Test 2 Flashcards
(173 cards)
problem solving
Problem solving is the process of identifying a discrepancy between an actual and a desired state of affairs and then taking action to resolve it.
knowledge workers
managers fit the definition of knowledge workers, persons whose value to organizations rests with their intellectual, not physical, capabilities.2
technological competency
s. Technological competency is the ability to understand new technologies and use them to their best advantage. In many ways this involves moving skills we already use in everyday personal affairs—social media, Internet, smart devices—into work-related applications
information competency
. Information competency is the ability to locate, retrieve, organize, and display information of potential value to decision making and problem solving. This means, for example, not just getting information from hearsay or off the Internet; it means locating credible and valuable information.
analytical competency
Analytical competency is the ability to evaluate and analyze information to make actual decisions and solve real problems.3 This involves being able to digest and sort through information, even very large amounts of data, and then use it well to make good decisions that solve real problems
performance threat
performance threat. This occurs as an actual or potential performance deficiency. Something is wrong or is likely to be wrong in the near future. Hurricane Katrina is an example worth remembering. There were lots of warnings about this storm, but many underestimated or were either ambivalent or overconfident in preparing for it. Too many people weren’t ready when Katrina slammed into New Orleans, and a high price was paid for their errors.
performance opportunity
performance opportunity. This is a situation that offers the possibility of a better future if the right steps are taken now. Suppose a regional manager notices that sales at one retail store are unusually high. Does she just say, “Great”, and go on about her business? That’s an opportunity missed. A really sharp manager says: “Wait a minute, there may be something happening here that I could learn from and possibly transfer to other stores. I had better find out what’s going on.” That’s an opportunity gained.
problem avoiders
Some managers are problem avoiders. They ignore information that would otherwise signal the presence of a performance threat or opportunity. They are not active in gathering information and prefer not to make decisions or deal with problems.
problem solvers
problem solvers. They make decisions and try to solve problems, but only when required. They are reactive, gathering information and responding to problems when they occur, but not before. These managers may deal reasonably well with performance threats, but they are likely to miss many performance opportunities.
problem seekers
problem seekers. They are always looking for problems to solve or opportunities to explore. True problem seekers are proactive as information gatherers, and they are forward thinking. They anticipate threats and opportunities, and they are eager to take action to gain the advantage in dealing with them.
decision
decision is a choice among possible alternative courses of action. Let’s also agree that decisions can be made in different ways, with some ways working better than others in various circumstances.
programmed decisions
Some management problems are routine and repetitive. They can be addressed through programmed decisions that apply preplanned solutions based on the lessons of past experience. Such decisions work best for structured problems that are familiar, straightforward, and clear with respect to information needs. In human resource management, for example, decisions always have to be made on things such as vacations and holiday work schedules. Forward-looking managers can use past experience and plan ahead to make these decisions in programmed, not spontaneous, ways.
nonprogrammed decisions
These unstructured problems require nonprogrammed decisions that must craft novel solutions to meet the unique demands of a situation. In the recent financial crisis, for example, all eyes were on President Obama’s choice of Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner. His task was to solve the problems with billions in bad loans made by the nation’s banks and restore stability to the financial markets. But it was uncharted territory; no prepackaged solutions were readily available. Geithner and his team did what they believed was best. But in difficult and dynamic circumstances, the nonprogrammed decisions they made were hotly debated, and only time would tell if they were the right ones.
systematic thinking
In systematic thinking a person approaches problems in a rational, step-by-step, and analytical fashion. You might recognize this when someone you are working with tries to break a complex problem into smaller components that can be addressed one by one. We might expect systematic managers to make a plan before taking action and to search for information and proceed with problem solving in a fact-based and step-by-step fashion.
intuitive thinking
intuitive thinking is more flexible and spontaneous than the systematic thinker, and they may be quite creative.4 You might observe this pattern in someone who always seems to come up with an imaginative response to a problem, often based on a quick and broad evaluation of the situation. Intuitive managers tend to deal with many aspects of a problem at once, jump quickly from one issue to another, and act on either hunches based on experience or on spontaneous ideas.
cognitive styles
f cognitive styles, or the way individuals deal with information while making decisions.
sensation thinker
Sensation thinker
—STs tend to emphasize the impersonal rather than the personal and take a realistic approach to problem solving. They like hard “facts,” clear goals, certainty, and situations of high control.
intuitive thinker
Intuitive thinkers
—ITs are comfortable with abstraction and unstructured situations. They tend to be idealistic, prone toward intellectual and theoretical positions; they are logical and impersonal but also avoid details.
intuitive feelers
Intuitive feelers
—IFs prefer broad and global issues. They are insightful and tend to avoid details, being comfortable with intangibles; they value flexibility and human relationships.
sensation feelers
Sensation feelers
—SFs tend to emphasize both analysis and human relations. They tend to be realistic and prefer facts; they are open communicators and sensitive to feelings and values.
certain environment
a certain environment. This is an ideal decision situation where factual information exists for the possible alternative courses of action and their consequences. All a decision maker needs to do is study the alternatives and choose the best solution. It isn’t easy to find examples of decision situations with such certain conditions. One possibility is a decision to take out a “fixed-rate” loan—say for college studies or a new car. At least you can make the decision knowing future interest costs and repayment timetables.
risk environments
Whereas absolute certainty is the best scenario for decision makers, the reality is that in our personal lives and in management, we more often face risk environments where information and facts are incomplete. An example is the offer of a variable-rate loan as just discussed. In risk conditions, alternative courses of action and their consequences can be analyzed only as probabilities (e.g., 4 chances out of 10). One way of dealing with risk is by gathering as much information as possible, perhaps in different ways. In the case of a new product, such as Coke Zero or even a college textbook like this, it is unlikely that marketing executives would make go-ahead decisions without lots of data gathering and analysis. Often this involves getting reports from multiple focus groups that test the new product in its sample stages.
uncertain environment
When facts are few and information is so poor that managers have a hard time even assigning probabilities to things, an uncertain environment exists. This is the most difficult decision condition.8 It’s also more common than you might think. And, the border line between risk and uncertainty isn’t always clear. When the Japanese built a nuclear power plant at Fukushima—on the seacoast and in an earthquake zone, were decision makers just taking a calculated risk, or were they acting in the face of absolute uncertainty?
five steps of the decision making process
- identify and define problem
- generate and evaluate alternative situations
- decide on preferred course of action
- implement the decision
- evaluate decision