Terms Flashcards

(47 cards)

1
Q

Propositions

A

Statements that can be true or false

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Arguments

A

Composed of premises and conclusions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Premises

A

Propositions that are supposed to support the conclusion (okay but what does that mean? Why tell me that? What’s the point?)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Deductive Arguements

A

Guarantee their conclusions
Mathematical, logical, Arguements from definition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Inductive Arguements

A

Supposed to make their conclusion probable
Analogies, authority, casual inferences, scientific reasoning, extrapolations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Validity

A

If premises are true, then the conclusion must be true
All pigs can fly.
Snowball is a pig.
Therefore, Snowball can fly (not sound but valid)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Sound Arguement

A

Valid and has true premises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Strength

A

Strong if inductive argument has true premises, then the conclusion is probably true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Cogency

A

Cogent Arguements is strong and has true premises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Fallacy

A

Type of bad arguement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Formal fallacies

A

Have bad structure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Informal Fallacies

A

Problem with their content

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Affirming the consequent

A

If X, then Y
Y
Therefore, X

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Denying the antecedent

A

If X, then Y
not X
therefore, not y

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Fallacy fallacy

A

When someone uses the fact that a fallacy was committed to justify rejecting the conclusion of the fallacious argument

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Begging the question

A

Occurs when one assumes the truth of the conclusion in one or more of the premises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Principle of Charity

A

An effort to interpret others’ reasoning in the best possible light

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Confirmation Bias

A

Natural tendency to seeks out evidence that supports personal beliefs and to ignore evidence that undermines those beliefs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Cognitive Bias

A

Refers to the systemic ways in which people categorize and make sense of the world to make judgements and decisions

20
Q

Alief

A

Automatic belief-like attitude that can explain how our instinctual responses can conflict with our reasoned-out beliefs (type of cognitive bias)

21
Q

Anchoring

A

Human tendency to stick close to the FIRST piece of information we have a about a new domain

22
Q

Heuristics

A

Rule of thumb, a ready strategy, or a shortcut

23
Q

Representativeness

A

Cognitive bias in which an individual categorizes a new situation based on nearest prototype or representative experience in their mind

24
Q

Availability

A

Cognitive bias in which an individual takes available information while not seeking out or considering unknown information resulting in a person jumping to conclusions

25
Selection Bias
When a sample is selected in such a way that it is not representative of the target population
26
Generalization
Based on an adequate number of relevant cases
27
Decision Making
System 1 is quick, automatic, and emotional System 2 is deliberate, effortful, and calculating
28
Ad Hominem
Fallacy of relevance- committed when one attacks the person making an argument rather than argument itself
29
Genetic Fallacy
Fallacy of Relevance, committed when one argues that the origin of an idea is a reason of rejecting (or accepting) that idea
30
Straw Figure Fallacy
Fallacy of Relevance, committed when one misrepresents another’s argument then attacks the misrepresented (weaker) argument rather than the actual (stronger) argument
31
Red Herring Fallacy
Fallacy of Relevance, committed when one introduces an irrelevant topic
32
Appeal to Authority
Committed when one appeals to an unqualified authority in support of one’s claim
33
Appeal to Force Fallacy
Committed when one uses a threat to compel agreement with one’s claim
34
Appeal to Popularity Fallacy
Committed when one appeals to the popularity of a belief as a reason to affirm its truth
35
Appeal to Consequences Fallacy
Committed when one appeals to the bad (or good) consequences of accepting a claim as a reason to reject (or accept) it as true
36
Fallacy of Equivocation
Committed when one’s argument mistakenly used the same word in two different sense
37
Appeal to Ignorance Fallacy
Fallacy of Weak Induction, Committed when someone reasons from our lack of knowledge that a claim is false (or true) to the assertion the claim is true
38
Slippery Slope
Fallacy of Weak Induction, committed when someone argues, without sufficient reason, one event will lead to a series of events ultimately ending in some further event
39
Texas Sharpshooter
Fallacy of Weak Induction, committed when one selectively uses, or “cherry-picks”, only the evidence supporting their desired conclusion
40
Post Hoc
Fallacy of Weak Induction, committed when someone claims some event causes another just because the first event occurs before the second event X Occurred before Y Therefore: X caused Y
41
Hasty Generalization
Fallacy of Weak Induction, committed when someone gernalizes too quickly about a group of people, things, or events
42
False Dilemma Fallacy
Fallacy of Presumption, committed when one presumes that there are fewer options than there actually are (black and white or dichotomy)
43
Burden of Proof Shifting Fallacy
Fallacy of Presumption, committed when one presumes that one’s (implausible) claim is justified unless someone else demonstrates otherwise
44
Conclusion Indicators
Therefore, So, It follows that, Hence, Thus, Entails that, We may conclude that, Implies that, Wherefore, As a result
45
Premise Indicators
Because, For, Given that, In that, As, Since, As indicated by
46
Conclusions
Okay but why would anyone believe that? Give me a reasons or evidence for accepting that claim
47
Valid Structure
All X’s do Y Z is an X Therefore, Z does Y