Terms for midterm Flashcards

(46 cards)

1
Q

code

A

speech system two people use to communicate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

code switching

A

bilinguals between langauges

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

grammar

A

actual system that speakers know- both individual and shared knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

I language

A

mental system that characterizes a person’s linguistic range and is represented in the individual’s brain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

E language

A

part of outside world, amorphous, not a system, fluid, in flux, not systematic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

competence

A

Chomsky term- what people know about their language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

performance

A

Chomsky term- what people do with their language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

unmarked

A

considered normal/ default characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

marked

A

abnormal characteristics that stand out

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

observer’s paradox

A

goal to find out how people talk when they are not being observed but need to collect data through obvservation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

variety of language

A

set of linguistic items with similar distributions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

group

A

two or more people, group together for social, religious, etc. reasons, permanent or temporary, importance varies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

communities of practice

A

an aggregate of people who come together around mutual engagements in some common endeavor. Practices emmerge in the course of their joint activity around the endeavor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

networks

A

How and on what occasions does a specific individual A interact now with A, then with C, and again with D? How intensive are the relationships?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

dense network

A

people you know and interact with also know and interact with each other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

loose network

A

people you know and intereact with don’t know and interact with each other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

multiplex network

A

people within the network are tied together in more than one way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

speech repertoire

A

he or she controls a number of varieties of a language or two or more languages- range of linguistic varieties at disposal and which they may use as a member of speech community

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

dialect atlases

A

show geographicalboundaries of the distribution of a particular linguistic feature by drawing an isogloss

20
Q

isogloss

A

on one side of the way people say one thing and on the toehr side they use a different pronunciation

21
Q

dialect boundary

A

a large number of isoglosses in a bundle of isoglosses in the same area create a boundary which often coincides with a geographical or political factor

22
Q

focal area

A

an area which posesses a set of linguistic features which spread into neighboring locations

23
Q

relic area

A

an area which shows characteristics of being unaffected by changes spreading from neighboring areas. For example, Martha’s Vineyard

24
Q

Rhenish fan

A

isogloss bundle in Europe setting off Low German to the north from High German to the south- run from north of Berlin east west to Rhine where they fan- aline with old political boundaries

25
Transition area
area covered by isogloss fan- change is progressing in contrast to focal or relic area
26
Linguistic variable
linguistic item which hs identifiable variants. For example, in'
27
Labov 1966
- Study on New York r and th variables - Labov chose 5 variables (th, dh, r, a, and o) - used critera of education, ocucupation, and income to set up 10 social classes - used 4 types of careful speech (reading list of close pairs, reading a list of words, reading a prose passage, formal interview) and 5 types of casual speech (outside formal interview, conversation with third party, responses to questions, childhood rhymes, fatal incident) Casual speech required channel cues. Also had subjects react to taped samples - used a stratified sample- chose people for specific characteristics - amount of r use increases by social class and formality of style, exception is cross over of lower middle class to upper class people in more formal circumstances- hypercorrection - department store study- Saks (upper) Macy's (middle) S. Klein (lower) - sought out repetition of the phrase "fourth floor" - r pronunciation was favored in higher end store - repetition of the utterance increased r-pronunciation, and more r in floor than fourth - older people used r less in Saks but in S. Klein the opposite; members of the highest and lowest groups don't change their pronunciation after adolesence but middle class people do - studied variants of t,th, and tth, nonstandard directly related to social class, sharp stratification
28
Trudgill 1974
- Study on Norwich speech - three consonant variables and thirteen vowel variables- n vs ng, and t variants - used 5 social classes (MMC, LMC, UWC, MWC, LWC) 60 informants were classified on 6 factors and graded 0-5- occupation, educationm income, type of housing, locality, father's occupation and he decided the cut off points. - Required subjects to answer questions, read word lists naturally then rapidly, read word pairs, questions about specific local words, judgments about norwich speech - Higher social class more frequent use of standard variants, more standard variants with more formality, more females with standard variant
29
indicator
linguistic variable to which little or no social import is attatched- only trained observer is aware of them
30
marker
linguistic variable which carries social significance, like dropping gs on ing
31
stereotype
popular and therefore conscious characterization of the speech of a particular group- pahk the cah in Hahvahd yahd
32
hypercorrect
overextend a particular usage in order to emulate others' speech
33
Contextual styles for data collection
- Casual conversation (including speech outside interview, conversation with a third party, responses to general questions, recall of childhood, narration of stories about life in peril) - Interview conversation - Reading aloud of a story - Reading aloud of lists of words and pairs of words
34
Wolfrom 1969
- Detroit study, multiple negation - 48 black informants divided into four social classes, and each group of 12 further divided into 3 agre groups - 12 white informants from upper middle class, divided by age and sex - Very close relationship between social class and multiple negation - Children less standard than adults, males less standard than females - Gradient stratification applied to phonological variables - Sharp stratification applied to gramatical variables
35
Apparent-time studies
subjects are grouped by age and changes in behavior associated with language changes
36
Real-time studies
elicit same kind of data after period of time with same or different informants
37
Fischer 1858
- Study of the ng variable - Interviewed young children- boys used -in' more - Model vs. typical boy, model much more likely to use -ing, model more likely to use -in' in less formal environments - in' more used with verbs like hit or swim, everyday activities, and -ing more used with more formal verbs like correct or read - conclusion: choice of -ing variant relates to sex, class, personality, mood of speaker, formality of conversation, and verb spoken
38
Cheshire 1978
- Studied third person verb marking on other persons in Reading, England - Used non-standard forms with know and call on over half, non-standard has on a third, and non-standard does on a quarter, has never as an aux. - Vernacular verbs more likely to take -s ending on all forms- constraints on usage - high frequencies of s with high toughness index- more correlation with boys
39
Jahangiri 1980
- Study of Persian in Tehran - Separated by gender and education level - Hyper consistent pattern - Too perfect, shows forced nature of study
40
Milroy 1978
- Working class areas in Belfast, Northen Ireland - Importance of social networks - Vernacular norms emerge and maintain themselves in Belfast communities- perceived as signs of solidarity - Placed each participant on six point scale indicating strength of networks - correlation between network strength and variant usage on 5/8 variants - first community had greater variant variation based on network strength and gender
41
Phonemic coalescence
situations where contrast existed at one time but was later lost
42
Phonemic split
there was no contrast but a contrast developed
43
Age-grading
the phenomenon of using speech appropriate to your age group
44
real-time panel study
A survey of younger people 20-30 years later when they become middle-aged to see if they maintain the innovations
45
real-time trend study
A survey of people drawn from the same population after 20 years to see if comparable groups have changed their behavior
46
Labov 1963
- Martha's Vineyard study- dipthongs by native Vineyarders - Labov finds exaggeration of tendency to centralize first part of dipthong- characteristic of those who identify most closely with the island - Non-standardness used to show difference from summer population - Youngest generation (because they couldn't choose to live on island or not) were most ambivelent - Middle age had most commitment to island