncommon)
-Law- some states require a set period of time will expressly terminate (MASS)

5

Termination by WAIVER

waived (give it up)
-where the convenantee fails to enforce the covenant (church in neighborhood example)

6

will the courts view a waiver of one use to be interpreted as a waiver for another

no. courts tend to view waiver narrowly
(ex church hypo- never enforced, so someone could put up a synagogue but not a tanning plant)

7

Termination by Abandonment

1) waive covenant AND
2) expess (obj) intent never to enforce it again
(need statement of obj intent)

8

In waiver, is enforcement possible later??

yes, after the improper use terminates

9

in abandonment is enforcement again ever possible

convenient can NEVER be enforced again

10

ex) if we abandon for churches

can never forbid churches againg

11

ex) if waive churches

once joe closes his church , can disallow churches again

12

Non-enforcement under Changing Use Doctrine

1) the use of land around the restricted lot has changed so much from the orig. req. that enforcing it is not justified.
2)change must be inside development, not outside

13

internal looking doctrine
(non-enforcement of CUD)

look inside restrictive neighborhood, not outside

14

can u have the new covenant rewritten?

no!
can enforce or not enforce. cant use doctrine to change it. (*reason why covenants need to be amended)

15

Is there a right to a decree at equity?

No. (would have to go to c/l court)

16

Does the CUD terminate a real covenant?

NO. ---just makes it unenforceable in equity

17

Does zoning normally affect any real covenents on a parcel?

NO.
(land must be used in way consistent w/zoning & the covenants)

18

what can be used to establish the applicalbility of the CUD? (application on exams)

Zoning changes

19

Does the changing use doctrine apply to easements?

NO

20

the CUD applies to ___&___-?

real covenants & equitable servitudes.

21

real covenants that violate consitutional or statutory law will ______?

NOT be enforced

22

will a state strike down a clause bases on public policy if that not policy is not expressed in the law\?

Yes, some states will

23

The states that treat real covenants like contracts will construct them ______?

BROADLY (as necessary to implement the INTENT of the parties)

24

States that treat real covenants as a restraint on alienation will construct them ____?

NARROWLY (only prohibiting that which is explicitly expressed)

25

real covenants can be subject to amendment provided the entity w/power to make amendments is ______?

perpetual
-committee
-vote of the dominant estate

26

most states require that the power to amend be used ______, _______, & ________.

-reasonably, in good faith & without arbitrary or capricious behavior.

27

Real covenants can be terminated by _____, ____ or ____?

express release, waiver of eforcement, abandonment (of or by dominant estate)

28

real covenants are made non-enforceable in equity by _________?

the changing use doctrine