Test 1 Flashcards
(54 cards)
logic
the systematic use of methods and principles to analyze evaluate and construct arguments
argument
a group of statements in which the conclusion is claimed to follow the premises
statement
a sentence that’s either true or false
truth value
every statement has a truth value. either true or false
proposition
the content/meaning of a statement
inferential claim
a passage makes an inferential claim when it expresses a reasoning process
explanation
uses “because” to provide reasons for how/why an event occurred. an already accepted fact
truth analysis
it concerns statements whether is it true or false. determines soundness
logical analysis
concerns arguments. the relationship between premise(s) provides the inferential strength of an argument. determines validity
deductive argument
necessarily true. if premises are true it’s impossible for the conclusion to be false
inductive argument
probably true. improbable that conclusion is false if premises are true.
valid deductive argument
when true premises lead to a true conclusion
invalid deductive argument
when premises are true and the conclusion is false
mondus ponens
if P then Q / P // therefore, Q.
Valid
ex: if today is Wednesday then I have to go to the dentist. today is Wednesday, therefore, I have to go to the dentist.
modus tollens
if P then Q / not Q // therefore not P
valid
ex: if today is Wednesday then I have to go to the dentist. I don’t have to go to the dentist today. it must not be Wednesday.
disjunctive syllogism
either P or Q / not P // therefore Q
Valid
ex: today is either Tuesday or Wednesday. it’s not Wednesday, therefore, it’s Tuesday
affirming the consequent
if P then Q / Q // P
invalid
ex: if Becky is sick, then she drinks a lot of juice. she is drinking a lot of juice, therefore, she is sick.
denying the antecedent
if P then Q / not P // therefore not Q
invalid
ex: if it is raining, then the grass is wet. It is not raining. Therefore, the grass is not wet
hypothetical syllogism
if A then B / if B then C // if A then C
Valid
ex: f world population continues to grow, then cities will become hopelessly overcrowded. If cities become hopelessly overcrowded, then pollution will become intolerable. Therefore, if the world population continues to grow, then pollution will become intolerable
constructive dilemma
if A then B or if C then D / A or C //, therefore, B or D
valid
ex: f we get a cat, then we have to deal with hairballs, and if we get a dog, then we have to deal with shedding. We must choose either a cat or a dog. Therefore, we either have to deal with hairballs or shedding
cogent inductive argument
the argument is strong and the premises are true
ex: most classes are interesting, philosophy 120 is a class. philosophy is probably a fun class
uncogent inductive argument
the argument is weak and at least 1 premise if false.
ex: It has snowed every day for the last 35 days. So it will probably be sunny today
strong inductive argument
true premises make it probable that the conclusion is true
ex: Most cats are friendly. Sophie is a cat. So she’s probably friendly
weak inductive argument
true premises make it improbable that the conclusion is true
ex: It rained twice last week. So it will rain everyday this week