Test 2 Flashcards

(44 cards)

1
Q

Principal

A

Someone who has someone else acting for them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Agent

A

Acting for someone else

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Duties of Agents

A
  1. Duty of care: The duty to put your employer above your personal gain
  2. Duty of loyalty: work on principal’s behalf in all matters connected w the relationship
  3. Duty to obey instructions
  4. Candor/Duty to provide information: includes relevant, accurate information to disclose with principal, confidentiality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Duties of Principal

A
  1. Duty of compensation
  2. Duty to indemnify: to reimburse any expenses or legal fees if needed
  3. Good Faith Duty to Cooperate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Employee vs Independent Contractor

A

Employee if:
1. Principal supervises details of work
2. Supplies tools/place to work
3. Agent works full-time for principal
4. agent receives salary/hourly wages (not a one-time payment for jobs)
5. Belief there is an employer/employee relationship
6. Principal is in the same type of business

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Sole Proprietorship

A

Pros:
1. Easy to start
2. Flow-through taxes

Cons:
1. Unlimited liab.
2. Hard to raise capital

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Partnerships (types & differences)

A

Types: Gen & Limited Liab

Both:
1. 2 or more people
2. typically professional groups (lawyers, doctors, accountants)
3. own part of business & receive share of prof

Limited:
1. no company involvement
2. no daily responsibilities
3. no liab.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

General Partnership

A

Pros:
1. Easy to form
2. Flow-through taxes
3. Have more access to capital than sole prop

Cons:
1. Unlimited Liab (JOINT & SEVERAL LIAB)
2. Liab for all torts, even if partner committed
3. Management duties can be difficult
4. Capital infusion limited to partners

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Limited Liab Partnership

A

Pros:
1. Limited Liab
2. flow-through taxes
3. can add new partners w/o needed to create an entirely new partnership
4. infusion of cash w/o worry of liab. of other partners

Cons:
1. limited control over management
2. limited control on selling interest
3. must adhere to all state requirements in which you do business

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Corporations (types)

A

Types: S & C & LLC, & Close Corp

An S Corp can become a C Corp, but not vice versa

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

C Corp

A

“have neither bodies to be punished nor souls to condemn”
- single/multiple people invest $ into single entity

Pros:
1. Limited Liab
2. Transferability of Interests (stocks)
3. Long duration of life

Cons:
1. Logistics w/i the company
2. Difficult to form & intricate
3. Lot of requirements (board meetings, records, reporting info to the state)
4. Double taxation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

S Corp

A

Pros:
1. Limited Liab
2. Flow-through taxes
3. Losses may be deducted against other income

Cons:
1. Only one class of stock (no common & preferred)
2. Can only have 100 stockholders
–> must be US citizen
–> no partnership/corp stockholders
3. Not much case law, law varies amongst jurisdictions

Would typically form if you don’t need a lot of capital, ease of formation, flow-through, and limited liab

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

LLC

A

Pros:
1. limited liab
2. flow-through
3. flexibility, diff types of stock can be owned by non-US & partnership/corps
4. less formality than C corp

Cons:
1. Takes more effort to form
2. transfer of interest can be limited to other members
3. law a bit more unsettled
4. capital harder to come by than C corp
5. extra caution about bad/no operating agreements
6. can dissolve if a member withdraws

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Close Corporation

A

Stock is not publicly traded

Pros:
1. limited liab
2. flexibility
3. protection of minority stockholders

Cons:
1. restriction on transfer of stock
2. difficult to raise capital w/ no public trading
3. not much case law & varies among jurisdictions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Shareholder vs Stakeholder

A

Shareholder: Owns equity of your company through stocks
–> have rights to limited info, right to vote, & vote on elections or removal of directors/officers

Stakeholder: One who is impacted by your business decisions (customers, sometimes employees, general society)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Piercing Corporate Veil

A

When a company really fucks up, the judicial system will try to go after individual owners/members of the corporation, regardless of limited liab status. Acts worthy of this:
1. failure to observe formalities
2. comingling assets
3. inadequate capitalization
4. fruad

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Duties of a partnership

A

(Pretty much the same as an agent to a principal)
Duty of care
Duty of loyalty - fiduciary duty
Duty of good faith & fair dealing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Fiduciary relationship

A

Legal responsibility to act solely in best interest of another party

consent + control + fiduciary relationship = agency relationship

19
Q

Partnership by Estoppel

A

Participants tell others they are partners or act like partners

3rd party relies on that assumption

3rd party suffers harm

The court will create partnership to resolve the harm done, but only for the purpose of the case

20
Q

Authority - Liab

A

Actual: liab. for any act authorized by partnership
Implied: liab. for any act reasonably necessary to carry out function or transaction
Apparent: partner appears to be acting w/i authorization and harmed party relied on belief of the authority

21
Q

Business Judgement Rule

A

Courts allow great defrence to managers who act
1. in good faith
2. follow duty of loyalty (no conflict of int)
3. follow duty of care (reasonable standard)

22
Q

Defective Corps

A

De Jure Corp: mostly completed process, promoter substantially complies.
–> De jure = by law
De Facto Corp: some process completed, but it will only be considered a corp for this lawsuit. Promoter acts in good faith & used corp to conduct business
–> De facto = in fact
Corp by Estoppel: no process even started to become a corp, but actions or words led hurt party to assume a relationship. The court will consider corp for this lawsuit

23
Q

Corp Process

A

Promoter: one who organizes corp, personally liab for contracts after formation
Novation: new contract w/ diff parties, reassigning liab
File Charter: name, address, registered agent, business purpose, type of stock, signed by incorporator
Ultra Vires Doctrine: company must have stated purpose & purpose must be in charter. can only do business stated in ultra vires

24
Q

Franchise

A

Pros:
1. Can be partnership/any type of corp
2. Get to run established business
3. Assistance & product from franchisor

Cons:
1. Sometimes expensive
2. Must buy franchisor’s products
3. Must comply w/ franchisee agreement (including national deals)

25
Quorum
certain % of company shares represented at a meeting in order for it to be official
26
Principal & Agent liab w 3rd party
Fully disclosed principal: agent not liab Unidentified: joint & 7veral, both are liab Undisclosed: joint & 7veral, both are liab
27
Agent Authority
Authority: Express, implied Apparent: principal conduct causes 3rd party to reasonable assume agent is authorized Ratification: the principal does not repudiate & takes the benefits Principal always liab on contract to 3rd party
28
Torts - definition
A violation of a duty imposed by civil law
29
Types of Torts
Intentional Negligence - accidental, but society says you must make them whole (take responsibility) Strict Liab - always entirely liable, doesn't matter how it occurred. will remedy to make harmed indv whole
30
Other intentional torts
1. false imprisonment 2. intentional infliction of emotional distress/harm 3. battery: act of touching in harmful way 4. assault: makes one fear battery 5. * fraud: injury by deliberate deception 6. trespassing 7. conversion
31
Defamation
Intentional tort false stmnts against another to harm reputation --> libel: written --> slander: spoken Elements: 1. must be factual stmnt likely to cause harm 2. stmnt is clearly false 3. stmnt communicated to @ least 1 other person 4. injured due to stmnt --> libel/slander per se: injury is presumed due to nature of allegations (related to sexual, criminal, professional abilities, contagious disease, racism) 5. (only apples to public figures) actual malice intended
32
Damages for Intentional Torts
1. compensatory 2. economic: easily quantifiable (medical bills, lost wages, etc) 3. non-econ: called pain & suffering damages 4. punitive: only occur when defendant knew about potential harm & acted so anyway --> ratio between harm & award (9:1) & based off punitive awards in similar cases
33
Business Torts
Interference w business relations Contract: 1. between plaintiff & 3rd party 2. defendant knew abt contract 3. defendant improperly induced 3rd party to breach or made performance impossible 4. plaintiff injured as result Tortious interference w a prospective advantage - malicious interference w developing econ relationship
34
Lanham Act
Commercial Speech/Advertising 1. False fact stmnt abt plaintiff's business 2. Used in commercial stmnt 3. Stmnt created likelihood of harm to plaintiff
35
Negligence Elements
1. Duty of Care - how far should society extend blame when one is hurt 2. Breach of Duty of care 3. Factual Cause or "but for" actions, result wouldn't have occurred 4. Proximate cause - foreseeable consequences 5. Damages - monetary value given to make plaintiff whole
36
Special duty of care
Landowners have a special duty of care to; invitee (highest)
37
Negligence per se
Violate legislature set min standards of care, so it is automatically negligent
38
Negligence - Causation
1. Factual - domino effect, liab for anything that happens along the domino effect 2. Proximate cause - type of harm reasonably forseeable
39
Res Ipsa Loquitor
"it speaks for itself" 1. defendant had exclusive control 2. harm normally wouldn't occur w/o negligence AND plaintiff had no role An infrerence of negligence drawn from the happening of the accident ex: in cases where blame is unclear bc it was an inanimate object, etc
40
Breach of Duty of care
Defendant didn't act with society's min standards of care
41
Strict Liab - U
Defendant will be liab regardless of cause or nature of negligence Mostly for ultrahazardous activity
42
Strict Liab - P
Product Liab (can create strict liab) 1. Negligent design 2. Negligent manufacture 3. Failure to warn Gen state model: defective products are subjected to strict liab for physical harm/property damaged, when the product is used in reasonable & forseeable manner Applies even if seller exercised all possible care & no seller & user contract to sell/purchase product
43
Statute of Limitations
time period to file lawsuit
44
Statute of Repose
absolute time limit, regardless of knowledge