Test 2 Flashcards
(145 cards)
Spasticity, is there CNS involvement
if you have spasticity you must have damage to the CNS
it is damage to the motor control system
but if you have damage to the CNS you do not have to have spasticity
What happens in spasticity in its effect on tone
it is an alteration in ability to regulate muscle tone
hypertonia: increased tone
hypotonia: decreased tone
Muscle Tone
name three definitions, 2 about CNS and one not
- Resting tension in a muscle as evidenced by RESISTANCE TO ELONGATION DUE TO JOINT MOVEMENT: how much the muscle resists lengthening
- balance of EXCITATORY and INHIBITORY influences on the SPINAL MOTOR NEURON innervating the muscles
excitatory = contraction
inhibitory = relaxation - Elastic properties of the muscle itself (muscles are elastic and so this is part of the definition not relate to the CNS but is structural in the muscle)
Neuropathology of Spasticity (3)
- damage to the UMN or descending pathways
- Loss of modulation of spinal reflexes: to modulate reflex of tapping tendon causing a pathologically brisk response
- increased responsiveness to sensory (afferent) input: ie light touch, deep breath, bright light can stimulate
Spasticity
define
- it is an increased responsiveness of the monosynaptic stretch reflex = DTR = Ia reflex = phasic reflex
- MSR: monosynaptic stretch reflex: single synapse between afferent (sensory) and efferent (motor) limb of the reflex arc
- fastest response in the nervous system
What is MSR
MSR: monosynaptic stretch reflex: single synapse between afferent (sensory) and efferent (motor) limb of the reflex arc
True or False: Spasticity is ony set off by stretch
FALSE
does not have to be stretch
can be set off by skin touch, pinprick, hair pull, pain
Is spasticity more problematic in complete or incomplete SCI?
Spasticity is more of a problem in an
INCOMPLETE
remaining intact supraspinal descending inputs are no longer appropriate for reorganized spinal circuits, leading to greater motor dyscontrol
–intact supraspinal influences from the brain are no longer appropriate to the spinal circuits that are now reorganized : miscommunication with the reorganized circuits below
–incomplete injury is not consistent presentation and spasticity has a less predictable profile in the incomplete (moderate to severe, flexion to extension spasticity)
Remaining intact supraspinal descending inputs are no longer appropriate for reorganized spinal circuits, leading to greater motor dyscontrol
incomplete SCI
Agonist / Antagonist
–what happens if treat too aggressively
–what happens if left untreated
repeated contraction of spastic agonist muscle and tendon shortness makes them further resistant to stretch
if untreated the spasticity gets worse :
–spasticity has to do with the agonist/antagonist relationship: when one lengthens the other shortens and repeated contractions cause agonist to SHORTEN and become more RESISTANCE TO STRETCH as the muscle continuously shorten and lose ROM over time causing a contracture as muscle loses range
If treat too aggressive: can lead to problem if it is useful for function –but untreated then it will get worse because of the contracture of passive elastic elements in the muscle itself
what percent of SCI report spasticity in their first year?
60-80%
what percent of SCI report spasticity to be problematic?
30-40% report spasticity as problematic : especially in cervical SCI: more of a problem when we have a higher injury
(even though 60-80% report spasticity in their first year)
Why is a higher SCI more of a problem to have spasticity?
More damaged segments of the body to move and they also have to be fighting the spasticity
What are the limitations in understanding spasticity treatment?
- the way it is defined and described is variable
- MAS the most widely accepted scale, but spasticity in some patients may not be captured by some of these
- depends on clinic and tester and patient for variability
- tests measure slightly different aspects of spasticity
- severity of spasticity can vary between different patients and within a patient
- distribution can be different in patient to patient
- it can be recognized but it varies and measurement is challenging, spastic responses may depend on the stimulus used –pro of MAS is clear instructions on how to illicit the spasticity
Variations in reports of incidence of spasticity
Name 4 Issues
1–DEFINED in different ways by the clinic and individual
2–MEASURED by different tests and measuring different parameters
3–SEVERITY and DISTRIBUTION can VARY over joints, muscles, time of day, and can CHANGE over long term
4–responses depend on STIMULUS used to ellicit
Modified Ashworth Scale
0: no increase in tone
1: slightly increased tone/ catch and release/ min resistance at end of ROM
1+: slightly increased tone/ a catch/ minimal resistance throughout the remainder of ROM (less than 1/2)
2: More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected part(s) easily moved
3: Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult
4: Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension
MAS
0
0: no increase in tone
MAS
1
1: slightly increased tone/ catch and release/ min resistance at end of ROM
MAS
1+
1+: slightly increased tone/ a catch/ minimal resistance throughout the remainder of ROM (less than 1/2)
MAS
2
2: More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected part(s) easily moved
MAS
3
3: Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult
MAS
4
4: Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension
MAS: PRO CON
Pro (2)
Con (5)
PRO:
1. High Inter-rater reliability
- ## High Intra-rater reliabilityCON: only level of impairment and not level of function
- specific extremities, not trunk
- only tests passive movement
- does not account for effect of position
- does not account for affect of exertion
- range is NOT measured therefore a contracture can result in false positive
What are cons of MAS
CON: only level of IMPAIRMENT and not level of function
- specific extremities, not trunk
- only tests PASSIVE movement
- does not account for effect of POSITION
- does not account for affect of EXERTION
- RANGE is NOT measured therefore a CONTRACTURE can result in false positive (should measure ROM first)