Test 1 Flashcards

(54 cards)

1
Q

logic

A

the systematic use of methods and principles to analyze evaluate and construct arguments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

argument

A

a group of statements in which the conclusion is claimed to follow the premises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

statement

A

a sentence that’s either true or false

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

truth value

A

every statement has a truth value. either true or false

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

proposition

A

the content/meaning of a statement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

inferential claim

A

a passage makes an inferential claim when it expresses a reasoning process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

explanation

A

uses “because” to provide reasons for how/why an event occurred. an already accepted fact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

truth analysis

A

it concerns statements whether is it true or false. determines soundness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

logical analysis

A

concerns arguments. the relationship between premise(s) provides the inferential strength of an argument. determines validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

deductive argument

A

necessarily true. if premises are true it’s impossible for the conclusion to be false

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

inductive argument

A

probably true. improbable that conclusion is false if premises are true.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

valid deductive argument

A

when true premises lead to a true conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

invalid deductive argument

A

when premises are true and the conclusion is false

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

mondus ponens

A

if P then Q / P // therefore, Q.
Valid
ex: if today is Wednesday then I have to go to the dentist. today is Wednesday, therefore, I have to go to the dentist.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

modus tollens

A

if P then Q / not Q // therefore not P
valid
ex: if today is Wednesday then I have to go to the dentist. I don’t have to go to the dentist today. it must not be Wednesday.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

disjunctive syllogism

A

either P or Q / not P // therefore Q
Valid
ex: today is either Tuesday or Wednesday. it’s not Wednesday, therefore, it’s Tuesday

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

affirming the consequent

A

if P then Q / Q // P
invalid
ex: if Becky is sick, then she drinks a lot of juice. she is drinking a lot of juice, therefore, she is sick.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

denying the antecedent

A

if P then Q / not P // therefore not Q
invalid
ex: if it is raining, then the grass is wet. It is not raining. Therefore, the grass is not wet

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

hypothetical syllogism

A

if A then B / if B then C // if A then C
Valid
ex: f world population continues to grow, then cities will become hopelessly overcrowded. If cities become hopelessly overcrowded, then pollution will become intolerable. Therefore, if the world population continues to grow, then pollution will become intolerable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

constructive dilemma

A

if A then B or if C then D / A or C //, therefore, B or D
valid
ex: f we get a cat, then we have to deal with hairballs, and if we get a dog, then we have to deal with shedding. We must choose either a cat or a dog. Therefore, we either have to deal with hairballs or shedding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

cogent inductive argument

A

the argument is strong and the premises are true

ex: most classes are interesting, philosophy 120 is a class. philosophy is probably a fun class

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

uncogent inductive argument

A

the argument is weak and at least 1 premise if false.

ex: It has snowed every day for the last 35 days. So it will probably be sunny today

23
Q

strong inductive argument

A

true premises make it probable that the conclusion is true

ex: Most cats are friendly. Sophie is a cat. So she’s probably friendly

24
Q

weak inductive argument

A

true premises make it improbable that the conclusion is true
ex: It rained twice last week. So it will rain everyday this week

25
propositional logic
the logic of sentences, statements, or propositions.
26
logical operators
the symbols
27
simple statements
plain. has no other letter/statement or logical operator
28
compound statement
has at least 1 simple statement and logical operator as components
29
~
tilde. negation. not; it's not the case that
30
.
dot. conjunction. and; also; moreover; but
31
v
wedge. disjunction. or; unless; neither nor
32
horseshoe. conditional. if...then; only if; given that; implies
33
triple bar. biconditional. if and only if.
34
not both
~A.~B
35
neither nor
~(A.B)
36
necessary condition
the conditions (or features) that a thing must have in order to be that thing. NC’s are best translated as expressing the consequent
37
sufficient condition
conditions that guarantee that something exists or is a certain kind of thing. SC’s are best translated as expressing the antecedent
38
biconditional
a compound statement with two conditionals. both necessary and sufficient (a⊃b).(b⊃a)
39
if...
precedes antecedent
40
only if...
precedes consequent
41
dot (conjunction)
only true when both conjuncts are true
42
wedge (disjunction)
only false when both disjuncts are false
43
horseshoe (conditional)
only false when the antecedent is is true and the consequent is false
44
triple bar (biconditional)
true when both have the same truth value
45
contingent statement
neither necessarily true or false. sometimes true and sometimes false
46
non-contingent statement
the main operator truth values do not depend on the truth values of the component parts. if neither tautology or self-contradiction then it's contingent.
47
tautology
always true
48
self-contradicton
always false
49
logically equivalent statements
two statements that have the exact same truth value on every line
50
contradictory statements
two statements with the exact opposite truth values
51
consistent statements
at least one line where both are true
52
inconsistent
not one line where both are true
53
no name argument form
all A's are B's. / this thing is an A //, therefore, it's a B Valid ex: All Jedi are skilled with lightsabers. Anthony is a Jedi. So, Anthony is skilled with the lightsaber
54
no name argument form #2
all A's are B's / thin is a B // therefore, it's an A invalid ex: All football players are athletes. Russell Wilson is an athlete. So, Russell Wilson is a football player